大肿瘤姑息性空间分层立体定向放射治疗(Lattice)后与时间相关的疗效--一个病例系列

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY Advances in Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.adro.2024.101566
Gabriela Studer MD, David Jeller, Tino Streller PhD, Dirk Huebner, Christoph Glanzmann MD
{"title":"大肿瘤姑息性空间分层立体定向放射治疗(Lattice)后与时间相关的疗效--一个病例系列","authors":"Gabriela Studer MD,&nbsp;David Jeller,&nbsp;Tino Streller PhD,&nbsp;Dirk Huebner,&nbsp;Christoph Glanzmann MD","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Lattice radiation therapy (LRT), a form of spatially fractionated radiation therapy, holds promise for treating large tumors. Despite its introduction in clinical practice around 2010, there remains limited information on its time-related outcomes despite consistently high response rates and tolerability. We assessed the time-related outcome of our palliative LRT cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>We conducted an analysis of our LRT program, which involved 45 palliative patients with 56 lesions larger than 7 cm, treated between January 2022 and November 2023. Prospectively defined treatment protocols included delivering 20 to 25 Gy/5 fractions to the tumor with a stereotactic simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) of 60 to 65 Gy to lattice vertices (n = 45/56) or, mainly in preirradiated lesions, single fraction stereotaxy with 1 × 15 to 20 Gy to vertices only (n = 11/56). Follow-up (FU) intervals were determined based on clinical considerations, considering the mostly highly palliative situation of included patients. Outcome assessments focused on subjective benefit and objective radiologic FU response.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean/median FU was 5.5/4.0 months (0.3-21 months). A total of 25/45 (56%) patients died after a mean/median of 3.9/2.0 months (0.3-14 months). Fourteen of 56 lesions (25%) were previously irradiated, with a mean/median of 18/13 months (4-72 months) prior to LRT. The mean/median gross tumor volume (GTV) measured 797/415 cc (54-4027 cc) and 14/13 cm (7-28 cm). Subjective statements at LRT completion were available from 37 symptomatic patients: 32/37 (87%) reported fast symptom relief, and 5/37 felt no change under LRT or at LRT completion. Early tolerance was excellent (G0-1). FU imaging was available from 40/56 lesions (71%): progression in 3/40 at first exam one at 1.5 and 4 months post-LRT, and stable disease (±10%) in 5/40 assessed at 2, 3, 3, and 4 months post-LRT. First measure shrinkage of 48%/30% (10%-100%) was found in 32/40 lesions (80%) after a mean/median of 2.8/3 months (0.3-7 months). Maximum shrinkage over time based on 21 cases with at least 1 FU imaging measured a mean/median of 62%/60% after 6.2/5.5 months. The duration of radiologic response was a mean/median of 7.4/7.0 months (1-21 months).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Short-course LRT emerged as an effective and well-tolerated palliative option for very large lesions, whether treatment-naïve or previously irradiated. Nearly 90% of symptomatic patients reported significant subjective benefit, and 80% of assessed lesions demonstrated tumor shrinkage ≥10%, with a mean response duration of &gt;6 months.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"9 9","pages":"Article 101566"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001295/pdfft?md5=b573b2ed77b74b99693c0d7fa8815038&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001295-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time-Related Outcome Following Palliative Spatially Fractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy (Lattice) of Large Tumors – A Case Series\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Studer MD,&nbsp;David Jeller,&nbsp;Tino Streller PhD,&nbsp;Dirk Huebner,&nbsp;Christoph Glanzmann MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Lattice radiation therapy (LRT), a form of spatially fractionated radiation therapy, holds promise for treating large tumors. Despite its introduction in clinical practice around 2010, there remains limited information on its time-related outcomes despite consistently high response rates and tolerability. We assessed the time-related outcome of our palliative LRT cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><p>We conducted an analysis of our LRT program, which involved 45 palliative patients with 56 lesions larger than 7 cm, treated between January 2022 and November 2023. Prospectively defined treatment protocols included delivering 20 to 25 Gy/5 fractions to the tumor with a stereotactic simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) of 60 to 65 Gy to lattice vertices (n = 45/56) or, mainly in preirradiated lesions, single fraction stereotaxy with 1 × 15 to 20 Gy to vertices only (n = 11/56). Follow-up (FU) intervals were determined based on clinical considerations, considering the mostly highly palliative situation of included patients. Outcome assessments focused on subjective benefit and objective radiologic FU response.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean/median FU was 5.5/4.0 months (0.3-21 months). A total of 25/45 (56%) patients died after a mean/median of 3.9/2.0 months (0.3-14 months). Fourteen of 56 lesions (25%) were previously irradiated, with a mean/median of 18/13 months (4-72 months) prior to LRT. The mean/median gross tumor volume (GTV) measured 797/415 cc (54-4027 cc) and 14/13 cm (7-28 cm). Subjective statements at LRT completion were available from 37 symptomatic patients: 32/37 (87%) reported fast symptom relief, and 5/37 felt no change under LRT or at LRT completion. Early tolerance was excellent (G0-1). FU imaging was available from 40/56 lesions (71%): progression in 3/40 at first exam one at 1.5 and 4 months post-LRT, and stable disease (±10%) in 5/40 assessed at 2, 3, 3, and 4 months post-LRT. First measure shrinkage of 48%/30% (10%-100%) was found in 32/40 lesions (80%) after a mean/median of 2.8/3 months (0.3-7 months). Maximum shrinkage over time based on 21 cases with at least 1 FU imaging measured a mean/median of 62%/60% after 6.2/5.5 months. The duration of radiologic response was a mean/median of 7.4/7.0 months (1-21 months).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Short-course LRT emerged as an effective and well-tolerated palliative option for very large lesions, whether treatment-naïve or previously irradiated. Nearly 90% of symptomatic patients reported significant subjective benefit, and 80% of assessed lesions demonstrated tumor shrinkage ≥10%, with a mean response duration of &gt;6 months.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 9\",\"pages\":\"Article 101566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001295/pdfft?md5=b573b2ed77b74b99693c0d7fa8815038&pid=1-s2.0-S2452109424001295-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001295\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424001295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的格子放射疗法(LRT)是一种空间分次放射疗法,有望治疗巨大肿瘤。尽管该疗法在2010年左右被引入临床实践,但尽管其反应率和耐受性一直很高,有关其时间相关结果的信息仍然有限。我们对姑息性 LRT 队列的时间相关结果进行了评估。方法和材料我们对 LRT 项目进行了分析,该项目涉及 45 名姑息性患者,56 个病灶大于 7 厘米,治疗时间为 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 11 月。前瞻性定义的治疗方案包括:对肿瘤进行20至25 Gy/5次分割,并对晶格顶点进行60至65 Gy的立体定向同时整合增强(SIB)(n = 45/56),或主要对预照射病灶进行单次分割立体定向,仅对顶点进行1 × 15至20 Gy(n = 11/56)。随访(FU)时间间隔是根据临床考虑确定的,考虑到纳入患者的情况大多高度缓和。结果平均/中位随访时间为5.5/4.0个月(0.3-21个月)。25/45(56%)名患者在平均/中位数3.9/2.0个月(0.3-14个月)后死亡。56 例病变中有 14 例(25%)曾接受过放射治疗,LRT 前的平均/中位时间为 18/13 个月(4-72 个月)。平均/中位肿瘤总体积(GTV)分别为 797/415 毫升(54-4027 毫升)和 14/13 厘米(7-28 厘米)。37 名有症状的患者提供了 LRT 结束时的主观陈述:32/37(87%)的患者称症状得到快速缓解,5/37 的患者在 LRT 治疗过程中或 LRT 治疗结束时感觉没有变化。早期耐受性极佳(G0-1)。40/56 个病灶(71%)获得了 FU 成像:3/40 在首次检查时出现进展,1/40 在 LRT 后 1.5 个月和 4 个月出现进展,5/40 在 LRT 后 2 个月、3 个月、3 个月和 4 个月出现病情稳定(±10%)。在平均/中值为 2.8/3 个月(0.3-7 个月)后,32/40 个病灶(80%)的首次测量收缩率为 48%/30%(10%-100%)。根据 21 个病例至少 1 次 FU 成像,在 6.2/5.5 个月后,最大缩小率的平均值/中位值为 62%/60%。结论短程LRT是治疗巨大病灶的一种有效且耐受性良好的姑息选择,无论病灶是未经治疗还是曾接受过放射治疗。近90%的无症状患者报告主观疗效显著,80%的评估病灶显示肿瘤缩小≥10%,平均反应持续时间为6个月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Time-Related Outcome Following Palliative Spatially Fractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy (Lattice) of Large Tumors – A Case Series

Purpose

Lattice radiation therapy (LRT), a form of spatially fractionated radiation therapy, holds promise for treating large tumors. Despite its introduction in clinical practice around 2010, there remains limited information on its time-related outcomes despite consistently high response rates and tolerability. We assessed the time-related outcome of our palliative LRT cohort.

Methods and Materials

We conducted an analysis of our LRT program, which involved 45 palliative patients with 56 lesions larger than 7 cm, treated between January 2022 and November 2023. Prospectively defined treatment protocols included delivering 20 to 25 Gy/5 fractions to the tumor with a stereotactic simultaneously integrated boost (SIB) of 60 to 65 Gy to lattice vertices (n = 45/56) or, mainly in preirradiated lesions, single fraction stereotaxy with 1 × 15 to 20 Gy to vertices only (n = 11/56). Follow-up (FU) intervals were determined based on clinical considerations, considering the mostly highly palliative situation of included patients. Outcome assessments focused on subjective benefit and objective radiologic FU response.

Results

The mean/median FU was 5.5/4.0 months (0.3-21 months). A total of 25/45 (56%) patients died after a mean/median of 3.9/2.0 months (0.3-14 months). Fourteen of 56 lesions (25%) were previously irradiated, with a mean/median of 18/13 months (4-72 months) prior to LRT. The mean/median gross tumor volume (GTV) measured 797/415 cc (54-4027 cc) and 14/13 cm (7-28 cm). Subjective statements at LRT completion were available from 37 symptomatic patients: 32/37 (87%) reported fast symptom relief, and 5/37 felt no change under LRT or at LRT completion. Early tolerance was excellent (G0-1). FU imaging was available from 40/56 lesions (71%): progression in 3/40 at first exam one at 1.5 and 4 months post-LRT, and stable disease (±10%) in 5/40 assessed at 2, 3, 3, and 4 months post-LRT. First measure shrinkage of 48%/30% (10%-100%) was found in 32/40 lesions (80%) after a mean/median of 2.8/3 months (0.3-7 months). Maximum shrinkage over time based on 21 cases with at least 1 FU imaging measured a mean/median of 62%/60% after 6.2/5.5 months. The duration of radiologic response was a mean/median of 7.4/7.0 months (1-21 months).

Conclusions

Short-course LRT emerged as an effective and well-tolerated palliative option for very large lesions, whether treatment-naïve or previously irradiated. Nearly 90% of symptomatic patients reported significant subjective benefit, and 80% of assessed lesions demonstrated tumor shrinkage ≥10%, with a mean response duration of >6 months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Radiation Oncology
Advances in Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
98 days
期刊介绍: The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.
期刊最新文献
Outcomes After Stereotactic Body Radiation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients With Child-Pugh A Versus Child-Pugh B/C Cirrhosis Editorial board Pegylated Interferon Combined With Low-Dose Total Skin Electron Beam Therapy for Advanced Stage Mycosis Fungoides: Two Case Reports and Literature Review Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Based Online Adaptive Radiation Therapy of Esophageal Cancer: First Clinical Experience and Dosimetric Benefits Prospective Trial on the Impact of Weekly Cone Beam Computed Tomography-Guided Correction on Mean Heart Dose in Breast Cancer Breath-Hold Radiation Therapy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1