古代波利斯是重塑当代欢乐场所的沃土

Q3 Social Sciences Sociologija i Prostor Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.5673/sip.62.1.3
{"title":"古代波利斯是重塑当代欢乐场所的沃土","authors":"","doi":"10.5673/sip.62.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper deals with the contemporary, dynamic relation between people and the places they inhabit, by examining whether relative antique philosophical concepts – eu-daimonia and hedonism – might serve as a basis for what we call today well-being . Further, this paper explores Socrates’ and Plato’s belief that a polis (ancient city-state) was a significant social phenomenon, far more important than individuals’ well-being. Building upon this premise, the paper navigates the intricate relationship between individual and collective well-being within modern urban contexts. The thin line between hedonism and self-interest is investigated in the contemporary urban framework – that of an individualistic, consumerist, and materialistic world, with limited and shared spaces and resources. In conclusion, this paper advocates for a rethinking of the ancient Greek polis as a source of inspiration for reimagining urban futures, by integrating historical wisdom with contemporary urban planning practices to foster more equitable, sustainable, and fulfilling urban environments.","PeriodicalId":39267,"journal":{"name":"Sociologija i Prostor","volume":"265 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ancient Polis as a Fertile Ground for Reimagining Contemporary Pleasurable Places\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.5673/sip.62.1.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper deals with the contemporary, dynamic relation between people and the places they inhabit, by examining whether relative antique philosophical concepts – eu-daimonia and hedonism – might serve as a basis for what we call today well-being . Further, this paper explores Socrates’ and Plato’s belief that a polis (ancient city-state) was a significant social phenomenon, far more important than individuals’ well-being. Building upon this premise, the paper navigates the intricate relationship between individual and collective well-being within modern urban contexts. The thin line between hedonism and self-interest is investigated in the contemporary urban framework – that of an individualistic, consumerist, and materialistic world, with limited and shared spaces and resources. In conclusion, this paper advocates for a rethinking of the ancient Greek polis as a source of inspiration for reimagining urban futures, by integrating historical wisdom with contemporary urban planning practices to foster more equitable, sustainable, and fulfilling urban environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociologija i Prostor\",\"volume\":\"265 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociologija i Prostor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5673/sip.62.1.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologija i Prostor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5673/sip.62.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了当代人与其居住地之间的动态关系,研究了相对的古代哲学概念--eu-daimonia 和享乐主义--是否可以作为我们今天所说的福祉的基础。此外,本文还探讨了苏格拉底和柏拉图的信念,即 polis(古代城邦)是一种重要的社会现象,远比个人福祉重要。在此前提下,本文探讨了现代城市背景下个人福祉与集体福祉之间错综复杂的关系。在当代城市框架中,即在个人主义、消费主义和物质主义的世界中,在有限和共享的空间和资源中,对享乐主义和自我利益之间的细微界限进行了研究。最后,本文主张重新思考古希腊政体,将其作为重新构想城市未来的灵感源泉,将历史智慧与当代城市规划实践相结合,营造更加公平、可持续和充实的城市环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ancient Polis as a Fertile Ground for Reimagining Contemporary Pleasurable Places
This paper deals with the contemporary, dynamic relation between people and the places they inhabit, by examining whether relative antique philosophical concepts – eu-daimonia and hedonism – might serve as a basis for what we call today well-being . Further, this paper explores Socrates’ and Plato’s belief that a polis (ancient city-state) was a significant social phenomenon, far more important than individuals’ well-being. Building upon this premise, the paper navigates the intricate relationship between individual and collective well-being within modern urban contexts. The thin line between hedonism and self-interest is investigated in the contemporary urban framework – that of an individualistic, consumerist, and materialistic world, with limited and shared spaces and resources. In conclusion, this paper advocates for a rethinking of the ancient Greek polis as a source of inspiration for reimagining urban futures, by integrating historical wisdom with contemporary urban planning practices to foster more equitable, sustainable, and fulfilling urban environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociologija i Prostor
Sociologija i Prostor Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
When Worlds Collide: Sociality Between Physical and Cyberspace during the COVID-19 Pandemic Doprinos civilnog društva kvaliteti života osoba u starijoj životnoj dobi u gradu Zagrebu „Lijepo je doći tu na par dana, ali je živjeti teško…“ – razvojni potencijali i prepreke ruralnih naselja Gorskoga kotara i sjevernodalmatinskih otoka iz perspektive stanovnika Networking Through Persistence: Case Study on the Position and Development of the Clubture Network Slobodno vrijeme i međukulturna osjetljivost studenata učiteljskih studija
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1