欧洲法院对欧盟自有资源决定的司法审查

IF 0.8 Q2 LAW Intertax Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.54648/taxi2024057
Jakob Dürr
{"title":"欧洲法院对欧盟自有资源决定的司法审查","authors":"Jakob Dürr","doi":"10.54648/taxi2024057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The European Union must finance the repayment of the debt it has contracted through Next Generation EU (NGEU). This has brought a new dynamic to the debate on the reform of its financial order. The ideas put forward in this context are diverse and sometimes unorthodox, thereby provoking questions on the legal limits set by the existing Treaty framework. The article complements this debate by focusing on the specific instrument that determines the resources available to the EU – the Own Resources Decision (ORD) pursuant to Article 311(3) TFEU. It seeks to answer one question: What is the correct legal framework the European Court of Justice (ECJ) would have to apply in a case in which it is asked to rule on the legality or validity of the ORD? To explore this question, it analyses the legal requirements contained in Article 311(3) TFEU, discusses the legal nature of the ORD, and examines what type of review the ECJ would be able to exercise regarding its different procedural and substantive aspects.\n","PeriodicalId":45365,"journal":{"name":"Intertax","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Judicial Review of the EU Own Resources Decision by the ECJ\",\"authors\":\"Jakob Dürr\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/taxi2024057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The European Union must finance the repayment of the debt it has contracted through Next Generation EU (NGEU). This has brought a new dynamic to the debate on the reform of its financial order. The ideas put forward in this context are diverse and sometimes unorthodox, thereby provoking questions on the legal limits set by the existing Treaty framework. The article complements this debate by focusing on the specific instrument that determines the resources available to the EU – the Own Resources Decision (ORD) pursuant to Article 311(3) TFEU. It seeks to answer one question: What is the correct legal framework the European Court of Justice (ECJ) would have to apply in a case in which it is asked to rule on the legality or validity of the ORD? To explore this question, it analyses the legal requirements contained in Article 311(3) TFEU, discusses the legal nature of the ORD, and examines what type of review the ECJ would be able to exercise regarding its different procedural and substantive aspects.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":45365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intertax\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intertax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2024057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intertax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/taxi2024057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟必须通过 "下一代欧盟"(NGEU)为偿还债务提供资金。这给有关欧盟金融秩序改革的辩论带来了新的动力。在此背景下提出的想法多种多样,有时甚至是非正统的,从而引发了对现有条约框架所设定的法律限制的质疑。本文通过关注决定欧盟可用资源的具体文书--《欧盟运作条约》第 311(3)条规定的自有资源决定 (ORD),对这一辩论进行了补充。它试图回答一个问题:在欧洲法院(ECJ)被要求就《自有资源决定》的合法性或有效性做出裁决的情况下,其必须适用的正确法律框架是什么?为了探讨这个问题,本报告分析了《欧盟运作条约》第 311(3)条所包含的法律要求,讨论了《指令》的法律性质,并研究了欧洲法院能够对其不同的程序和实质方面进行何种类型的审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Judicial Review of the EU Own Resources Decision by the ECJ
The European Union must finance the repayment of the debt it has contracted through Next Generation EU (NGEU). This has brought a new dynamic to the debate on the reform of its financial order. The ideas put forward in this context are diverse and sometimes unorthodox, thereby provoking questions on the legal limits set by the existing Treaty framework. The article complements this debate by focusing on the specific instrument that determines the resources available to the EU – the Own Resources Decision (ORD) pursuant to Article 311(3) TFEU. It seeks to answer one question: What is the correct legal framework the European Court of Justice (ECJ) would have to apply in a case in which it is asked to rule on the legality or validity of the ORD? To explore this question, it analyses the legal requirements contained in Article 311(3) TFEU, discusses the legal nature of the ORD, and examines what type of review the ECJ would be able to exercise regarding its different procedural and substantive aspects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intertax
Intertax LAW-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
(In)congruence Between Taxation, Spending, and Representation: The Ambiguous Character of Tax-based Contributions Taxing Powers of the European Union Judicial Review of the EU Own Resources Decision by the ECJ Protecting EU Financial Interests in the Collection of Tax-Based Own Resources Article: Conflicts between Directives that Require Taxation of Income and Tax Treaties: The Effectiveness of the EU Primacy-based Conflict Rule
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1