眼科研究金项目主任和受训人员的性别分析

Kelly N. Miller , Mojisola A. Lawson , Nikisha Q. Richards
{"title":"眼科研究金项目主任和受训人员的性别分析","authors":"Kelly N. Miller ,&nbsp;Mojisola A. Lawson ,&nbsp;Nikisha Q. Richards","doi":"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine the gender ratios of ophthalmology fellows and fellowship program directors.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Quantitative cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Programs were identified using the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO) and the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) websites. Programs were contacted via email survey to determine the gender of the current fellow(s) and fellowship program director in the academic year 2022–2023. Fisher's Exact Test* was undertaken to establish statistical significance (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) between female program director percentages across fellowship subspecialties.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>220 out of 287 programs were analyzed: pediatrics (9.1 %), neuroophthalmology (9.5 %), cornea (13.2 %), oculoplastics (16.8 %), uveitis (4.1 %), glaucoma (18.6 %), surgical retina (24.1 %), medical retina (2.3 %), and oncology/pathology (2.3 %). Women fellow-dominated subspecialties (&gt;50 %) included pediatric ophthalmology (69.4 %), neuro-ophthalmology (65.6 %), oculoplastics (61.4 %), and cornea (58.8 %). Uveitis (45.4 %), glaucoma (44.6 %), and surgical retina (32.8 %) were considered women fellow minority subspecialties (&lt; 50 %). Medical retina and oncology/pathology had equal representation of fellows (50 %). Women fellowship directors remain in the minority (&lt; 50 %) across six of the nine fellowships examined; neuro-ophthalmology, oculoplastics, cornea, glaucoma, surgical retina, and oncology/pathology. The women fellow-dominated subspecialties had higher rates of women fellowship program directors (40.2 %) versus women fellow minority subspecialties (28.1 %) (<em>p</em> = 0.0811*).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is a lack of women representation throughout the ophthalmology fellowship program leadership. Subspecialties with predominant women program directors have higher women fellow representation. Future investigations will focus on fellowship applicants and the influence the gender of the program director may have on selection criteria for various subspecialty training.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100071,"journal":{"name":"AJO International","volume":"1 3","pages":"Article 100057"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000571/pdfft?md5=78a303710ef771662ccff3a9556dabf1&pid=1-s2.0-S2950253524000571-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender analysis of ophthalmology fellowship program directors and trainees\",\"authors\":\"Kelly N. Miller ,&nbsp;Mojisola A. Lawson ,&nbsp;Nikisha Q. Richards\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajoint.2024.100057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To determine the gender ratios of ophthalmology fellows and fellowship program directors.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Quantitative cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Programs were identified using the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO) and the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) websites. Programs were contacted via email survey to determine the gender of the current fellow(s) and fellowship program director in the academic year 2022–2023. Fisher's Exact Test* was undertaken to establish statistical significance (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) between female program director percentages across fellowship subspecialties.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>220 out of 287 programs were analyzed: pediatrics (9.1 %), neuroophthalmology (9.5 %), cornea (13.2 %), oculoplastics (16.8 %), uveitis (4.1 %), glaucoma (18.6 %), surgical retina (24.1 %), medical retina (2.3 %), and oncology/pathology (2.3 %). Women fellow-dominated subspecialties (&gt;50 %) included pediatric ophthalmology (69.4 %), neuro-ophthalmology (65.6 %), oculoplastics (61.4 %), and cornea (58.8 %). Uveitis (45.4 %), glaucoma (44.6 %), and surgical retina (32.8 %) were considered women fellow minority subspecialties (&lt; 50 %). Medical retina and oncology/pathology had equal representation of fellows (50 %). Women fellowship directors remain in the minority (&lt; 50 %) across six of the nine fellowships examined; neuro-ophthalmology, oculoplastics, cornea, glaucoma, surgical retina, and oncology/pathology. The women fellow-dominated subspecialties had higher rates of women fellowship program directors (40.2 %) versus women fellow minority subspecialties (28.1 %) (<em>p</em> = 0.0811*).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is a lack of women representation throughout the ophthalmology fellowship program leadership. Subspecialties with predominant women program directors have higher women fellow representation. Future investigations will focus on fellowship applicants and the influence the gender of the program director may have on selection criteria for various subspecialty training.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AJO International\",\"volume\":\"1 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000571/pdfft?md5=78a303710ef771662ccff3a9556dabf1&pid=1-s2.0-S2950253524000571-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AJO International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJO International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950253524000571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法通过眼科大学教授协会(AUPO)和美国眼科整形与重建外科协会(ASOPRS)的网站确定项目。我们通过电子邮件调查与这些项目取得联系,以确定 2022-2023 学年现任研究员和研究项目主任的性别。对287个项目中的220个项目进行了分析:儿科(9.1 %)、神经眼科(9.5 %)、角膜(13.2 %)、眼部整形(16.8 %)、葡萄膜炎(4.1 %)、青光眼(18.6 %)、外科视网膜(24.1 %)、内科视网膜(2.3 %)和肿瘤学/病理学(2.3 %)。女性研究员占多数的亚专科(50%)包括小儿眼科(69.4%)、神经眼科(65.6%)、眼部整形(61.4%)和角膜(58.8%)。葡萄膜炎(45.4%)、青光眼(44.6%)和视网膜手术(32.8%)被认为是女性研究员占少数的亚专科(50%)。内科视网膜和肿瘤学/病理学的研究员人数相当(50%)。在所考察的九个研究室中,女性研究室主任在六个研究室中仍占少数(50%),这六个研究室是:神经眼科、眼整形、角膜、青光眼、外科视网膜和肿瘤/病理学。女性研究员占主导地位的亚专科中,女性研究项目主任的比例(40.2%)高于女性研究员占少数的亚专科(28.1%)(P = 0.0811*)。女性项目主任占主导地位的亚专科中,女性研究员的比例较高。未来的调查将重点关注研究金申请者以及项目主任的性别对各亚专科培训选择标准的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender analysis of ophthalmology fellowship program directors and trainees

Purpose

To determine the gender ratios of ophthalmology fellows and fellowship program directors.

Design

Quantitative cross-sectional study.

Methods

Programs were identified using the Association of University Professors of Ophthalmology (AUPO) and the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) websites. Programs were contacted via email survey to determine the gender of the current fellow(s) and fellowship program director in the academic year 2022–2023. Fisher's Exact Test* was undertaken to establish statistical significance (p < 0.05) between female program director percentages across fellowship subspecialties.

Results

220 out of 287 programs were analyzed: pediatrics (9.1 %), neuroophthalmology (9.5 %), cornea (13.2 %), oculoplastics (16.8 %), uveitis (4.1 %), glaucoma (18.6 %), surgical retina (24.1 %), medical retina (2.3 %), and oncology/pathology (2.3 %). Women fellow-dominated subspecialties (>50 %) included pediatric ophthalmology (69.4 %), neuro-ophthalmology (65.6 %), oculoplastics (61.4 %), and cornea (58.8 %). Uveitis (45.4 %), glaucoma (44.6 %), and surgical retina (32.8 %) were considered women fellow minority subspecialties (< 50 %). Medical retina and oncology/pathology had equal representation of fellows (50 %). Women fellowship directors remain in the minority (< 50 %) across six of the nine fellowships examined; neuro-ophthalmology, oculoplastics, cornea, glaucoma, surgical retina, and oncology/pathology. The women fellow-dominated subspecialties had higher rates of women fellowship program directors (40.2 %) versus women fellow minority subspecialties (28.1 %) (p = 0.0811*).

Conclusion

There is a lack of women representation throughout the ophthalmology fellowship program leadership. Subspecialties with predominant women program directors have higher women fellow representation. Future investigations will focus on fellowship applicants and the influence the gender of the program director may have on selection criteria for various subspecialty training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Intravitreal dexamethasone implant concomitant to cataract surgery in retinitis pigmentosa: potential retinal preservation effect FaceFinder: A machine learning tool for identification of facial images from heterogenous datasets Gender based differences in electronic medical record utilization in an academic ophthalmology practice Evolving practice patterns of young retinal specialists: A five-year comparison of treatment and surgical preferences Candida parapsilosis keratitis: A case series
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1