Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner , Jichen Yang , Brian C. Allen , Lisa M. Ho , Chad M. Miller , Maciej A. Mazurowski
{"title":"简化超声检查甲状腺结节的风险分层:人工智能甲状腺成像报告和数据系统的验证与性能","authors":"Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner , Jichen Yang , Brian C. Allen , Lisa M. Ho , Chad M. Miller , Maciej A. Mazurowski","doi":"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To validate the performance of a recently created risk stratification system (RSS) for thyroid nodules on ultrasound, the Artificial Intelligence Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (AI TI-RADS).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>378 thyroid nodules from 320 patients were included in this retrospective evaluation. All nodules had ultrasound images and had undergone fine needle aspiration (FNA). 147 nodules were Bethesda V or VI (suspicious or diagnostic for malignancy), and 231 were Bethesda II (benign). Three radiologists assigned features according to the AI TI-RADS lexicon (same categories and features as the American College of Radiology TI-RADS) to each nodule based on ultrasound images. FNA recommendations using AI TI-RADS and ACR TI-RADS were then compared and sensitivity and specificity for each RSS were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Across three readers, mean sensitivity of AI TI-RADS was lower than ACR TI-RADS (0.69 vs 0.72, p < 0.02), while mean specificity was higher (0.40 vs 0.37, p < 0.02). Overall total number of points assigned by all three readers decreased slightly when using AI TI-RADS (5,998 for AI TI-RADS vs 6,015 for ACR TI-RADS), including more values of 0 to several features.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>AI TI-RADS performed similarly to ACR TI-RADS while eliminating point assignments for many features, allowing for simplification of future TI-RADS versions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51617,"journal":{"name":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","volume":"53 6","pages":"Pages 695-699"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363018824001105/pdfft?md5=fe14e9d3f34bb79cf92b3bf4aa953afd&pid=1-s2.0-S0363018824001105-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplifying risk stratification for thyroid nodules on ultrasound: validation and performance of an artificial intelligence thyroid imaging reporting and data system\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Wildman-Tobriner , Jichen Yang , Brian C. Allen , Lisa M. Ho , Chad M. Miller , Maciej A. Mazurowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1067/j.cpradiol.2024.07.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To validate the performance of a recently created risk stratification system (RSS) for thyroid nodules on ultrasound, the Artificial Intelligence Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (AI TI-RADS).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>378 thyroid nodules from 320 patients were included in this retrospective evaluation. All nodules had ultrasound images and had undergone fine needle aspiration (FNA). 147 nodules were Bethesda V or VI (suspicious or diagnostic for malignancy), and 231 were Bethesda II (benign). Three radiologists assigned features according to the AI TI-RADS lexicon (same categories and features as the American College of Radiology TI-RADS) to each nodule based on ultrasound images. FNA recommendations using AI TI-RADS and ACR TI-RADS were then compared and sensitivity and specificity for each RSS were calculated.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Across three readers, mean sensitivity of AI TI-RADS was lower than ACR TI-RADS (0.69 vs 0.72, p < 0.02), while mean specificity was higher (0.40 vs 0.37, p < 0.02). Overall total number of points assigned by all three readers decreased slightly when using AI TI-RADS (5,998 for AI TI-RADS vs 6,015 for ACR TI-RADS), including more values of 0 to several features.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>AI TI-RADS performed similarly to ACR TI-RADS while eliminating point assignments for many features, allowing for simplification of future TI-RADS versions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology\",\"volume\":\"53 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 695-699\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363018824001105/pdfft?md5=fe14e9d3f34bb79cf92b3bf4aa953afd&pid=1-s2.0-S0363018824001105-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363018824001105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363018824001105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的 验证最近创建的甲状腺结节超声风险分层系统(RSS)--人工智能甲状腺成像报告和数据系统(AI TI-RADS)的性能。所有结节均有超声图像,并进行了细针穿刺(FNA)。147 个结节为 Bethesda V 或 VI(可疑或诊断为恶性),231 个为 Bethesda II(良性)。三位放射科医生根据超声图像,按照 AI TI-RADS 词典(与美国放射学会 TI-RADS 的类别和特征相同)为每个结节分配特征。然后比较了 AI TI-RADS 和 ACR TI-RADS 的 FNA 建议,并计算了每种 RSS 的灵敏度和特异性。结果在三位读者中,AI TI-RADS 的平均灵敏度低于 ACR TI-RADS(0.69 vs 0.72,p < 0.02),而平均特异性较高(0.40 vs 0.37,p < 0.02)。使用 AI TI-RADS 时,三位读者分配的总点数略有减少(AI TI-RADS 为 5,998 点 vs ACR TI-RADS 为 6,015 点),其中包括更多特征值为 0 的情况。
Simplifying risk stratification for thyroid nodules on ultrasound: validation and performance of an artificial intelligence thyroid imaging reporting and data system
Purpose
To validate the performance of a recently created risk stratification system (RSS) for thyroid nodules on ultrasound, the Artificial Intelligence Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (AI TI-RADS).
Materials and methods
378 thyroid nodules from 320 patients were included in this retrospective evaluation. All nodules had ultrasound images and had undergone fine needle aspiration (FNA). 147 nodules were Bethesda V or VI (suspicious or diagnostic for malignancy), and 231 were Bethesda II (benign). Three radiologists assigned features according to the AI TI-RADS lexicon (same categories and features as the American College of Radiology TI-RADS) to each nodule based on ultrasound images. FNA recommendations using AI TI-RADS and ACR TI-RADS were then compared and sensitivity and specificity for each RSS were calculated.
Results
Across three readers, mean sensitivity of AI TI-RADS was lower than ACR TI-RADS (0.69 vs 0.72, p < 0.02), while mean specificity was higher (0.40 vs 0.37, p < 0.02). Overall total number of points assigned by all three readers decreased slightly when using AI TI-RADS (5,998 for AI TI-RADS vs 6,015 for ACR TI-RADS), including more values of 0 to several features.
Conclusion
AI TI-RADS performed similarly to ACR TI-RADS while eliminating point assignments for many features, allowing for simplification of future TI-RADS versions.
期刊介绍:
Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology covers important and controversial topics in radiology. Each issue presents important viewpoints from leading radiologists. High-quality reproductions of radiographs, CT scans, MR images, and sonograms clearly depict what is being described in each article. Also included are valuable updates relevant to other areas of practice, such as medical-legal issues or archiving systems. With new multi-topic format and image-intensive style, Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology offers an outstanding, time-saving investigation into current topics most relevant to radiologists.