358 推动腹主动脉瘤的血管内解决方案:使用瘘管 Anaconda 内移植物的 9 年国际经验

IF 8.6 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY British Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1093/bjs/znae163.194
M. Jubouri, A. O. Surkhi, S. Tan, I. Williams, M. Bashir
{"title":"358 推动腹主动脉瘤的血管内解决方案:使用瘘管 Anaconda 内移植物的 9 年国际经验","authors":"M. Jubouri, A. O. Surkhi, S. Tan, I. Williams, M. Bashir","doi":"10.1093/bjs/znae163.194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has become the mainstay treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms and is associated with optimal outcomes. However, there remains a risk of complications requiring reintervention. Several EVAR devices exist commercially, yet, the Fenestrated Anaconda™ (FA) has demonstrated outstanding results. This study aims to presents a 9-year cross-sectional international analysis of custom-made FA outcomes.\n \n \n \n Patient data was collected prospectively in 27 countries over 9 years and stored in an international registry. This was later retrieved and analysed retrospectively.\n \n \n \n A total of 5058 patients received the FA endograft. This was indicated either due to complex anatomy for competitor devices (n = 3891, 76.9%) or based on surgeon preference (n = 1167, 23.1%). Overall, the FA was utilised to rescue 2987 (59%) failed previous EVARs. The predominant device category and proximal ring stent configuration were bifurcate (83.6%) and standard (64.5%). Most devices were delivered within 6-8 weeks (55.4%) of diagnosis and 95% came with a prototype. As for clinical outcomes, both survival and TVP were 100% during the first 6 postoperative years but dropped to 77.1% and 81% thereafter. A sac regression of 0-30% was observed in 4772 (94.3%) patients over the first 4 years, whilst all patients had 20-45% sac regression in years 5-9 of follow-up. No cases of endograft migration or reintervention were recorded. All clinical outcomes were further stratified by indication group.\n \n \n \n The custom-made FA endograft features a highly unique and innovative design which enables it to treat highly complex aortic anatomy while achieving favourable results.\n","PeriodicalId":136,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"358 Driving Endovascular Solutions for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A 9-Year International Experience with the Fenestrated Anaconda Endograft\",\"authors\":\"M. Jubouri, A. O. Surkhi, S. Tan, I. Williams, M. Bashir\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjs/znae163.194\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has become the mainstay treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms and is associated with optimal outcomes. However, there remains a risk of complications requiring reintervention. Several EVAR devices exist commercially, yet, the Fenestrated Anaconda™ (FA) has demonstrated outstanding results. This study aims to presents a 9-year cross-sectional international analysis of custom-made FA outcomes.\\n \\n \\n \\n Patient data was collected prospectively in 27 countries over 9 years and stored in an international registry. This was later retrieved and analysed retrospectively.\\n \\n \\n \\n A total of 5058 patients received the FA endograft. This was indicated either due to complex anatomy for competitor devices (n = 3891, 76.9%) or based on surgeon preference (n = 1167, 23.1%). Overall, the FA was utilised to rescue 2987 (59%) failed previous EVARs. The predominant device category and proximal ring stent configuration were bifurcate (83.6%) and standard (64.5%). Most devices were delivered within 6-8 weeks (55.4%) of diagnosis and 95% came with a prototype. As for clinical outcomes, both survival and TVP were 100% during the first 6 postoperative years but dropped to 77.1% and 81% thereafter. A sac regression of 0-30% was observed in 4772 (94.3%) patients over the first 4 years, whilst all patients had 20-45% sac regression in years 5-9 of follow-up. No cases of endograft migration or reintervention were recorded. All clinical outcomes were further stratified by indication group.\\n \\n \\n \\n The custom-made FA endograft features a highly unique and innovative design which enables it to treat highly complex aortic anatomy while achieving favourable results.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae163.194\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjs/znae163.194","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血管内主动脉修补术(EVAR)已成为腹主动脉瘤的主要治疗方法,并可获得最佳疗效。然而,并发症的风险仍然存在,需要再次进行手术。目前市场上有多种 EVAR 装置,但 Fenestrated Anaconda™ (FA) 已取得了杰出的疗效。本研究旨在对定制的 FA 进行为期 9 年的横断面国际分析。 在 9 年的时间里,在 27 个国家前瞻性地收集了患者数据,并将其保存在国际登记册中。随后对这些数据进行了检索和回顾性分析。 共有 5058 名患者接受了 FA 内植物移植。接受FA内植物移植的原因有两种,一种是竞争对手的设备解剖结构复杂(3891例,占76.9%),另一种是外科医生的偏好(1167例,占23.1%)。总体而言,FA 被用于抢救 2987 例(59%)既往失败的 EVAR。最主要的装置类别和近端环形支架配置是分叉型(83.6%)和标准型(64.5%)。大多数设备在确诊后 6-8 周内交付(55.4%),95% 的设备带有原型。至于临床结果,术后前 6 年的存活率和 TVP 均为 100%,但之后分别降至 77.1% 和 81%。4772例(94.3%)患者在术后前4年的囊消退率为0-30%,而所有患者在术后第5-9年的囊消退率均为20-45%。没有记录到内移植物移位或再次介入的病例。所有临床结果均按适应症组进行了进一步分层。 定制的 FA 内植物移植具有非常独特的创新设计,使其能够治疗高度复杂的主动脉解剖,并取得良好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
358 Driving Endovascular Solutions for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A 9-Year International Experience with the Fenestrated Anaconda Endograft
Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has become the mainstay treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms and is associated with optimal outcomes. However, there remains a risk of complications requiring reintervention. Several EVAR devices exist commercially, yet, the Fenestrated Anaconda™ (FA) has demonstrated outstanding results. This study aims to presents a 9-year cross-sectional international analysis of custom-made FA outcomes. Patient data was collected prospectively in 27 countries over 9 years and stored in an international registry. This was later retrieved and analysed retrospectively. A total of 5058 patients received the FA endograft. This was indicated either due to complex anatomy for competitor devices (n = 3891, 76.9%) or based on surgeon preference (n = 1167, 23.1%). Overall, the FA was utilised to rescue 2987 (59%) failed previous EVARs. The predominant device category and proximal ring stent configuration were bifurcate (83.6%) and standard (64.5%). Most devices were delivered within 6-8 weeks (55.4%) of diagnosis and 95% came with a prototype. As for clinical outcomes, both survival and TVP were 100% during the first 6 postoperative years but dropped to 77.1% and 81% thereafter. A sac regression of 0-30% was observed in 4772 (94.3%) patients over the first 4 years, whilst all patients had 20-45% sac regression in years 5-9 of follow-up. No cases of endograft migration or reintervention were recorded. All clinical outcomes were further stratified by indication group. The custom-made FA endograft features a highly unique and innovative design which enables it to treat highly complex aortic anatomy while achieving favourable results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1102
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Surgery (BJS), incorporating the European Journal of Surgery, stands as Europe's leading peer-reviewed surgical journal. It serves as an invaluable platform for presenting high-quality clinical and laboratory-based research across a wide range of surgical topics. In addition to providing a comprehensive coverage of traditional surgical practices, BJS also showcases emerging areas in the field, such as minimally invasive therapy and interventional radiology. While the journal appeals to general surgeons, it also holds relevance for specialty surgeons and professionals working in closely related fields. By presenting cutting-edge research and advancements, BJS aims to revolutionize the way surgical knowledge is shared and contribute to the ongoing progress of the surgical community.
期刊最新文献
Curative-intent ablation margins (A0) for colorectal liver metastasis: more burning questions. Disease-specific survival outcomes for patients after locoregional treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: observational cohort study. Effect of tailoring biliopancreatic limb length based on total small bowel length versus standard limb length in one anastomosis gastric bypass: 1-year outcomes of the TAILOR randomized clinical superiority trial. Identification of A0 minimum ablative margins for colorectal liver metastases: multicentre, retrospective study using deformable CT registration and artificial intelligence-based autosegmentation. Neoadjuvant 177Lu-DOTATATE for non-functioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (NEOLUPANET): multicentre phase II study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1