认知刺激疗法与回忆疗法对轻度认知障碍老年人认知和心理结果的影响:一项准实验研究

Doaa Abd Elmawla, Sally Ibrahim, Eman Radwan, D. Elzehiri, Heba El fadawy
{"title":"认知刺激疗法与回忆疗法对轻度认知障碍老年人认知和心理结果的影响:一项准实验研究","authors":"Doaa Abd Elmawla, Sally Ibrahim, Eman Radwan, D. Elzehiri, Heba El fadawy","doi":"10.21608/niles.2024.353919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The aging population is the most significant demographic phenomena that the world has seen in recent decades, which in turn resulted in a sharp rise in the number of older people. Consequently, these data anticipate a reduction in expected years of active and healthy life and a rise in age associated with gradual deterioration of physical and mental health. Cognitive frailty is recognized as a precursor to major health conditions. Early identification and cognitive intervention programs can potentially preventing or reversing this decline in cognitive function. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive stimulation therapy versus reminiscence therapy on cognitive and psychological outcomes in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Design: A Quasi-experimental study was followed to conduct this study. Setting: The study was conducted in two elderly clubs namely El-Saada and El-Amal elderly club in Mansoura city. Subjects: A total of 60 older adults with mild cognitive impairment were included in the study and randomly assigned to three equal groups; cognitive stimulation therapy group, reminiscence therapy group and control group. Tools: The data were collected through demographic and health-related characteristics interview sheet, montreal cognitive assessment, psychological wellbeing scale-18, the satisfaction with life scale and one question to assess participants’ satisfaction with the program. Results: A significant increase in cognitive function and psychological outcomes were evident among the cognitive stimulation group and reminiscence group after implementation of the intervention when compared to pre intervention and the control group (p<0.05). Conclusion: The application of either cognitive stimulation therapy or reminiscence therapy is effective strategy in improving cognitive and psychological outcomes of older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Recommendation: The health care providers should be encouraged to incorporate such programs as non-pharmacological interventions in routine care of older adults residing either in the community or institutions to preserve their cognitive and psychological health.","PeriodicalId":294863,"journal":{"name":"NILES journal for Geriatric and Gerontology","volume":"100 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy versus Reminiscence Therapy on Cognitive and Psychological Outcomes in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Quasi-Experimental Study\",\"authors\":\"Doaa Abd Elmawla, Sally Ibrahim, Eman Radwan, D. Elzehiri, Heba El fadawy\",\"doi\":\"10.21608/niles.2024.353919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The aging population is the most significant demographic phenomena that the world has seen in recent decades, which in turn resulted in a sharp rise in the number of older people. Consequently, these data anticipate a reduction in expected years of active and healthy life and a rise in age associated with gradual deterioration of physical and mental health. Cognitive frailty is recognized as a precursor to major health conditions. Early identification and cognitive intervention programs can potentially preventing or reversing this decline in cognitive function. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive stimulation therapy versus reminiscence therapy on cognitive and psychological outcomes in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Design: A Quasi-experimental study was followed to conduct this study. Setting: The study was conducted in two elderly clubs namely El-Saada and El-Amal elderly club in Mansoura city. Subjects: A total of 60 older adults with mild cognitive impairment were included in the study and randomly assigned to three equal groups; cognitive stimulation therapy group, reminiscence therapy group and control group. Tools: The data were collected through demographic and health-related characteristics interview sheet, montreal cognitive assessment, psychological wellbeing scale-18, the satisfaction with life scale and one question to assess participants’ satisfaction with the program. Results: A significant increase in cognitive function and psychological outcomes were evident among the cognitive stimulation group and reminiscence group after implementation of the intervention when compared to pre intervention and the control group (p<0.05). Conclusion: The application of either cognitive stimulation therapy or reminiscence therapy is effective strategy in improving cognitive and psychological outcomes of older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Recommendation: The health care providers should be encouraged to incorporate such programs as non-pharmacological interventions in routine care of older adults residing either in the community or institutions to preserve their cognitive and psychological health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":294863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NILES journal for Geriatric and Gerontology\",\"volume\":\"100 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NILES journal for Geriatric and Gerontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21608/niles.2024.353919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NILES journal for Geriatric and Gerontology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/niles.2024.353919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:人口老龄化是近几十年来世界上出现的最重要的人口现象,而人口老龄化又导致了老年人数量的急剧上升。因此,这些数据预示着活跃和健康生活的预期年限将减少,年龄的增加与身体和精神健康的逐渐恶化有关。认知虚弱被认为是主要健康问题的前兆。早期识别和认知干预计划有可能预防或逆转认知功能的衰退。目的:本研究旨在评估认知刺激疗法与回忆疗法对轻度认知障碍老年人认知和心理结果的影响。设计:本研究采用准实验研究方法。研究地点研究在曼苏拉市的 El-Saada 和 El-Amal 两家老年俱乐部进行。研究对象:共有 60 名患有轻度认知障碍的老年人参与研究,并随机分配到三个相同的小组:认知刺激疗法组、回忆疗法组和对照组。研究工具:通过人口统计学和健康相关特征访谈表、蒙特利尔认知评估、心理健康量表-18、生活满意度量表和一个评估参与者对项目满意度的问题收集数据。结果显示与干预前和对照组相比,实施干预后,认知刺激组和回忆组的认知功能和心理成果明显增加(P<0.05)。结论应用认知刺激疗法或回忆疗法是改善轻度认知障碍老年人认知和心理结果的有效策略。建议:应鼓励医疗服务提供者在为居住在社区或养老院的老年人提供日常护理时,将此类项目作为非药物干预措施,以保护他们的认知和心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of Cognitive Stimulation Therapy versus Reminiscence Therapy on Cognitive and Psychological Outcomes in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Quasi-Experimental Study
Background: The aging population is the most significant demographic phenomena that the world has seen in recent decades, which in turn resulted in a sharp rise in the number of older people. Consequently, these data anticipate a reduction in expected years of active and healthy life and a rise in age associated with gradual deterioration of physical and mental health. Cognitive frailty is recognized as a precursor to major health conditions. Early identification and cognitive intervention programs can potentially preventing or reversing this decline in cognitive function. Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of cognitive stimulation therapy versus reminiscence therapy on cognitive and psychological outcomes in older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Design: A Quasi-experimental study was followed to conduct this study. Setting: The study was conducted in two elderly clubs namely El-Saada and El-Amal elderly club in Mansoura city. Subjects: A total of 60 older adults with mild cognitive impairment were included in the study and randomly assigned to three equal groups; cognitive stimulation therapy group, reminiscence therapy group and control group. Tools: The data were collected through demographic and health-related characteristics interview sheet, montreal cognitive assessment, psychological wellbeing scale-18, the satisfaction with life scale and one question to assess participants’ satisfaction with the program. Results: A significant increase in cognitive function and psychological outcomes were evident among the cognitive stimulation group and reminiscence group after implementation of the intervention when compared to pre intervention and the control group (p<0.05). Conclusion: The application of either cognitive stimulation therapy or reminiscence therapy is effective strategy in improving cognitive and psychological outcomes of older adults with mild cognitive impairment. Recommendation: The health care providers should be encouraged to incorporate such programs as non-pharmacological interventions in routine care of older adults residing either in the community or institutions to preserve their cognitive and psychological health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Electromagnetic and Heating Therapy for Longevity Effect of Reflexology versus Aerobic Training on Insomnia Severity Index and Quality of Life in Hypertensive Patients The Effects of Health Promotion Program on Healthy Aging, Wellbeing and Health Promoting Behaviour among Community Dwelling Older Adults Detection of Risk for Foot Ulceration and its Relation to Foot Self-care among Diabetic Elderly Patients Effect of Cryolipolysis on Insulin Resistance in Type 2 Diabetic Females with Abdominal Obesity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1