西格玛指标--评估临床化学实验室分析绩效的质量控制指南

Lincy Raj C, Poornima RT, Malawadi BN
{"title":"西格玛指标--评估临床化学实验室分析绩效的质量控制指南","authors":"Lincy Raj C, Poornima RT, Malawadi BN","doi":"10.3126/ajms.v15i7.64838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Clinical laboratories function to deliver accurate, reliable, and timely reported results which are used in decision-making, diagnosis, and monitoring. Sigma metrics help to assess analytic methodologies and provide benchmarks for laboratories to design protocols for internal quality control (IQC), address poor assay performance, and assess the efficiency of existing laboratory processes. Thus, this study was undertaken to estimate the coefficient of variation (CV%), bias%, and total allowable error (TEa) of quality control (QC) samples using EM 200, to compare the TEa using Clinical Laboratories Improvement Act (CLIA) guidelines, and to analyze the sigma metrics of level 1 QC samples.\nAims and Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study are to estimate the CV%, Bias%, TEa of QC samples using EM 200, to compare the TEa using CLIA guidelines, and to analyze the sigma metrics of level 1 QC samples.\nMaterials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in the Central Biochemistry Lab, Karwar Institute of Medical Sciences, Karwar. IQC data level 1 of 15 analytes was analyzed using EM200 for 3 months. CV% is calculated from internal quality data, whereas bias% is obtained from an external quality assurance program. Sigma metrics were calculated using bias% and CV%. TEa was calculated and compared with CLIA guidelines.\nResults: We have < 3 sigma values (unstable, unacceptable) for urea, creatinine, BID, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT), protein, cholesterol, calcium, 3–6 (ideal) for glucose, uric acid, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, high-density lipoprotein, and >6 (excellent) for triglycerides. TEa observed less than or close to CLIA suggests quality requirement met, and TEa observed more than CLIA (urea, creatinine, BID, SGPT, protein, and calcium) suggests methodologies need evaluation.\nConclusion: Sigma metrics help to assess analytical methodologies and augment laboratory performance. Each and every laboratory can use sigma metrics as a guideline for QC strategy and a self-assessment tool for proper functioning.","PeriodicalId":8522,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sigma metrics – a good quality control guide to assess analytical performance of a clinical chemistry laboratory\",\"authors\":\"Lincy Raj C, Poornima RT, Malawadi BN\",\"doi\":\"10.3126/ajms.v15i7.64838\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Clinical laboratories function to deliver accurate, reliable, and timely reported results which are used in decision-making, diagnosis, and monitoring. Sigma metrics help to assess analytic methodologies and provide benchmarks for laboratories to design protocols for internal quality control (IQC), address poor assay performance, and assess the efficiency of existing laboratory processes. Thus, this study was undertaken to estimate the coefficient of variation (CV%), bias%, and total allowable error (TEa) of quality control (QC) samples using EM 200, to compare the TEa using Clinical Laboratories Improvement Act (CLIA) guidelines, and to analyze the sigma metrics of level 1 QC samples.\\nAims and Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study are to estimate the CV%, Bias%, TEa of QC samples using EM 200, to compare the TEa using CLIA guidelines, and to analyze the sigma metrics of level 1 QC samples.\\nMaterials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in the Central Biochemistry Lab, Karwar Institute of Medical Sciences, Karwar. IQC data level 1 of 15 analytes was analyzed using EM200 for 3 months. CV% is calculated from internal quality data, whereas bias% is obtained from an external quality assurance program. Sigma metrics were calculated using bias% and CV%. TEa was calculated and compared with CLIA guidelines.\\nResults: We have < 3 sigma values (unstable, unacceptable) for urea, creatinine, BID, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT), protein, cholesterol, calcium, 3–6 (ideal) for glucose, uric acid, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, high-density lipoprotein, and >6 (excellent) for triglycerides. TEa observed less than or close to CLIA suggests quality requirement met, and TEa observed more than CLIA (urea, creatinine, BID, SGPT, protein, and calcium) suggests methodologies need evaluation.\\nConclusion: Sigma metrics help to assess analytical methodologies and augment laboratory performance. Each and every laboratory can use sigma metrics as a guideline for QC strategy and a self-assessment tool for proper functioning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v15i7.64838\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/ajms.v15i7.64838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:临床实验室的职能是提供准确、可靠、及时的报告结果,用于决策、诊断和监测。西格玛指标有助于评估分析方法,并为实验室设计内部质量控制(IQC)方案、解决化验结果不佳问题以及评估现有实验室流程的效率提供基准。因此,本研究使用 EM 200 估算质量控制(QC)样本的变异系数(CV%)、偏差(bias%)和总允许误差(TEa),使用《临床实验室改进法案》(CLIA)指南比较 TEa,并分析 1 级 QC 样品的西格玛指标:本研究的目的和目标是使用 EM 200 估算质控样本的 CV%、Bias% 和 TEa,使用 CLIA 指南比较 TEa,并分析 1 级质控样本的西格玛指标:在卡尔瓦医学科学研究所的中央生化实验室进行了一项横断面研究。使用 EM200 对 15 种分析物的 IQC 一级数据进行了为期 3 个月的分析。CV% 是根据内部质量数据计算得出的,而 bias% 则是从外部质量保证计划中获得的。利用偏差率和 CV% 计算西格玛指标。计算出 TEa,并与 CLIA 指南进行比较:尿素、肌酐、BID、血清谷草转氨酶、血清谷氨酸丙酮酸转氨酶(SGPT)、蛋白质、胆固醇、钙的西格玛值小于 3(不稳定,不可接受),葡萄糖、尿酸、总胆红素、碱性磷酸酶、白蛋白、高密度脂蛋白的西格玛值为 3-6(理想),甘油三酯的西格玛值大于 6(优秀)。观察到的 TEa 小于或接近 CLIA 表明符合质量要求,而观察到的 TEa 高于 CLIA(尿素、肌酐、BID、SGPT、蛋白质和钙)则表明需要对方法进行评估:西格玛指标有助于评估分析方法和提高实验室绩效。每个实验室都可以使用西格玛指标作为质量控制策略的指导和自我评估工具,以确保正常运行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sigma metrics – a good quality control guide to assess analytical performance of a clinical chemistry laboratory
Background: Clinical laboratories function to deliver accurate, reliable, and timely reported results which are used in decision-making, diagnosis, and monitoring. Sigma metrics help to assess analytic methodologies and provide benchmarks for laboratories to design protocols for internal quality control (IQC), address poor assay performance, and assess the efficiency of existing laboratory processes. Thus, this study was undertaken to estimate the coefficient of variation (CV%), bias%, and total allowable error (TEa) of quality control (QC) samples using EM 200, to compare the TEa using Clinical Laboratories Improvement Act (CLIA) guidelines, and to analyze the sigma metrics of level 1 QC samples. Aims and Objectives: The aims and objectives of the study are to estimate the CV%, Bias%, TEa of QC samples using EM 200, to compare the TEa using CLIA guidelines, and to analyze the sigma metrics of level 1 QC samples. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out in the Central Biochemistry Lab, Karwar Institute of Medical Sciences, Karwar. IQC data level 1 of 15 analytes was analyzed using EM200 for 3 months. CV% is calculated from internal quality data, whereas bias% is obtained from an external quality assurance program. Sigma metrics were calculated using bias% and CV%. TEa was calculated and compared with CLIA guidelines. Results: We have < 3 sigma values (unstable, unacceptable) for urea, creatinine, BID, serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase, serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase (SGPT), protein, cholesterol, calcium, 3–6 (ideal) for glucose, uric acid, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, high-density lipoprotein, and >6 (excellent) for triglycerides. TEa observed less than or close to CLIA suggests quality requirement met, and TEa observed more than CLIA (urea, creatinine, BID, SGPT, protein, and calcium) suggests methodologies need evaluation. Conclusion: Sigma metrics help to assess analytical methodologies and augment laboratory performance. Each and every laboratory can use sigma metrics as a guideline for QC strategy and a self-assessment tool for proper functioning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
A comparative study of efficacy of intravenous dexmedetomidine with perineural dexmedetomidine as adjuvant to ropivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block in upper limb surgery Efficacy and safety of low-dose celecoxib with chemoradiation in locally advanced head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma Comparison between mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intra renal surgery for the management of lower calyceal calculi of size less than 1.5 cm : Our institutional experience A study on clinicoradiological profile of patients with hydropneumothorax in a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India Role of low-dose deflazacort with tamsulosin versus tamsulosin alone for medical expulsive therapy of ureteric stone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1