Billy I. Kim MD, Kevin A. Wu BS, Emily J. Luo BS, Nicholas J. Morriss MD, Grant H. Cabell MD, Trevor A. Lentz PT, PhD, MPH, Brian C. Lau MD
{"title":"肩部手术患者转诊预测和结果黄旗工具的最佳筛查与患者报告的遗留结果测量之间的相关性","authors":"Billy I. Kim MD, Kevin A. Wu BS, Emily J. Luo BS, Nicholas J. Morriss MD, Grant H. Cabell MD, Trevor A. Lentz PT, PhD, MPH, Brian C. Lau MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.06.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) Tool is a 10-item multidimensional screening tool utilized to evaluate pain-related psychological traits in individuals with musculoskeletal pain conditions. The validity of postoperatively collected OSPRO-YF is unclear. This study sought to assess validity of the OSPRO-YF by comparing it to patient-reported outcome scores in both preoperative and postoperative settings.</p></div><div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><p>The authors hypothesized that OSPRO-YF overall score would correlate with shoulder and global function PROs at preoperative and postoperative timepoints.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A review of 101 patients undergoing shoulder surgery by one sports medicine orthopedic surgeon at a large academic institution was conducted. 90 and 54 patients had complete preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome responses. OSPRO-YF, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Evaluation Form, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computer Adaptive Test (PROMIS-CAT) were routinely administered before and after surgery at the senior author’s clinic visits. Concurrent validity of OSPRO-YF at either timepoint was assessed by comparing scores with PROs cross-sectionally using Pearson correlations and multiple comparison corrections.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Preoperatively, higher OSPRO-YF total score was associated with greater concurrent PROMIS-CAT Pain Interference (r = 0.43; <em>P</em> < .01) and Depression (r = 0.36; <em>P</em> = .05) and lower ASES (r = −0.34; <em>P</em> < .01). Higher postoperative OSPRO-YF was also associated with greater concurrent PROMIS-CAT Pain Interference (r = 0.43; <em>P</em> < .01) and Depression (r = 0.36; <em>P</em> < .01) and lower ASES (r = −0.34; <em>P</em> = .01). ASES had strong correlation with Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation and Pain scores at both preoperative and postoperative timepoints. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation was not significantly associated with OSPRO-YF total score or number of yellow flags at either timepoints.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study findings support the clinical validity of the 10-item OSPRO-YF tool when administered before or after shoulder surgery. For patients exhibiting suboptimal recovery or those identified as high risk at initial screening, assessment of pain-related psychological distress postoperatively may be particularly beneficial in guiding rehabilitation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324001622/pdfft?md5=7e9bb5308eb4bbc72db1733021b58d23&pid=1-s2.0-S2666638324001622-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between the optimal screening for prediction of referral and outcome yellow flag tool and patient-reported legacy outcome measures in patients undergoing shoulder surgery\",\"authors\":\"Billy I. Kim MD, Kevin A. Wu BS, Emily J. Luo BS, Nicholas J. Morriss MD, Grant H. Cabell MD, Trevor A. Lentz PT, PhD, MPH, Brian C. Lau MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jseint.2024.06.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) Tool is a 10-item multidimensional screening tool utilized to evaluate pain-related psychological traits in individuals with musculoskeletal pain conditions. The validity of postoperatively collected OSPRO-YF is unclear. This study sought to assess validity of the OSPRO-YF by comparing it to patient-reported outcome scores in both preoperative and postoperative settings.</p></div><div><h3>Hypothesis</h3><p>The authors hypothesized that OSPRO-YF overall score would correlate with shoulder and global function PROs at preoperative and postoperative timepoints.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A review of 101 patients undergoing shoulder surgery by one sports medicine orthopedic surgeon at a large academic institution was conducted. 90 and 54 patients had complete preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome responses. OSPRO-YF, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Evaluation Form, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computer Adaptive Test (PROMIS-CAT) were routinely administered before and after surgery at the senior author’s clinic visits. Concurrent validity of OSPRO-YF at either timepoint was assessed by comparing scores with PROs cross-sectionally using Pearson correlations and multiple comparison corrections.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Preoperatively, higher OSPRO-YF total score was associated with greater concurrent PROMIS-CAT Pain Interference (r = 0.43; <em>P</em> < .01) and Depression (r = 0.36; <em>P</em> = .05) and lower ASES (r = −0.34; <em>P</em> < .01). Higher postoperative OSPRO-YF was also associated with greater concurrent PROMIS-CAT Pain Interference (r = 0.43; <em>P</em> < .01) and Depression (r = 0.36; <em>P</em> < .01) and lower ASES (r = −0.34; <em>P</em> = .01). ASES had strong correlation with Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation and Pain scores at both preoperative and postoperative timepoints. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation was not significantly associated with OSPRO-YF total score or number of yellow flags at either timepoints.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The study findings support the clinical validity of the 10-item OSPRO-YF tool when administered before or after shoulder surgery. For patients exhibiting suboptimal recovery or those identified as high risk at initial screening, assessment of pain-related psychological distress postoperatively may be particularly beneficial in guiding rehabilitation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSES International\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324001622/pdfft?md5=7e9bb5308eb4bbc72db1733021b58d23&pid=1-s2.0-S2666638324001622-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSES International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324001622\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638324001622","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景转诊和结果黄旗预测最佳筛查(OSPRO-YF)工具是一种 10 个项目的多维筛查工具,用于评估肌肉骨骼疼痛患者与疼痛相关的心理特征。术后收集的 OSPRO-YF 的有效性尚不明确。本研究试图将 OSPRO-YF 与术前和术后患者报告的结果评分进行比较,以评估 OSPRO-YF 的有效性。作者假设 OSPRO-YF 总分与术前和术后时间点的肩关节和整体功能 PROs 相关。分别有 90 名和 54 名患者拥有完整的术前和术后患者报告结果。OSPRO-YF、美国肩肘外科医生(ASES)评估表和患者报告结果测量信息系统计算机适应性测试(PROMIS-CAT)在手术前后由资深作者出诊时进行常规管理。结果术前,较高的 OSPRO-YF 总分与较高的 PROMIS-CAT 疼痛干扰(r = 0.43; P < .01)和抑郁(r = 0.36; P = .05)以及较低的 ASES(r = -0.34; P < .01)相关。术后 OSPRO-YF 越高,同时 PROMIS-CAT 疼痛干扰(r = 0.43; P <.01)和抑郁(r = 0.36; P <.01)越大,ASES 越低(r = -0.34; P = .01)。在术前和术后的时间点上,ASES 与单次数值评估和疼痛评分都有很强的相关性。结论:研究结果表明,在肩关节手术前后使用 10 项 OSPRO-YF 工具具有临床有效性。对于恢复不理想的患者或初筛时被确定为高风险的患者,术后疼痛相关心理困扰的评估可能对指导康复特别有益。
Correlation between the optimal screening for prediction of referral and outcome yellow flag tool and patient-reported legacy outcome measures in patients undergoing shoulder surgery
Background
The Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome Yellow Flag (OSPRO-YF) Tool is a 10-item multidimensional screening tool utilized to evaluate pain-related psychological traits in individuals with musculoskeletal pain conditions. The validity of postoperatively collected OSPRO-YF is unclear. This study sought to assess validity of the OSPRO-YF by comparing it to patient-reported outcome scores in both preoperative and postoperative settings.
Hypothesis
The authors hypothesized that OSPRO-YF overall score would correlate with shoulder and global function PROs at preoperative and postoperative timepoints.
Methods
A review of 101 patients undergoing shoulder surgery by one sports medicine orthopedic surgeon at a large academic institution was conducted. 90 and 54 patients had complete preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome responses. OSPRO-YF, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Evaluation Form, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computer Adaptive Test (PROMIS-CAT) were routinely administered before and after surgery at the senior author’s clinic visits. Concurrent validity of OSPRO-YF at either timepoint was assessed by comparing scores with PROs cross-sectionally using Pearson correlations and multiple comparison corrections.
Results
Preoperatively, higher OSPRO-YF total score was associated with greater concurrent PROMIS-CAT Pain Interference (r = 0.43; P < .01) and Depression (r = 0.36; P = .05) and lower ASES (r = −0.34; P < .01). Higher postoperative OSPRO-YF was also associated with greater concurrent PROMIS-CAT Pain Interference (r = 0.43; P < .01) and Depression (r = 0.36; P < .01) and lower ASES (r = −0.34; P = .01). ASES had strong correlation with Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation and Pain scores at both preoperative and postoperative timepoints. Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation was not significantly associated with OSPRO-YF total score or number of yellow flags at either timepoints.
Conclusion
The study findings support the clinical validity of the 10-item OSPRO-YF tool when administered before or after shoulder surgery. For patients exhibiting suboptimal recovery or those identified as high risk at initial screening, assessment of pain-related psychological distress postoperatively may be particularly beneficial in guiding rehabilitation.