制度表演的动力:实用推理与象征价值之间--罗马古代的案例研究

IF 0.3 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS International Review of Pragmatics Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1163/18773109-01602001
Marco Mazzone
{"title":"制度表演的动力:实用推理与象征价值之间--罗马古代的案例研究","authors":"Marco Mazzone","doi":"10.1163/18773109-01602001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of the present paper is to analyze the dynamics of performatives, with special focus on normatively charged institutions as legal-political ones, with the help of a case study coming from Roman antiquity: the appointment of Julius Caesar as “perpetual dictator”, as it is analyzed by Licandro (2022). That analysis shows both how institutional performatives are established and how they are subject to tensions and changes in their course of application. On that basis, I will make two hypotheses. First, the power of legal-political performatives is (also) grounded in what I will call “symbolic value”: a special feature of certain linguistic expressions which is historically related to religious rituals. Second, symbolic value and practical (i.e., means-end) reasoning are not alternative explanations, they are partners both in establishing legal-political performatives and in driving their application through time.</p>","PeriodicalId":43536,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The dynamics of institutional performatives: Between practical reasoning and symbolic value—A case study from Roman antiquity\",\"authors\":\"Marco Mazzone\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/18773109-01602001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The purpose of the present paper is to analyze the dynamics of performatives, with special focus on normatively charged institutions as legal-political ones, with the help of a case study coming from Roman antiquity: the appointment of Julius Caesar as “perpetual dictator”, as it is analyzed by Licandro (2022). That analysis shows both how institutional performatives are established and how they are subject to tensions and changes in their course of application. On that basis, I will make two hypotheses. First, the power of legal-political performatives is (also) grounded in what I will call “symbolic value”: a special feature of certain linguistic expressions which is historically related to religious rituals. Second, symbolic value and practical (i.e., means-end) reasoning are not alternative explanations, they are partners both in establishing legal-political performatives and in driving their application through time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Review of Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Review of Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01602001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/18773109-01602001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是借助罗马古代的一个案例研究,即利坎德罗(2022 年)对凯撒大帝被任命为 "永久独裁者 "的分析,来分析表演者的动态,特别关注作为法律政治机构的规范性机构。这一分析表明了制度性表演是如何建立起来的,以及它们在应用过程中如何受到紧张和变化的影响。在此基础上,我将提出两个假设。首先,法律-政治表演的力量(也)基于我将称之为 "象征价值 "的东西:某些语言表达的特殊性,在历史上与宗教仪式有关。其次,符号价值和实践(即手段-目的)推理并非替代性解释,它们是建立法律-政治表演形式和推动其应用的合作伙伴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The dynamics of institutional performatives: Between practical reasoning and symbolic value—A case study from Roman antiquity

The purpose of the present paper is to analyze the dynamics of performatives, with special focus on normatively charged institutions as legal-political ones, with the help of a case study coming from Roman antiquity: the appointment of Julius Caesar as “perpetual dictator”, as it is analyzed by Licandro (2022). That analysis shows both how institutional performatives are established and how they are subject to tensions and changes in their course of application. On that basis, I will make two hypotheses. First, the power of legal-political performatives is (also) grounded in what I will call “symbolic value”: a special feature of certain linguistic expressions which is historically related to religious rituals. Second, symbolic value and practical (i.e., means-end) reasoning are not alternative explanations, they are partners both in establishing legal-political performatives and in driving their application through time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Review of Pragmatics
International Review of Pragmatics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
Between a world war and a home affair: Discourse constructions of Russia’s ‘special operation’ The cognitive mechanisms involved in the “DEGREE ADVERB + PROPER NAME” construction: Evaluating proposals from Construction Grammar and Formal Semantics The dynamics of institutional performatives: Between practical reasoning and symbolic value—A case study from Roman antiquity The meaning of a yawn Troubles talk and complaints in teacher-student interactions: Affiliative and disaffiliative reactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1