[新辅助免疫疗法联合化疗与单纯手术治疗局部晚期可切除非小细胞肺癌的短期疗效比较]。

Haitian Li, Qing Liu, Bin Li, Yuzhen Chen, Junping Lin, Yuqi Meng, Haiming Feng, Zhizhong Zheng, Yiming Hui
{"title":"[新辅助免疫疗法联合化疗与单纯手术治疗局部晚期可切除非小细胞肺癌的短期疗效比较]。","authors":"Haitian Li, Qing Liu, Bin Li, Yuzhen Chen, Junping Lin, Yuqi Meng, Haiming Feng, Zhizhong Zheng, Yiming Hui","doi":"10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.102.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer is the cancer with the highest incidence and mortality rates in China, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80%-85% of all malignant lung tumors. Currently, surgical treatment remains the primary treatment modality for lung cancer. In recent years, the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors for NSCLC has become a consensus, and neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) has shown promising efficacy and safety in early to intermediate stage NSCLC. However, there are fewer studies related to nICT for locally advanced NSCLC. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nICT therapy in locally advanced resectable NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>85 confirmed resectable stage IIIA and IIIB patients treated in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, from January 2021 to April 2024, were divided into the nICT group (n=32) and the surgery alone group (n=53). Clinical baseline data, perioperative indicators, postoperative complications, imaging response rate, pathological response rate, incidence of adverse events, and quality of life were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in clinical baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). Incidence of choosing thoracotomy was higher in the nICT group than in the surgery alone group (P=0.002). There were no significant differences in surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, number of dissected lymph nodes, duration of chest tube placement, postoperative hospital stay, and R0 resection rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The overall incidence of postoperative complications was 31.25% in the nICT group and 22.64% in the surgery alone group, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.380). In the nICT group, the objective response rate (ORR) was 84.38%, with 5 cases of complete response (CR)(15.63%), 22 cases of partial response (PR)(68.75%), 15 cases of pathological response rate (pCR)(46.88%), and 11 cases of major pathological reaponse (MPR) (34.38%). During nICT treatment, 12 cases (37.50%) experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events, no death induced by adverse events or immune related adverse events. Moreover, the symptoms of the patients were improved after nICT treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy shows promising efficacy in locally advanced resectable NSCLC, with manageable treatment-related adverse events. It is a safe and feasible neoadjuvant treatment modality for locally advanced resectable NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":39317,"journal":{"name":"中国肺癌杂志","volume":"27 6","pages":"421-430"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11258643/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparison of Short-term Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy and Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Resectable \\u2029Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].\",\"authors\":\"Haitian Li, Qing Liu, Bin Li, Yuzhen Chen, Junping Lin, Yuqi Meng, Haiming Feng, Zhizhong Zheng, Yiming Hui\",\"doi\":\"10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.102.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer is the cancer with the highest incidence and mortality rates in China, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80%-85% of all malignant lung tumors. Currently, surgical treatment remains the primary treatment modality for lung cancer. In recent years, the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors for NSCLC has become a consensus, and neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) has shown promising efficacy and safety in early to intermediate stage NSCLC. However, there are fewer studies related to nICT for locally advanced NSCLC. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nICT therapy in locally advanced resectable NSCLC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>85 confirmed resectable stage IIIA and IIIB patients treated in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, from January 2021 to April 2024, were divided into the nICT group (n=32) and the surgery alone group (n=53). Clinical baseline data, perioperative indicators, postoperative complications, imaging response rate, pathological response rate, incidence of adverse events, and quality of life were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in clinical baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). Incidence of choosing thoracotomy was higher in the nICT group than in the surgery alone group (P=0.002). There were no significant differences in surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, number of dissected lymph nodes, duration of chest tube placement, postoperative hospital stay, and R0 resection rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The overall incidence of postoperative complications was 31.25% in the nICT group and 22.64% in the surgery alone group, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.380). In the nICT group, the objective response rate (ORR) was 84.38%, with 5 cases of complete response (CR)(15.63%), 22 cases of partial response (PR)(68.75%), 15 cases of pathological response rate (pCR)(46.88%), and 11 cases of major pathological reaponse (MPR) (34.38%). During nICT treatment, 12 cases (37.50%) experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events, no death induced by adverse events or immune related adverse events. Moreover, the symptoms of the patients were improved after nICT treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy shows promising efficacy in locally advanced resectable NSCLC, with manageable treatment-related adverse events. It is a safe and feasible neoadjuvant treatment modality for locally advanced resectable NSCLC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国肺癌杂志\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"421-430\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11258643/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国肺癌杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.102.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国肺癌杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2024.102.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肺癌是中国发病率和死亡率最高的癌症:肺癌是中国发病率和死亡率最高的癌症,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)占所有肺部恶性肿瘤的 80%-85%。目前,手术治疗仍是肺癌的主要治疗方式。近年来,免疫检查点抑制剂治疗NSCLC的有效性已成为共识,新辅助免疫化疗(nICT)在早中期NSCLC中显示出良好的疗效和安全性。然而,有关新辅助免疫化疗治疗局部晚期NSCLC的研究较少。本研究旨在评估nICT治疗局部晚期可切除NSCLC的疗效和安全性。方法:将2021年1月至2024年4月在兰州大学第二医院胸外科接受治疗的85例确诊可切除的IIIA和IIIB期患者分为nICT组(32例)和单纯手术组(53例)。比较两组患者的临床基线数据、围手术期指标、术后并发症、影像学反应率、病理学反应率、不良反应发生率和生活质量:两组患者的临床基线数据差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。nICT 组选择开胸手术的发生率高于单纯手术组(P=0.002)。两组在手术时间、术中失血量、切除淋巴结数量、胸腔置管时间、术后住院时间和 R0 切除率方面无明显差异(P>0.05)。nICT 组术后并发症总发生率为 31.25%,单纯手术组为 22.64%,差异无统计学意义(P=0.380)。nICT组客观反应率(ORR)为84.38%,其中完全反应(CR)5例(15.63%),部分反应(PR)22例(68.75%),病理反应率(pCR)15例(46.88%),主要病理反应(MPR)11例(34.38%)。在 nICT 治疗过程中,有 12 例(37.50%)出现了 3 级治疗相关不良反应,无不良反应或免疫相关不良反应导致的死亡。此外,经过新辅助免疫疗法治疗后,患者的症状得到了改善:结论:新辅助免疫化疗对局部晚期可切除NSCLC具有良好疗效,且治疗相关不良反应可控。对于局部晚期可切除的NSCLC来说,这是一种安全可行的新辅助治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Comparison of Short-term Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy and Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Resectable 
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

Background: Lung cancer is the cancer with the highest incidence and mortality rates in China, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80%-85% of all malignant lung tumors. Currently, surgical treatment remains the primary treatment modality for lung cancer. In recent years, the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors for NSCLC has become a consensus, and neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (nICT) has shown promising efficacy and safety in early to intermediate stage NSCLC. However, there are fewer studies related to nICT for locally advanced NSCLC. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nICT therapy in locally advanced resectable NSCLC.

Methods: 85 confirmed resectable stage IIIA and IIIB patients treated in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Second Hospital of Lanzhou University, from January 2021 to April 2024, were divided into the nICT group (n=32) and the surgery alone group (n=53). Clinical baseline data, perioperative indicators, postoperative complications, imaging response rate, pathological response rate, incidence of adverse events, and quality of life were compared between the two groups.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in clinical baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). Incidence of choosing thoracotomy was higher in the nICT group than in the surgery alone group (P=0.002). There were no significant differences in surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, number of dissected lymph nodes, duration of chest tube placement, postoperative hospital stay, and R0 resection rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The overall incidence of postoperative complications was 31.25% in the nICT group and 22.64% in the surgery alone group, with no statistically significant difference (P=0.380). In the nICT group, the objective response rate (ORR) was 84.38%, with 5 cases of complete response (CR)(15.63%), 22 cases of partial response (PR)(68.75%), 15 cases of pathological response rate (pCR)(46.88%), and 11 cases of major pathological reaponse (MPR) (34.38%). During nICT treatment, 12 cases (37.50%) experienced grade 3 treatment-related adverse events, no death induced by adverse events or immune related adverse events. Moreover, the symptoms of the patients were improved after nICT treatment.

Conclusions: Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy shows promising efficacy in locally advanced resectable NSCLC, with manageable treatment-related adverse events. It is a safe and feasible neoadjuvant treatment modality for locally advanced resectable NSCLC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国肺癌杂志
中国肺癌杂志 Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5131
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Lung Cancer(CJLC, pISSN 1009-3419, eISSN 1999-6187), a monthly Open Access journal, is hosted by Chinese Anti-Cancer Association, Chinese Antituberculosis Association, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital. CJLC was indexed in DOAJ, EMBASE/SCOPUS, Chemical Abstract(CA), CSA-Biological Science, HINARI, EBSCO-CINAHL,CABI Abstract, Global Health, CNKI, etc. Editor-in-Chief: Professor Qinghua ZHOU.
期刊最新文献
[A Case Report of EGFR-TKIs Resistant Secondary MET Gene Amplified 
Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Literature Review]. [Advances of Neoadjuvant Targeted Therapy in ALK-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]. [Application of Nano-drug Delivery Technology in Overcoming Drug Resistance 
in Lung Cancer]. [Clinicopathological Analysis of 14 Cases of Primary Pulmonary Lymphoepithelial Carcinoma]. [Immunotherapy for Extensive-stage Small Cell Lung Cancer: 
Research Progress and Future Perspectives].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1