医疗补助患者的疼痛治疗和阿片类药物使用障碍风险。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL American Journal of Preventive Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1016/j.amepre.2024.07.006
Kara E. Rudolph PhD, MPH, MHS , Nicholas T. Williams MPH , Ivan Diaz PhD , Sarah Forrest MPH , Katherine L. Hoffman MPH , Hillary Samples PhD , Mark Olfson MD, MPH , Lisa Doan MD , Magdalena Cerda DrPH , Rachael K. Ross PhD, MPH
{"title":"医疗补助患者的疼痛治疗和阿片类药物使用障碍风险。","authors":"Kara E. Rudolph PhD, MPH, MHS ,&nbsp;Nicholas T. Williams MPH ,&nbsp;Ivan Diaz PhD ,&nbsp;Sarah Forrest MPH ,&nbsp;Katherine L. Hoffman MPH ,&nbsp;Hillary Samples PhD ,&nbsp;Mark Olfson MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Lisa Doan MD ,&nbsp;Magdalena Cerda DrPH ,&nbsp;Rachael K. Ross PhD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>People with chronic pain are at increased risk of opioid misuse. Less is known about the unique risk conferred by each pain management treatment, as treatments are typically implemented together, confounding their independent effects. This study estimated the extent to which pain management treatments were associated with risk of opioid use disorder (OUD) for those with chronic pain, controlling for baseline demographic and clinical confounding variables and holding other pain management treatments at their observed levels.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were analyzed in 2024 from 2 chronic pain subgroups within a cohort of non-pregnant Medicaid patients aged 35–64 years, 2016–2019, from 25 states: those with (1) chronic pain and physical disability (CPPD) (N=6,133) or (2) chronic pain without disability (CP) (N=67,438). Nine pain management treatments were considered: prescription opioid (1) dose and (2) duration; (3) number of opioid prescribers; opioid co-prescription with (4) benzo- diazepines, (5) muscle relaxants, and (6) gabapentinoids; (7) nonopioid pain prescription, (8) physical therapy, and (9) other pain treatment modality. The outcome was OUD risk.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Having opioids co-prescribed with gabapentin or benzodiazepine was statistically significantly associated with a 37–45% increased OUD risk for the CP subgroup. Opioid dose and duration also were significantly associated with increased OUD risk in this subgroup. Physical therapy was significantly associated with an 18% <em>decreased</em> risk of OUD in the CP subgroup.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Coprescription of opioids with either gabapentin or benzodiazepines may substantially increase OUD risk. More positively, physical therapy may be a relatively accessible and safe pain management strategy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":"67 6","pages":"Pages 878-886"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Management Treatments and Opioid Use Disorder Risk in Medicaid Patients\",\"authors\":\"Kara E. Rudolph PhD, MPH, MHS ,&nbsp;Nicholas T. Williams MPH ,&nbsp;Ivan Diaz PhD ,&nbsp;Sarah Forrest MPH ,&nbsp;Katherine L. Hoffman MPH ,&nbsp;Hillary Samples PhD ,&nbsp;Mark Olfson MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Lisa Doan MD ,&nbsp;Magdalena Cerda DrPH ,&nbsp;Rachael K. Ross PhD, MPH\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amepre.2024.07.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>People with chronic pain are at increased risk of opioid misuse. Less is known about the unique risk conferred by each pain management treatment, as treatments are typically implemented together, confounding their independent effects. This study estimated the extent to which pain management treatments were associated with risk of opioid use disorder (OUD) for those with chronic pain, controlling for baseline demographic and clinical confounding variables and holding other pain management treatments at their observed levels.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were analyzed in 2024 from 2 chronic pain subgroups within a cohort of non-pregnant Medicaid patients aged 35–64 years, 2016–2019, from 25 states: those with (1) chronic pain and physical disability (CPPD) (N=6,133) or (2) chronic pain without disability (CP) (N=67,438). Nine pain management treatments were considered: prescription opioid (1) dose and (2) duration; (3) number of opioid prescribers; opioid co-prescription with (4) benzo- diazepines, (5) muscle relaxants, and (6) gabapentinoids; (7) nonopioid pain prescription, (8) physical therapy, and (9) other pain treatment modality. The outcome was OUD risk.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Having opioids co-prescribed with gabapentin or benzodiazepine was statistically significantly associated with a 37–45% increased OUD risk for the CP subgroup. Opioid dose and duration also were significantly associated with increased OUD risk in this subgroup. Physical therapy was significantly associated with an 18% <em>decreased</em> risk of OUD in the CP subgroup.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Coprescription of opioids with either gabapentin or benzodiazepines may substantially increase OUD risk. More positively, physical therapy may be a relatively accessible and safe pain management strategy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"volume\":\"67 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 878-886\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Preventive Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379724002484\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749379724002484","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:慢性疼痛患者滥用阿片类药物的风险增加。人们对每种疼痛治疗方法所带来的独特风险知之甚少,因为这些治疗方法通常是一起实施的,从而混淆了它们的独立效应。本研究估算了疼痛管理治疗与慢性疼痛患者阿片类药物使用障碍(OUD)风险的相关程度,同时控制了基线人口统计学变量和临床混杂变量,并将其他疼痛管理治疗保持在观察到的水平:分析了 2024 年来自 25 个州的 35-64 岁非怀孕医疗补助患者队列中两个慢性疼痛亚组的数据:1)慢性疼痛和身体残疾(CPPD)(N=6,133)或 2)无残疾慢性疼痛(CP)(N=67,438)。研究考虑了九种疼痛治疗方法:阿片类药物处方(i)剂量和(ii)持续时间;(iii)阿片类药物处方者的数量;阿片类药物与(iv)苯并地西泮类药物、(v)肌肉松弛剂和(vi)加巴喷丁类药物的联合处方;(vii)非阿片类药物止痛处方;(viii)物理治疗;以及(ix)其他疼痛治疗方式。研究结果为 OUD 风险:结果:在CP亚组中,阿片类药物与加巴喷丁或苯二氮卓类药物同时处方与OUD风险增加37%-45%有显著统计学关联。阿片类药物的剂量和持续时间也与该亚组的 OUD 风险增加有显著相关性。在 CP 亚组中,物理治疗与 OUD 风险降低 18% 明显相关:结论:阿片类药物与加巴喷丁或苯二氮卓类药物同时处方可能会大大增加 OUD 风险。更积极的是,物理治疗可能是一种相对容易获得且安全的疼痛管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pain Management Treatments and Opioid Use Disorder Risk in Medicaid Patients

Introduction

People with chronic pain are at increased risk of opioid misuse. Less is known about the unique risk conferred by each pain management treatment, as treatments are typically implemented together, confounding their independent effects. This study estimated the extent to which pain management treatments were associated with risk of opioid use disorder (OUD) for those with chronic pain, controlling for baseline demographic and clinical confounding variables and holding other pain management treatments at their observed levels.

Methods

Data were analyzed in 2024 from 2 chronic pain subgroups within a cohort of non-pregnant Medicaid patients aged 35–64 years, 2016–2019, from 25 states: those with (1) chronic pain and physical disability (CPPD) (N=6,133) or (2) chronic pain without disability (CP) (N=67,438). Nine pain management treatments were considered: prescription opioid (1) dose and (2) duration; (3) number of opioid prescribers; opioid co-prescription with (4) benzo- diazepines, (5) muscle relaxants, and (6) gabapentinoids; (7) nonopioid pain prescription, (8) physical therapy, and (9) other pain treatment modality. The outcome was OUD risk.

Results

Having opioids co-prescribed with gabapentin or benzodiazepine was statistically significantly associated with a 37–45% increased OUD risk for the CP subgroup. Opioid dose and duration also were significantly associated with increased OUD risk in this subgroup. Physical therapy was significantly associated with an 18% decreased risk of OUD in the CP subgroup.

Conclusions

Coprescription of opioids with either gabapentin or benzodiazepines may substantially increase OUD risk. More positively, physical therapy may be a relatively accessible and safe pain management strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.80%
发文量
395
审稿时长
32 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health. Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.
期刊最新文献
Masthead Evidence-Based Humanism: A Reflection from the APTR-AHRQ Preventive Medicine Residency Rotation Program Multimorbidity Trajectories from Early to Middle Adulthood and Physical Activity. New Family Planning Recommendations Centered on Advancing Equity for All. Providing Quality Family Planning Services in the United States: Recommendations of the U.S. Office of Population Affairs (Revised 2024).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1