新一代氟喹诺酮西他沙星有可能克服耐多药结核分枝杆菌对大多数左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星的耐药性。

Qing Sun, Kai Cheng, Xinlei Liao, Weijie Zhao, Chenqian Wang, Chaohong Wang, Jun Yan, Lingling Dong, Fen Wang, Guanglu Jiang, Hairong Huang, Zhenyong Guo, Guirong Wang
{"title":"新一代氟喹诺酮西他沙星有可能克服耐多药结核分枝杆菌对大多数左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星的耐药性。","authors":"Qing Sun, Kai Cheng, Xinlei Liao, Weijie Zhao, Chenqian Wang, Chaohong Wang, Jun Yan, Lingling Dong, Fen Wang, Guanglu Jiang, Hairong Huang, Zhenyong Guo, Guirong Wang","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Pre-existing fluoroquinolones (FQs) resistance is a major threat in treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis. Sitafloxacin (Sfx) is a new broad-spectrum FQ.<b>Hypothesis.</b> Sfx is more active against drug-resistant <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> (Mtb) isolates.<b>Aim.</b> To determine whether there is cross-resistance between Sfx and ofloxacin (Ofx), levofloxacin (Lfx) and moxifloxacin (Mfx) in MDR Mtb.<b>Methods.</b> A total of 106 clinical Mtb isolates, including 23 pan-susceptible and 83 MDR strains, were analysed for Sfx, Lfx and Mfx resistance using MIC assay. The isolates were also subjected to whole-genome sequencing to analyse drug-resistant genes.<b>Results.</b> Sfx exhibited the most robust inhibition activity against Mtb clinical isolates, with a MIC<sub>50</sub> of 0.0313 µg ml<sup>-1</sup> and MIC<sub>90</sub> of 0.125 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>, which was lower than that of Mfx (MIC<sub>50</sub> = 0.0625 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>, MIC<sub>90</sub> = 1 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>) and Lfx (MIC<sub>50</sub> = 0.125 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>, MIC<sub>90</sub> = 2 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>). We determined the tentative epidemiological cut-off values as 0.5 µg ml<sup>-1</sup> for Sfx. Also, 8.43% (7/83), 43.37% (36/83), 42.17% (35/83) and 51.81% (43/83) MDR strains were resistant to Sfx, Mfx, Lfx and Ofx, respectively. Cross-resistance between Ofx, Lfx and Mfx was 80.43% (37/46). Only 15.22% (7/46) of the pre-existing FQs resistance isolates were resistant to Sfx. Among the 30 isolates with mutations in <i>gyrA</i> or <i>gyrB</i>, 5 (16.67%) were Sfx resistant. The combination of Sfx and rifampicin could exert partial synergistic effects, and no antagonism between Sfx and six clinically important anti-Mtb antibiotics was evident.<b>Conclusion.</b> Sfx exhibited superior activity against MDR isolates comparing to Lfx and Mfx, and could potentially overcome the majority pre-existing FQs resistance in Mtb strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"73 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New generation fluoroquinolone sitafloxacin could potentially overcome the majority levofloxacin and moxifloxacin resistance in multidrug-resistant <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Qing Sun, Kai Cheng, Xinlei Liao, Weijie Zhao, Chenqian Wang, Chaohong Wang, Jun Yan, Lingling Dong, Fen Wang, Guanglu Jiang, Hairong Huang, Zhenyong Guo, Guirong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1099/jmm.0.001825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Pre-existing fluoroquinolones (FQs) resistance is a major threat in treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis. Sitafloxacin (Sfx) is a new broad-spectrum FQ.<b>Hypothesis.</b> Sfx is more active against drug-resistant <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> (Mtb) isolates.<b>Aim.</b> To determine whether there is cross-resistance between Sfx and ofloxacin (Ofx), levofloxacin (Lfx) and moxifloxacin (Mfx) in MDR Mtb.<b>Methods.</b> A total of 106 clinical Mtb isolates, including 23 pan-susceptible and 83 MDR strains, were analysed for Sfx, Lfx and Mfx resistance using MIC assay. The isolates were also subjected to whole-genome sequencing to analyse drug-resistant genes.<b>Results.</b> Sfx exhibited the most robust inhibition activity against Mtb clinical isolates, with a MIC<sub>50</sub> of 0.0313 µg ml<sup>-1</sup> and MIC<sub>90</sub> of 0.125 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>, which was lower than that of Mfx (MIC<sub>50</sub> = 0.0625 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>, MIC<sub>90</sub> = 1 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>) and Lfx (MIC<sub>50</sub> = 0.125 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>, MIC<sub>90</sub> = 2 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>). We determined the tentative epidemiological cut-off values as 0.5 µg ml<sup>-1</sup> for Sfx. Also, 8.43% (7/83), 43.37% (36/83), 42.17% (35/83) and 51.81% (43/83) MDR strains were resistant to Sfx, Mfx, Lfx and Ofx, respectively. Cross-resistance between Ofx, Lfx and Mfx was 80.43% (37/46). Only 15.22% (7/46) of the pre-existing FQs resistance isolates were resistant to Sfx. Among the 30 isolates with mutations in <i>gyrA</i> or <i>gyrB</i>, 5 (16.67%) were Sfx resistant. The combination of Sfx and rifampicin could exert partial synergistic effects, and no antagonism between Sfx and six clinically important anti-Mtb antibiotics was evident.<b>Conclusion.</b> Sfx exhibited superior activity against MDR isolates comparing to Lfx and Mfx, and could potentially overcome the majority pre-existing FQs resistance in Mtb strains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"volume\":\"73 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001825\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言。已有的氟喹诺酮类药物(FQs)耐药性是治疗耐多药(MDR)结核病的主要威胁。西他沙星(Sfx)是一种新型广谱氟喹诺酮类药物。Sfx对耐药结核分枝杆菌(Mtb)分离株更有效。确定Sfx与氧氟沙星(Ofx)、左氧氟沙星(Lfx)和莫西沙星(Mfx)在MDR Mtb中是否存在交叉耐药性。采用 MIC 法分析了 106 株临床 Mtb 分离株,包括 23 株泛敏感株和 83 株 MDR 株,以确定它们对 Sfx、Lfx 和 Mfx 的耐药性。还对分离株进行了全基因组测序,以分析耐药基因。Sfx对Mtb临床分离株的抑制活性最强,MIC50为0.0313 µg ml-1,MIC90为0.125 µg ml-1,低于Mfx(MIC50 = 0.0625 µg ml-1,MIC90 = 1 µg ml-1)和Lfx(MIC50 = 0.125 µg ml-1,MIC90 = 2 µg ml-1)。我们暂定 Sfx 的流行病学临界值为 0.5 µg ml-1。此外,分别有8.43%(7/83)、43.37%(36/83)、42.17%(35/83)和51.81%(43/83)的MDR菌株对Sfx、Mfx、Lfx和Ofx耐药。Ofx、Lfx和Mfx之间的交叉耐药性占80.43%(37/46)。只有15.22%(7/46)已对FQs产生抗药性的分离物对Sfx产生抗药性。在gyrA或gyrB发生突变的30个分离株中,有5个(16.67%)对Sfx产生抗药性。Sfx与利福平联用可发挥部分协同作用,Sfx与六种临床上重要的抗Mtb抗生素之间没有明显的拮抗作用。结论:与Lfx和Mfx相比,Sfx对MDR分离株表现出更强的活性,并有可能克服Mtb菌株对FQs的耐药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New generation fluoroquinolone sitafloxacin could potentially overcome the majority levofloxacin and moxifloxacin resistance in multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Introduction. Pre-existing fluoroquinolones (FQs) resistance is a major threat in treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis. Sitafloxacin (Sfx) is a new broad-spectrum FQ.Hypothesis. Sfx is more active against drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) isolates.Aim. To determine whether there is cross-resistance between Sfx and ofloxacin (Ofx), levofloxacin (Lfx) and moxifloxacin (Mfx) in MDR Mtb.Methods. A total of 106 clinical Mtb isolates, including 23 pan-susceptible and 83 MDR strains, were analysed for Sfx, Lfx and Mfx resistance using MIC assay. The isolates were also subjected to whole-genome sequencing to analyse drug-resistant genes.Results. Sfx exhibited the most robust inhibition activity against Mtb clinical isolates, with a MIC50 of 0.0313 µg ml-1 and MIC90 of 0.125 µg ml-1, which was lower than that of Mfx (MIC50 = 0.0625 µg ml-1, MIC90 = 1 µg ml-1) and Lfx (MIC50 = 0.125 µg ml-1, MIC90 = 2 µg ml-1). We determined the tentative epidemiological cut-off values as 0.5 µg ml-1 for Sfx. Also, 8.43% (7/83), 43.37% (36/83), 42.17% (35/83) and 51.81% (43/83) MDR strains were resistant to Sfx, Mfx, Lfx and Ofx, respectively. Cross-resistance between Ofx, Lfx and Mfx was 80.43% (37/46). Only 15.22% (7/46) of the pre-existing FQs resistance isolates were resistant to Sfx. Among the 30 isolates with mutations in gyrA or gyrB, 5 (16.67%) were Sfx resistant. The combination of Sfx and rifampicin could exert partial synergistic effects, and no antagonism between Sfx and six clinically important anti-Mtb antibiotics was evident.Conclusion. Sfx exhibited superior activity against MDR isolates comparing to Lfx and Mfx, and could potentially overcome the majority pre-existing FQs resistance in Mtb strains.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antifungal resistance, clinical outcome and clinico-microbiological correlation in ocular infections due to common melanized fungi Curvularia lunata and Lasiodiplodia theobromae in South India. Genotypic analysis of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli clonal complex 17 in England and Wales, 2014-2022. Nanomotion technology: an innovative method to study cell metabolism in Escherichia coli, as a potential indicator for tolerance. Association of gut microbiota with allograft injury in kidney transplant recipients: a comparative profiling through 16S metagenomics and quantitative PCR. Chronic Strongyloides stercoralis infection in Fijian migrants to the UK.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1