Qing Sun, Kai Cheng, Xinlei Liao, Weijie Zhao, Chenqian Wang, Chaohong Wang, Jun Yan, Lingling Dong, Fen Wang, Guanglu Jiang, Hairong Huang, Zhenyong Guo, Guirong Wang
{"title":"新一代氟喹诺酮西他沙星有可能克服耐多药结核分枝杆菌对大多数左氧氟沙星和莫西沙星的耐药性。","authors":"Qing Sun, Kai Cheng, Xinlei Liao, Weijie Zhao, Chenqian Wang, Chaohong Wang, Jun Yan, Lingling Dong, Fen Wang, Guanglu Jiang, Hairong Huang, Zhenyong Guo, Guirong Wang","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Pre-existing fluoroquinolones (FQs) resistance is a major threat in treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis. Sitafloxacin (Sfx) is a new broad-spectrum FQ.<b>Hypothesis.</b> Sfx is more active against drug-resistant <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> (Mtb) isolates.<b>Aim.</b> To determine whether there is cross-resistance between Sfx and ofloxacin (Ofx), levofloxacin (Lfx) and moxifloxacin (Mfx) in MDR Mtb.<b>Methods.</b> A total of 106 clinical Mtb isolates, including 23 pan-susceptible and 83 MDR strains, were analysed for Sfx, Lfx and Mfx resistance using MIC assay. The isolates were also subjected to whole-genome sequencing to analyse drug-resistant genes.<b>Results.</b> Sfx exhibited the most robust inhibition activity against Mtb clinical isolates, with a MIC<sub>50</sub> of 0.0313 µg ml<sup>-1</sup> and MIC<sub>90</sub> of 0.125 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>, which was lower than that of Mfx (MIC<sub>50</sub> = 0.0625 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>, MIC<sub>90</sub> = 1 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>) and Lfx (MIC<sub>50</sub> = 0.125 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>, MIC<sub>90</sub> = 2 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>). We determined the tentative epidemiological cut-off values as 0.5 µg ml<sup>-1</sup> for Sfx. Also, 8.43% (7/83), 43.37% (36/83), 42.17% (35/83) and 51.81% (43/83) MDR strains were resistant to Sfx, Mfx, Lfx and Ofx, respectively. Cross-resistance between Ofx, Lfx and Mfx was 80.43% (37/46). Only 15.22% (7/46) of the pre-existing FQs resistance isolates were resistant to Sfx. Among the 30 isolates with mutations in <i>gyrA</i> or <i>gyrB</i>, 5 (16.67%) were Sfx resistant. The combination of Sfx and rifampicin could exert partial synergistic effects, and no antagonism between Sfx and six clinically important anti-Mtb antibiotics was evident.<b>Conclusion.</b> Sfx exhibited superior activity against MDR isolates comparing to Lfx and Mfx, and could potentially overcome the majority pre-existing FQs resistance in Mtb strains.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"73 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New generation fluoroquinolone sitafloxacin could potentially overcome the majority levofloxacin and moxifloxacin resistance in multidrug-resistant <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Qing Sun, Kai Cheng, Xinlei Liao, Weijie Zhao, Chenqian Wang, Chaohong Wang, Jun Yan, Lingling Dong, Fen Wang, Guanglu Jiang, Hairong Huang, Zhenyong Guo, Guirong Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1099/jmm.0.001825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Pre-existing fluoroquinolones (FQs) resistance is a major threat in treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis. Sitafloxacin (Sfx) is a new broad-spectrum FQ.<b>Hypothesis.</b> Sfx is more active against drug-resistant <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> (Mtb) isolates.<b>Aim.</b> To determine whether there is cross-resistance between Sfx and ofloxacin (Ofx), levofloxacin (Lfx) and moxifloxacin (Mfx) in MDR Mtb.<b>Methods.</b> A total of 106 clinical Mtb isolates, including 23 pan-susceptible and 83 MDR strains, were analysed for Sfx, Lfx and Mfx resistance using MIC assay. The isolates were also subjected to whole-genome sequencing to analyse drug-resistant genes.<b>Results.</b> Sfx exhibited the most robust inhibition activity against Mtb clinical isolates, with a MIC<sub>50</sub> of 0.0313 µg ml<sup>-1</sup> and MIC<sub>90</sub> of 0.125 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>, which was lower than that of Mfx (MIC<sub>50</sub> = 0.0625 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>, MIC<sub>90</sub> = 1 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>) and Lfx (MIC<sub>50</sub> = 0.125 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>, MIC<sub>90</sub> = 2 µg ml<sup>-1</sup>). We determined the tentative epidemiological cut-off values as 0.5 µg ml<sup>-1</sup> for Sfx. Also, 8.43% (7/83), 43.37% (36/83), 42.17% (35/83) and 51.81% (43/83) MDR strains were resistant to Sfx, Mfx, Lfx and Ofx, respectively. Cross-resistance between Ofx, Lfx and Mfx was 80.43% (37/46). Only 15.22% (7/46) of the pre-existing FQs resistance isolates were resistant to Sfx. Among the 30 isolates with mutations in <i>gyrA</i> or <i>gyrB</i>, 5 (16.67%) were Sfx resistant. The combination of Sfx and rifampicin could exert partial synergistic effects, and no antagonism between Sfx and six clinically important anti-Mtb antibiotics was evident.<b>Conclusion.</b> Sfx exhibited superior activity against MDR isolates comparing to Lfx and Mfx, and could potentially overcome the majority pre-existing FQs resistance in Mtb strains.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"volume\":\"73 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001825\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
New generation fluoroquinolone sitafloxacin could potentially overcome the majority levofloxacin and moxifloxacin resistance in multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Introduction. Pre-existing fluoroquinolones (FQs) resistance is a major threat in treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis. Sitafloxacin (Sfx) is a new broad-spectrum FQ.Hypothesis. Sfx is more active against drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) isolates.Aim. To determine whether there is cross-resistance between Sfx and ofloxacin (Ofx), levofloxacin (Lfx) and moxifloxacin (Mfx) in MDR Mtb.Methods. A total of 106 clinical Mtb isolates, including 23 pan-susceptible and 83 MDR strains, were analysed for Sfx, Lfx and Mfx resistance using MIC assay. The isolates were also subjected to whole-genome sequencing to analyse drug-resistant genes.Results. Sfx exhibited the most robust inhibition activity against Mtb clinical isolates, with a MIC50 of 0.0313 µg ml-1 and MIC90 of 0.125 µg ml-1, which was lower than that of Mfx (MIC50 = 0.0625 µg ml-1, MIC90 = 1 µg ml-1) and Lfx (MIC50 = 0.125 µg ml-1, MIC90 = 2 µg ml-1). We determined the tentative epidemiological cut-off values as 0.5 µg ml-1 for Sfx. Also, 8.43% (7/83), 43.37% (36/83), 42.17% (35/83) and 51.81% (43/83) MDR strains were resistant to Sfx, Mfx, Lfx and Ofx, respectively. Cross-resistance between Ofx, Lfx and Mfx was 80.43% (37/46). Only 15.22% (7/46) of the pre-existing FQs resistance isolates were resistant to Sfx. Among the 30 isolates with mutations in gyrA or gyrB, 5 (16.67%) were Sfx resistant. The combination of Sfx and rifampicin could exert partial synergistic effects, and no antagonism between Sfx and six clinically important anti-Mtb antibiotics was evident.Conclusion. Sfx exhibited superior activity against MDR isolates comparing to Lfx and Mfx, and could potentially overcome the majority pre-existing FQs resistance in Mtb strains.