糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中的耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌感染及可能的有效联合疗法

IF 3.4 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1186/s43094-024-00661-x
Aya M. Ghareeb, Marwa M. Raafat, Naglaa S. Bazan, Reham Samir
{"title":"糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中的耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌感染及可能的有效联合疗法","authors":"Aya M. Ghareeb,&nbsp;Marwa M. Raafat,&nbsp;Naglaa S. Bazan,&nbsp;Reham Samir","doi":"10.1186/s43094-024-00661-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Carbapenems are one of the most noteworthy choices for treating multidrug-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii)</i>. Currently, carbapenem-resistant <i>A. baumannii</i> (CRAB) represents a healthcare problem worldwide, particularly among diabetic patients who are more susceptible to microbial infections. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in antibiotic susceptibility profiles, the abundance of carbapenem resistance genes across <i>A. baumannii-</i>infected diabetic and non-diabetic patients, and the antimicrobial activity of different antibiotic combinations on highly resistant isolates.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data of 99 <i>A. baumannii</i>-infected patients were collected during the period from 2018 to 2022 and categorized according to patients’ diabetes status into either diabetic or non-diabetic group. A total of 45 <i>A. baumannii</i> isolates were collected during 2021 and 2022 from the main hospital laboratory to be reidentified and genetically confirmed. Antibiotic susceptibility, including carbapenems, was determined using disc agar diffusion and broth microdilution methods. The isolates were screened for <i>OXA-23, GES, VIM, and NDM</i> carbapenem-resistant genes. Five antibiotic combinations were assessed using the double-disk synergy and checkerboard methods.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The findings of the current study revealed that multidrug resistance increased gradually, from 56% in 2018 to 95.6% in 2022. Moreover, CRAB increased among diabetics and non-diabetics. Resistance rates of imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem reached 68.8%, 61.8%, and 47.4% in diabetics and 97.9%, 83.3%, and 50% in non-diabetics, respectively. The <i>VIM</i> gene was the most prevalent gene with prevalence rates of 100% and 96.15% in diabetics and non-diabetics, respectively. Moreover, all <i>A. baumannii</i> isolates carried at least two of the selected carbapenem-resistant genes. Across the different used combinations, only the tigecycline-meropenem combination showed synergistic activity in 50% of diabetic and 66.7% of non-diabetic isolates.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>An increased carbapenem resistance was observed among <i>A. baumannii</i>-infected individuals, both diabetic and non-diabetic. The MEM/TCG combination was the only one that showed synergistic or additive effects against highly resistant isolates making it a viable alternative treatment option.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":577,"journal":{"name":"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://fjps.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s43094-024-00661-x","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections among diabetic and non-diabetic patients and possible effective combination treatments\",\"authors\":\"Aya M. Ghareeb,&nbsp;Marwa M. Raafat,&nbsp;Naglaa S. Bazan,&nbsp;Reham Samir\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43094-024-00661-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Carbapenems are one of the most noteworthy choices for treating multidrug-resistant <i>Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii)</i>. Currently, carbapenem-resistant <i>A. baumannii</i> (CRAB) represents a healthcare problem worldwide, particularly among diabetic patients who are more susceptible to microbial infections. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in antibiotic susceptibility profiles, the abundance of carbapenem resistance genes across <i>A. baumannii-</i>infected diabetic and non-diabetic patients, and the antimicrobial activity of different antibiotic combinations on highly resistant isolates.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data of 99 <i>A. baumannii</i>-infected patients were collected during the period from 2018 to 2022 and categorized according to patients’ diabetes status into either diabetic or non-diabetic group. A total of 45 <i>A. baumannii</i> isolates were collected during 2021 and 2022 from the main hospital laboratory to be reidentified and genetically confirmed. Antibiotic susceptibility, including carbapenems, was determined using disc agar diffusion and broth microdilution methods. The isolates were screened for <i>OXA-23, GES, VIM, and NDM</i> carbapenem-resistant genes. Five antibiotic combinations were assessed using the double-disk synergy and checkerboard methods.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The findings of the current study revealed that multidrug resistance increased gradually, from 56% in 2018 to 95.6% in 2022. Moreover, CRAB increased among diabetics and non-diabetics. Resistance rates of imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem reached 68.8%, 61.8%, and 47.4% in diabetics and 97.9%, 83.3%, and 50% in non-diabetics, respectively. The <i>VIM</i> gene was the most prevalent gene with prevalence rates of 100% and 96.15% in diabetics and non-diabetics, respectively. Moreover, all <i>A. baumannii</i> isolates carried at least two of the selected carbapenem-resistant genes. Across the different used combinations, only the tigecycline-meropenem combination showed synergistic activity in 50% of diabetic and 66.7% of non-diabetic isolates.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>An increased carbapenem resistance was observed among <i>A. baumannii</i>-infected individuals, both diabetic and non-diabetic. The MEM/TCG combination was the only one that showed synergistic or additive effects against highly resistant isolates making it a viable alternative treatment option.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://fjps.springeropen.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s43094-024-00661-x\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43094-024-00661-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s43094-024-00661-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景碳青霉烯类是治疗耐多药鲍曼不动杆菌(A. baumannii)最值得关注的选择之一。目前,耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌(CRAB)是全球范围内的一个医疗保健问题,尤其是在糖尿病患者中,他们更容易受到微生物感染。本研究旨在调查感染鲍曼尼氏菌的糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者对抗生素敏感性的差异、碳青霉烯类耐药基因的丰度,以及不同抗生素组合对高耐药分离株的抗菌活性。方法在2018年至2022年期间收集了99名感染鲍曼尼氏菌患者的数据,并根据患者的糖尿病状态分为糖尿病组和非糖尿病组。2021 年和 2022 年期间,从医院主实验室共收集了 45 份鲍曼尼氏菌分离物,对其进行重新鉴定和基因确认。采用圆盘琼脂扩散法和肉汤微量稀释法测定抗生素敏感性,包括碳青霉烯类抗生素。对分离物进行了 OXA-23、GES、VIM 和 NDM 碳青霉烯类耐药基因筛查。采用双盘协同法和棋盘格法对五种抗生素组合进行了评估。结果本次研究结果显示,多重耐药性逐渐增加,从 2018 年的 56% 增加到 2022 年的 95.6%。此外,糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者的CRAB均有所增加。糖尿病患者对亚胺培南、美罗培南和多瑞培南的耐药率分别达到68.8%、61.8%和47.4%,非糖尿病患者分别达到97.9%、83.3%和50%。VIM 基因是最常见的基因,在糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者中的流行率分别为 100%和 96.15%。此外,所有鲍曼尼氏菌分离物至少携带两种所选的碳青霉烯耐药基因。在不同的组合中,只有替加环素-美罗培南组合在50%的糖尿病患者和66.7%的非糖尿病患者分离物中显示出协同活性。MEM/TCG 组合是唯一一种对高耐药性分离物显示出协同或相加效应的组合,使其成为一种可行的替代治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections among diabetic and non-diabetic patients and possible effective combination treatments

Background

Carbapenems are one of the most noteworthy choices for treating multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii). Currently, carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (CRAB) represents a healthcare problem worldwide, particularly among diabetic patients who are more susceptible to microbial infections. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in antibiotic susceptibility profiles, the abundance of carbapenem resistance genes across A. baumannii-infected diabetic and non-diabetic patients, and the antimicrobial activity of different antibiotic combinations on highly resistant isolates.

Methods

Data of 99 A. baumannii-infected patients were collected during the period from 2018 to 2022 and categorized according to patients’ diabetes status into either diabetic or non-diabetic group. A total of 45 A. baumannii isolates were collected during 2021 and 2022 from the main hospital laboratory to be reidentified and genetically confirmed. Antibiotic susceptibility, including carbapenems, was determined using disc agar diffusion and broth microdilution methods. The isolates were screened for OXA-23, GES, VIM, and NDM carbapenem-resistant genes. Five antibiotic combinations were assessed using the double-disk synergy and checkerboard methods.

Results

The findings of the current study revealed that multidrug resistance increased gradually, from 56% in 2018 to 95.6% in 2022. Moreover, CRAB increased among diabetics and non-diabetics. Resistance rates of imipenem, meropenem, and doripenem reached 68.8%, 61.8%, and 47.4% in diabetics and 97.9%, 83.3%, and 50% in non-diabetics, respectively. The VIM gene was the most prevalent gene with prevalence rates of 100% and 96.15% in diabetics and non-diabetics, respectively. Moreover, all A. baumannii isolates carried at least two of the selected carbapenem-resistant genes. Across the different used combinations, only the tigecycline-meropenem combination showed synergistic activity in 50% of diabetic and 66.7% of non-diabetic isolates.

Conclusions

An increased carbapenem resistance was observed among A. baumannii-infected individuals, both diabetic and non-diabetic. The MEM/TCG combination was the only one that showed synergistic or additive effects against highly resistant isolates making it a viable alternative treatment option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (FJPS) is the official journal of the Future University in Egypt. It is a peer-reviewed, open access journal which publishes original research articles, review articles and case studies on all aspects of pharmaceutical sciences and technologies, pharmacy practice and related clinical aspects, and pharmacy education. The journal publishes articles covering developments in drug absorption and metabolism, pharmacokinetics and dynamics, drug delivery systems, drug targeting and nano-technology. It also covers development of new systems, methods and techniques in pharmacy education and practice. The scope of the journal also extends to cover advancements in toxicology, cell and molecular biology, biomedical research, clinical and pharmaceutical microbiology, pharmaceutical biotechnology, medicinal chemistry, phytochemistry and nutraceuticals.
期刊最新文献
Nanocochleate-based delivery of quercetin with enhanced therapeutic potential: formulation, cytotoxicity and pharmacokinetics study Computational and experimental insights into glycyrrhizin-loaded nanostructured lipid carriers: docking, dynamics, design optimization, and anticancer efficacy in lung cancer cells Multifunctional approach with LHRH-mediated PLGA nanoconjugate for site-specific codelivery of curcumin and BCL2 siRNA in mice lung cancer Lignin-chitosan-based biocomposite film for the localized delivery of TLR7 agonist imiquimod Development, characterization, and assessment of PLAROsomal vesicular system of curcumin for enhanced stability and therapeutic efficacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1