像病理学家一样思考:通过 ChatGPT 学习肝胆肿瘤的形态学方法。

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqae087
Thiyaphat Laohawetwanit, Sompon Apornvirat, Chutimon Namboonlue
{"title":"像病理学家一样思考:通过 ChatGPT 学习肝胆肿瘤的形态学方法。","authors":"Thiyaphat Laohawetwanit, Sompon Apornvirat, Chutimon Namboonlue","doi":"10.1093/ajcp/aqae087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ChatGPT in accurately diagnosing hepatobiliary tumors using histopathologic images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study compared the diagnostic accuracies of the GPT-4 model, providing the same set of images and 2 different input prompts. The first prompt, the morphologic approach, was designed to mimic pathologists' approach to analyzing tissue morphology. In contrast, the second prompt functioned without incorporating this morphologic analysis feature. Diagnostic accuracy and consistency were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 photomicrographs, composed of 60 images of each hepatobiliary tumor and nonneoplastic liver tissue, were used. The findings revealed that the morphologic approach significantly enhanced the diagnostic accuracy and consistency of the artificial intelligence (AI). This version was particularly more accurate in identifying hepatocellular carcinoma (mean accuracy: 62.0% vs 27.3%), bile duct adenoma (10.7% vs 3.3%), and cholangiocarcinoma (68.7% vs 16.0%), as well as in distinguishing nonneoplastic liver tissues (77.3% vs 37.5%) (Ps ≤ .01). It also demonstrated higher diagnostic consistency than the other model without a morphologic analysis (κ: 0.46 vs 0.27).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research emphasizes the importance of incorporating pathologists' diagnostic approaches into AI to enhance accuracy and consistency in medical diagnostics. It mainly showcases the AI's histopathologic promise when replicating expert diagnostic processes.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thinking like a pathologist: Morphologic approach to hepatobiliary tumors by ChatGPT.\",\"authors\":\"Thiyaphat Laohawetwanit, Sompon Apornvirat, Chutimon Namboonlue\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajcp/aqae087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ChatGPT in accurately diagnosing hepatobiliary tumors using histopathologic images.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study compared the diagnostic accuracies of the GPT-4 model, providing the same set of images and 2 different input prompts. The first prompt, the morphologic approach, was designed to mimic pathologists' approach to analyzing tissue morphology. In contrast, the second prompt functioned without incorporating this morphologic analysis feature. Diagnostic accuracy and consistency were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 120 photomicrographs, composed of 60 images of each hepatobiliary tumor and nonneoplastic liver tissue, were used. The findings revealed that the morphologic approach significantly enhanced the diagnostic accuracy and consistency of the artificial intelligence (AI). This version was particularly more accurate in identifying hepatocellular carcinoma (mean accuracy: 62.0% vs 27.3%), bile duct adenoma (10.7% vs 3.3%), and cholangiocarcinoma (68.7% vs 16.0%), as well as in distinguishing nonneoplastic liver tissues (77.3% vs 37.5%) (Ps ≤ .01). It also demonstrated higher diagnostic consistency than the other model without a morphologic analysis (κ: 0.46 vs 0.27).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research emphasizes the importance of incorporating pathologists' diagnostic approaches into AI to enhance accuracy and consistency in medical diagnostics. It mainly showcases the AI's histopathologic promise when replicating expert diagnostic processes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqae087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqae087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在评估 ChatGPT 使用组织病理学图像准确诊断肝胆肿瘤的效果:研究比较了 GPT-4 模型的诊断准确性,提供了同一组图像和两种不同的输入提示。第一个提示是形态学方法,旨在模仿病理学家分析组织形态的方法。与此相反,第二个提示的功能并不包含形态分析功能。对诊断准确性和一致性进行了分析:共使用了 120 张显微照片,包括肝胆肿瘤和非肿瘤性肝组织各 60 张图像。研究结果表明,形态学方法显著提高了人工智能(AI)的诊断准确性和一致性。该版本在识别肝细胞癌(平均准确率:62.0% 对 27.3%)、胆管腺瘤(10.7% 对 3.3%)和胆管癌(68.7% 对 16.0%)以及区分非肿瘤性肝组织(77.3% 对 37.5%)方面尤其准确(Ps ≤ .01)。此外,该模型的诊断一致性也高于未进行形态学分析的其他模型(κ:0.46 vs 0.27):这项研究强调了将病理学家的诊断方法纳入人工智能以提高医疗诊断准确性和一致性的重要性。它主要展示了人工智能在复制专家诊断过程时的组织病理学前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Thinking like a pathologist: Morphologic approach to hepatobiliary tumors by ChatGPT.

Objectives: This research aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ChatGPT in accurately diagnosing hepatobiliary tumors using histopathologic images.

Methods: The study compared the diagnostic accuracies of the GPT-4 model, providing the same set of images and 2 different input prompts. The first prompt, the morphologic approach, was designed to mimic pathologists' approach to analyzing tissue morphology. In contrast, the second prompt functioned without incorporating this morphologic analysis feature. Diagnostic accuracy and consistency were analyzed.

Results: A total of 120 photomicrographs, composed of 60 images of each hepatobiliary tumor and nonneoplastic liver tissue, were used. The findings revealed that the morphologic approach significantly enhanced the diagnostic accuracy and consistency of the artificial intelligence (AI). This version was particularly more accurate in identifying hepatocellular carcinoma (mean accuracy: 62.0% vs 27.3%), bile duct adenoma (10.7% vs 3.3%), and cholangiocarcinoma (68.7% vs 16.0%), as well as in distinguishing nonneoplastic liver tissues (77.3% vs 37.5%) (Ps ≤ .01). It also demonstrated higher diagnostic consistency than the other model without a morphologic analysis (κ: 0.46 vs 0.27).

Conclusions: This research emphasizes the importance of incorporating pathologists' diagnostic approaches into AI to enhance accuracy and consistency in medical diagnostics. It mainly showcases the AI's histopathologic promise when replicating expert diagnostic processes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1