去氨加压素刺激试验在 ACTH 依赖性库欣综合征综合评估中的诊断准确性:与 BIPSS 和 TSS 的比较分析。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Endocrine Research Pub Date : 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1080/07435800.2024.2381720
Majid Valizadeh, Fatemeh Rahmani, Mohammad Nikoohemmat, Amirhossein Ramezani Ahmadi, Farhad Hosseinpanah, Mahtab Niroomand, Arash Khameneh Bagheri, Ashley Grossman, Behnaz Abiri
{"title":"去氨加压素刺激试验在 ACTH 依赖性库欣综合征综合评估中的诊断准确性:与 BIPSS 和 TSS 的比较分析。","authors":"Majid Valizadeh, Fatemeh Rahmani, Mohammad Nikoohemmat, Amirhossein Ramezani Ahmadi, Farhad Hosseinpanah, Mahtab Niroomand, Arash Khameneh Bagheri, Ashley Grossman, Behnaz Abiri","doi":"10.1080/07435800.2024.2381720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cushing's syndrome (CS) poses diagnostic challenges, particularly in distinguishing pituitary-dependent Cushing's syndrome, Cushing's disease (CD), from the ectopic ACTH syndrome (EAS). This study evaluated the diagnostic value of the desmopressin stimulation test (DST) in patients with ACTH-dependent CS in helping this discrimination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three ACTH-dependent CS patients underwent sequential DST, bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS), and transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). Two definitions of a positive DST results were applied. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios. To avoid bias from predetermined criteria, we generated univariate receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, plotting sensitivity against 1-specificity at various percentage cortisol and ACTH response levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Against BIPSS, DST demonstrated robust sensitivity (Definition 1: 90.0%, Definition 2: 76.2%) and overall accuracy (Definition 1: 87.0%, Definition 2: 73.9%). PPV was high (Definition 1: 95.0%, Definition 2: 94.1%), but NPV indicated potential false negatives. Compared to TSS, DST showed good sensitivity (Definition 1: 90.9-77.3%) and PPV (100.0%) but limited NPV (16.7%). The likelihood ratios emphasized the diagnostic value of the test. Notably, against TSS, DST showed perfect discriminatory power (AUC 1.000 for percent ACTH, 0.983 for percent cortisol).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The desmopressin test shows promise in accurately identifying the underlying cause of ACTH-dependent CS, potentially reducing the reliance on invasive procedures and providing a practical solution for managing complex cases. Further research with larger cohorts is required to validate the utility of the DST in routine clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11601,"journal":{"name":"Endocrine Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of the Desmopressin Stimulation Test in the Comprehensive Assessment of ACTH-Dependent Cushing's Syndrome: A Comparative Analysis with BIPSS and TSS.\",\"authors\":\"Majid Valizadeh, Fatemeh Rahmani, Mohammad Nikoohemmat, Amirhossein Ramezani Ahmadi, Farhad Hosseinpanah, Mahtab Niroomand, Arash Khameneh Bagheri, Ashley Grossman, Behnaz Abiri\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07435800.2024.2381720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cushing's syndrome (CS) poses diagnostic challenges, particularly in distinguishing pituitary-dependent Cushing's syndrome, Cushing's disease (CD), from the ectopic ACTH syndrome (EAS). This study evaluated the diagnostic value of the desmopressin stimulation test (DST) in patients with ACTH-dependent CS in helping this discrimination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three ACTH-dependent CS patients underwent sequential DST, bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS), and transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). Two definitions of a positive DST results were applied. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios. To avoid bias from predetermined criteria, we generated univariate receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, plotting sensitivity against 1-specificity at various percentage cortisol and ACTH response levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Against BIPSS, DST demonstrated robust sensitivity (Definition 1: 90.0%, Definition 2: 76.2%) and overall accuracy (Definition 1: 87.0%, Definition 2: 73.9%). PPV was high (Definition 1: 95.0%, Definition 2: 94.1%), but NPV indicated potential false negatives. Compared to TSS, DST showed good sensitivity (Definition 1: 90.9-77.3%) and PPV (100.0%) but limited NPV (16.7%). The likelihood ratios emphasized the diagnostic value of the test. Notably, against TSS, DST showed perfect discriminatory power (AUC 1.000 for percent ACTH, 0.983 for percent cortisol).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The desmopressin test shows promise in accurately identifying the underlying cause of ACTH-dependent CS, potentially reducing the reliance on invasive procedures and providing a practical solution for managing complex cases. Further research with larger cohorts is required to validate the utility of the DST in routine clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11601,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Endocrine Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Endocrine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07435800.2024.2381720\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Endocrine Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07435800.2024.2381720","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:库欣综合征(CS)给诊断带来了挑战,尤其是在区分垂体依赖性库欣综合征、库欣病(CD)和异位ACTH综合征(EAS)方面。本研究评估了去氨加压素刺激试验(DST)在ACTH依赖型库欣综合征患者中的诊断价值,以帮助进行鉴别:23名ACTH依赖型CS患者依次接受了DST、双侧下蝶窦取样(BIPSS)和经蝶窦手术(TSS)。DST 阳性结果有两种定义。诊断效果采用敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)和似然比进行评估。为避免预先确定的标准产生偏差,我们绘制了单变量受体运算特征曲线(ROC),将不同皮质醇和促肾上腺皮质激素反应水平百分比下的灵敏度与特异性对比:与 BIPSS 相比,DST 具有很高的灵敏度(定义 1:90.0%,定义 2:76.2%)和总体准确性(定义 1:87.0%,定义 2:73.9%)。PPV 很高(定义 1:95.0%,定义 2:94.1%),但 NPV 表明可能存在假阴性。与 TSS 相比,DST 显示出良好的灵敏度(定义 1:90.9%-77.3%)和 PPV(100.0%),但 NPV 有限(16.7%)。似然比强调了该检测的诊断价值。值得注意的是,与 TSS 相比,DST 显示出完美的鉴别力(ACTH 百分比的 AUC 为 1.000,皮质醇百分比的 AUC 为 0.983):去氨加压素试验有望准确识别促肾上腺皮质激素依赖性 CS 的潜在病因,从而减少对侵入性手术的依赖,并为管理复杂病例提供实用的解决方案。要验证去氨加压素试验在常规临床实践中的实用性,还需要对更大的群体进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Desmopressin Stimulation Test in the Comprehensive Assessment of ACTH-Dependent Cushing's Syndrome: A Comparative Analysis with BIPSS and TSS.

Background: Cushing's syndrome (CS) poses diagnostic challenges, particularly in distinguishing pituitary-dependent Cushing's syndrome, Cushing's disease (CD), from the ectopic ACTH syndrome (EAS). This study evaluated the diagnostic value of the desmopressin stimulation test (DST) in patients with ACTH-dependent CS in helping this discrimination.

Methods: Twenty-three ACTH-dependent CS patients underwent sequential DST, bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling (BIPSS), and transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). Two definitions of a positive DST results were applied. Diagnostic performance was assessed using sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and likelihood ratios. To avoid bias from predetermined criteria, we generated univariate receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves, plotting sensitivity against 1-specificity at various percentage cortisol and ACTH response levels.

Results: Against BIPSS, DST demonstrated robust sensitivity (Definition 1: 90.0%, Definition 2: 76.2%) and overall accuracy (Definition 1: 87.0%, Definition 2: 73.9%). PPV was high (Definition 1: 95.0%, Definition 2: 94.1%), but NPV indicated potential false negatives. Compared to TSS, DST showed good sensitivity (Definition 1: 90.9-77.3%) and PPV (100.0%) but limited NPV (16.7%). The likelihood ratios emphasized the diagnostic value of the test. Notably, against TSS, DST showed perfect discriminatory power (AUC 1.000 for percent ACTH, 0.983 for percent cortisol).

Conclusion: The desmopressin test shows promise in accurately identifying the underlying cause of ACTH-dependent CS, potentially reducing the reliance on invasive procedures and providing a practical solution for managing complex cases. Further research with larger cohorts is required to validate the utility of the DST in routine clinical practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Endocrine Research
Endocrine Research 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes original articles relating to endocrinology in the broadest context. Subjects of interest include: receptors and mechanism of action of hormones, methodological advances in the detection and measurement of hormones; structure and chemical properties of hormones. Invitations to submit Brief Reviews are issued to specific authors by the Editors.
期刊最新文献
Antithyroid Antibodies and Reproductive Parameters of Women with Hashimoto's Thyroiditis. Adverse Events of Adjuvant Mitotane Treatment for Adrenocortical Carcinoma Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Recurrent Adrenocortical Carcinoma. Monogenic Diabetes: A Comprehensive Overview and Therapeutic Management of Subtypes of Mody. The Investigation of Kisspeptin, Spexin and Galanin in Euthyroid Women with Hashimoto's Thyroiditis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1