青少年健康行为评定量表的心理计量特性。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Evaluation & the Health Professions Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1177/01632787241263372
Karlie M Mirabelli, Brandon K Schultz, Alexander M Schoemann, Sequoyah R Bell, Suzanne Lazorick
{"title":"青少年健康行为评定量表的心理计量特性。","authors":"Karlie M Mirabelli, Brandon K Schultz, Alexander M Schoemann, Sequoyah R Bell, Suzanne Lazorick","doi":"10.1177/01632787241263372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined the psychometric properties of the <i>Physical Activity, Nutrition, and Technology</i> (PANT) survey, developed by researchers to track weight management behaviors among youth. Data from 2,039 middle school students (<i>M</i> age = 12.4, <i>SD</i> = .5; 51.4% girls) were analyzed to explore and then confirm the factor structure of the PANT survey. We also examined the bivariate associations between the PANT survey, body mass index (BMI), and the Progressive Aerobic Cardiorespiratory Endurance Run (PACER). Results suggest that the PANT survey is comprised of two factors-<i>Physical Activity</i> and <i>Healthy Choices</i>-each with adequate internal consistency (<i>α</i> = .79 and 0.86, respectively). The Physical Activity subscale appears to be significantly associated with both <i>z</i>-BMI (<i>r</i> = -0.10, <i>p</i> < .001) and the PACER (<i>r</i> = 0.33, <i>p</i> < .001) in the anticipated directions, but the criterion validity of the Healthy Choices subscale is less clear. We discuss these findings and explore future directions for developing meaningful self-report wellness behavior scales for youth.</p>","PeriodicalId":12315,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":"1632787241263372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Properties of a Wellness Behavior Rating Scale for Young Adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Karlie M Mirabelli, Brandon K Schultz, Alexander M Schoemann, Sequoyah R Bell, Suzanne Lazorick\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01632787241263372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We examined the psychometric properties of the <i>Physical Activity, Nutrition, and Technology</i> (PANT) survey, developed by researchers to track weight management behaviors among youth. Data from 2,039 middle school students (<i>M</i> age = 12.4, <i>SD</i> = .5; 51.4% girls) were analyzed to explore and then confirm the factor structure of the PANT survey. We also examined the bivariate associations between the PANT survey, body mass index (BMI), and the Progressive Aerobic Cardiorespiratory Endurance Run (PACER). Results suggest that the PANT survey is comprised of two factors-<i>Physical Activity</i> and <i>Healthy Choices</i>-each with adequate internal consistency (<i>α</i> = .79 and 0.86, respectively). The Physical Activity subscale appears to be significantly associated with both <i>z</i>-BMI (<i>r</i> = -0.10, <i>p</i> < .001) and the PACER (<i>r</i> = 0.33, <i>p</i> < .001) in the anticipated directions, but the criterion validity of the Healthy Choices subscale is less clear. We discuss these findings and explore future directions for developing meaningful self-report wellness behavior scales for youth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12315,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evaluation & the Health Professions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1632787241263372\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evaluation & the Health Professions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787241263372\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation & the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01632787241263372","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究了体育活动、营养和技术(PANT)调查的心理测量特性,该调查由研究人员开发,旨在跟踪青少年的体重管理行为。我们分析了 2,039 名初中生(中位年龄 = 12.4,标准差 = 0.5;51.4% 为女生)的数据,以探索并确认 PANT 调查的因子结构。我们还研究了 PANT 调查、体重指数(BMI)和渐进有氧心肺耐力跑(PACER)之间的双变量关联。结果表明,PANT 调查由两个因子组成--体育活动和健康选择--每个因子都具有足够的内部一致性(α 分别为 0.79 和 0.86)。体力活动分量表似乎与 z-BMI (r = -0.10,p < .001)和 PACER(r = 0.33,p < .001)在预期方向上有显著关联,但健康选择分量表的标准有效性则不太明确。我们讨论了这些发现,并探讨了为青少年开发有意义的自我报告健康行为量表的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric Properties of a Wellness Behavior Rating Scale for Young Adolescents.

We examined the psychometric properties of the Physical Activity, Nutrition, and Technology (PANT) survey, developed by researchers to track weight management behaviors among youth. Data from 2,039 middle school students (M age = 12.4, SD = .5; 51.4% girls) were analyzed to explore and then confirm the factor structure of the PANT survey. We also examined the bivariate associations between the PANT survey, body mass index (BMI), and the Progressive Aerobic Cardiorespiratory Endurance Run (PACER). Results suggest that the PANT survey is comprised of two factors-Physical Activity and Healthy Choices-each with adequate internal consistency (α = .79 and 0.86, respectively). The Physical Activity subscale appears to be significantly associated with both z-BMI (r = -0.10, p < .001) and the PACER (r = 0.33, p < .001) in the anticipated directions, but the criterion validity of the Healthy Choices subscale is less clear. We discuss these findings and explore future directions for developing meaningful self-report wellness behavior scales for youth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Evaluation & the Health Professions is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal that provides health-related professionals with state-of-the-art methodological, measurement, and statistical tools for conceptualizing the etiology of health promotion and problems, and developing, implementing, and evaluating health programs, teaching and training services, and products that pertain to a myriad of health dimensions. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Average time from submission to first decision: 31 days
期刊最新文献
Analyzing the Effects of a Repeated Reading Intervention on Reading Fluency With Generalized Linear Mixed Models. Evaluation of a Parenting Program for Mothers With a Borderline Personality Disorder: A Multiple Baseline Single-Case Experimental Design Study. Single-Case Study of the Feasibility of Parent Training and Change in Parenting in Comparison to Baseline, in Adolescents With a Major Depressive Disorder. Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models in the Analysis of Count and Rate Data in Single-case Eperimental Designs: A Step-by-step Tutorial. Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Low Back Activity Confidence Scale (LoBACS).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1