问题性耳鸣的发生率和预测因素。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2378804
Joseph A de Gruy, William W Laurenzo, Thanh-Huyen Vu, Oishika Paul, Christopher Lee, Christopher Spankovich
{"title":"问题性耳鸣的发生率和预测因素。","authors":"Joseph A de Gruy, William W Laurenzo, Thanh-Huyen Vu, Oishika Paul, Christopher Lee, Christopher Spankovich","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2378804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the prevalence and characteristics of problematic tinnitus in a representative United States (US) sample.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study of the NHANES database from 2011-2012 and 2015-2016.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>8029 records were included for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of any tinnitus was 16.32%. Only 1.38% reported tinnitus as a big problem or worse. Univariate analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between tinnitus constancy and duration with severity, where more constant perception and longer duration was related to increased severity (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Multivariable models showed a clear relationship of increased odds ratio (OR) of problematic tinnitus with constancy of tinnitus but not duration. Furthermore, multivariable models showed higher Body Mass Index (OR= 1.013, 95% CI: 0.99-1.03), sleep trouble (OR = 2.016, 95% CI: 1.52-2.66) and comorbidities (OR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.06-1.94) were all associated with increased problematic tinnitus, but not non-problematic tinnitus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that the prevalence of problematic tinnitus is much lower than the prevalence of any tinnitus. There was also a relationship between BMI, sleep trouble, other comorbidities and increased odds of problematic tinnitus. Tinnitus severity was significantly related to constancy of perception but had a less clear relationship to duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and predictors of problematic tinnitus.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph A de Gruy, William W Laurenzo, Thanh-Huyen Vu, Oishika Paul, Christopher Lee, Christopher Spankovich\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14992027.2024.2378804\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the prevalence and characteristics of problematic tinnitus in a representative United States (US) sample.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study of the NHANES database from 2011-2012 and 2015-2016.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>8029 records were included for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The prevalence of any tinnitus was 16.32%. Only 1.38% reported tinnitus as a big problem or worse. Univariate analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between tinnitus constancy and duration with severity, where more constant perception and longer duration was related to increased severity (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Multivariable models showed a clear relationship of increased odds ratio (OR) of problematic tinnitus with constancy of tinnitus but not duration. Furthermore, multivariable models showed higher Body Mass Index (OR= 1.013, 95% CI: 0.99-1.03), sleep trouble (OR = 2.016, 95% CI: 1.52-2.66) and comorbidities (OR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.06-1.94) were all associated with increased problematic tinnitus, but not non-problematic tinnitus.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study demonstrated that the prevalence of problematic tinnitus is much lower than the prevalence of any tinnitus. There was also a relationship between BMI, sleep trouble, other comorbidities and increased odds of problematic tinnitus. Tinnitus severity was significantly related to constancy of perception but had a less clear relationship to duration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2378804\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2378804","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定具有代表性的美国样本中问题性耳鸣的发生率和特征:在具有代表性的美国样本中确定问题性耳鸣的患病率和特征:研究样本:纳入 8029 条记录进行分析:结果:任何耳鸣的患病率为 16.32%。只有1.38%的人称耳鸣为大问题或更严重。单变量分析表明,耳鸣的持续性和持续时间与耳鸣严重程度之间存在统计学意义上的显著关系,持续性更强、持续时间更长的耳鸣与耳鸣严重程度的增加有关(p 结论:我们的研究表明,问题性耳鸣的流行率与耳鸣严重程度之间存在统计学意义上的显著关系:我们的研究表明,问题性耳鸣的发病率远低于任何耳鸣的发病率。体重指数、睡眠问题、其他合并症与问题性耳鸣发生率的增加也有关系。耳鸣的严重程度与感知的恒定性有明显关系,但与持续时间的关系不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence and predictors of problematic tinnitus.

Objective: To determine the prevalence and characteristics of problematic tinnitus in a representative United States (US) sample.

Design: Cross-sectional study of the NHANES database from 2011-2012 and 2015-2016.

Study sample: 8029 records were included for analysis.

Results: The prevalence of any tinnitus was 16.32%. Only 1.38% reported tinnitus as a big problem or worse. Univariate analysis revealed a statistically significant relationship between tinnitus constancy and duration with severity, where more constant perception and longer duration was related to increased severity (p < 0.0001). Multivariable models showed a clear relationship of increased odds ratio (OR) of problematic tinnitus with constancy of tinnitus but not duration. Furthermore, multivariable models showed higher Body Mass Index (OR= 1.013, 95% CI: 0.99-1.03), sleep trouble (OR = 2.016, 95% CI: 1.52-2.66) and comorbidities (OR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.06-1.94) were all associated with increased problematic tinnitus, but not non-problematic tinnitus.

Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the prevalence of problematic tinnitus is much lower than the prevalence of any tinnitus. There was also a relationship between BMI, sleep trouble, other comorbidities and increased odds of problematic tinnitus. Tinnitus severity was significantly related to constancy of perception but had a less clear relationship to duration.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
期刊最新文献
The influence of age and hearing loss on thresholds measured using the TFS-AF test. Simplified frequency selectivity measure as a potential candidate for hearing screening: changes with masker level and test-retest reliability of self-administered testing. "Can physical activity reduce the risk of having tinnitus?" Risky leisure noise exposure during the transition to adulthood and the impact of major life events - results of the OHRKAN cohort study. Applications of automatic speech recognition and text-to-speech technologies for hearing assessment: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1