主动、被动和徒手治疗干预对退伍军人腰痛理疗后医疗事件升级的影响。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2024-10-02 DOI:10.1093/ptj/pzae101
John M Mayer, Michael Jason Highsmith, Jason Maikos, Charity G Patterson, Joseph Kakyomya, Bridget Smith, Nigel Shenoy, Christopher L Dearth, Shawn Farrokhi
{"title":"主动、被动和徒手治疗干预对退伍军人腰痛理疗后医疗事件升级的影响。","authors":"John M Mayer, Michael Jason Highsmith, Jason Maikos, Charity G Patterson, Joseph Kakyomya, Bridget Smith, Nigel Shenoy, Christopher L Dearth, Shawn Farrokhi","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzae101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to examine the associations between active, passive, and manual therapy interventions with the escalation-of-care events following physical therapist care for veterans with low back pain (LBP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 3618 veterans who received physical therapist care for LBP between January 1, 2015 and January 1, 2018. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse was utilized to identify LBP-related physical therapist visits and procedures, as well as opioid prescription and non-physical therapy clinic encounters. The association between physical therapist interventions with 1-year escalation-of-care events were assessed using adjusted odds ratios from logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly all veterans (98%) received active interventions, but only a minority (31%) received manual therapy. In the 1-year follow-up period, the odds of receiving an opioid prescription were 30% lower for those who received manual therapy in addition to active interventions, as compared with patients who received only active interventions. Moreover, the odds of receiving primary care, specialty care, and diagnostic testing were 30% to 130% higher for patients who received electrical stimulation or more than 1 passive intervention in addition to active treatments, as compared with patients who received only active interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of manual therapy along with active interventions was associated with reduced prescription of opioids, while utilization of specific passive interventions such as electrical stimulation or multiple modalities in conjunction with active interventions resulted in increased escalation-of-care events.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The use of active interventions, which is supported by most clinical practice guidelines, was the cornerstone of physical therapist care for veterans with LBP. However, the use of clinical practice guideline-recommended manual therapy interventions was low but associated with reduced opioid prescriptions. The use of 2 or more different passive interventions along with active interventions was common (34%) and associated with less-than-optimal escalation-of-care outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Active, Passive, and Manual Therapy Interventions on Escalation of Health Care Events After Physical Therapist Care in Veterans With Low Back Pain.\",\"authors\":\"John M Mayer, Michael Jason Highsmith, Jason Maikos, Charity G Patterson, Joseph Kakyomya, Bridget Smith, Nigel Shenoy, Christopher L Dearth, Shawn Farrokhi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ptj/pzae101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to examine the associations between active, passive, and manual therapy interventions with the escalation-of-care events following physical therapist care for veterans with low back pain (LBP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 3618 veterans who received physical therapist care for LBP between January 1, 2015 and January 1, 2018. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse was utilized to identify LBP-related physical therapist visits and procedures, as well as opioid prescription and non-physical therapy clinic encounters. The association between physical therapist interventions with 1-year escalation-of-care events were assessed using adjusted odds ratios from logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nearly all veterans (98%) received active interventions, but only a minority (31%) received manual therapy. In the 1-year follow-up period, the odds of receiving an opioid prescription were 30% lower for those who received manual therapy in addition to active interventions, as compared with patients who received only active interventions. Moreover, the odds of receiving primary care, specialty care, and diagnostic testing were 30% to 130% higher for patients who received electrical stimulation or more than 1 passive intervention in addition to active treatments, as compared with patients who received only active interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of manual therapy along with active interventions was associated with reduced prescription of opioids, while utilization of specific passive interventions such as electrical stimulation or multiple modalities in conjunction with active interventions resulted in increased escalation-of-care events.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The use of active interventions, which is supported by most clinical practice guidelines, was the cornerstone of physical therapist care for veterans with LBP. However, the use of clinical practice guideline-recommended manual therapy interventions was low but associated with reduced opioid prescriptions. The use of 2 or more different passive interventions along with active interventions was common (34%) and associated with less-than-optimal escalation-of-care outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzae101\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzae101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在探讨主动、被动和徒手治疗干预措施与退伍军人腰背痛(LBP)理疗师护理后护理升级事件之间的关联:我们对 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2018 年 1 月 1 日期间因腰背痛接受理疗师治疗的 3618 名退伍军人进行了回顾性队列研究。研究利用退伍军人事务部企业数据仓库(VA Corporate Data Warehouse)来识别与枸杞多糖相关的理疗师就诊和治疗过程,以及阿片类药物处方和非理疗诊所就诊情况。理疗师干预与 1 年护理升级事件之间的关联采用逻辑回归的调整赔率进行评估:几乎所有退伍军人(98%)都接受了积极干预,但只有少数人(31%)接受了人工疗法。在为期一年的随访期间,与只接受积极干预的患者相比,除了积极干预还接受人工疗法的患者接受阿片类药物处方的几率要低 30%。此外,与只接受主动干预的患者相比,除了接受主动治疗外还接受电刺激或一种以上被动干预的患者接受初级保健、专科护理和诊断检测的几率要高出30%-130%:结论:在主动干预的同时使用手法治疗与阿片类药物处方的减少有关,而在主动干预的同时使用特定的被动干预(如电刺激或多种方式)会导致护理升级事件的增加:大多数《临床实践指南》(CPG)都支持使用主动干预措施,这是物理治疗师为患有腰背痛的退伍军人提供护理的基石。然而,CPG 推荐的徒手治疗干预措施使用率较低,但与阿片类药物处方的减少有关。使用 2 种或 2 种以上不同的被动干预措施和主动干预措施的情况很普遍(34%),而且与护理升级效果不理想有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Influence of Active, Passive, and Manual Therapy Interventions on Escalation of Health Care Events After Physical Therapist Care in Veterans With Low Back Pain.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine the associations between active, passive, and manual therapy interventions with the escalation-of-care events following physical therapist care for veterans with low back pain (LBP).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted in 3618 veterans who received physical therapist care for LBP between January 1, 2015 and January 1, 2018. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Corporate Data Warehouse was utilized to identify LBP-related physical therapist visits and procedures, as well as opioid prescription and non-physical therapy clinic encounters. The association between physical therapist interventions with 1-year escalation-of-care events were assessed using adjusted odds ratios from logistic regression.

Results: Nearly all veterans (98%) received active interventions, but only a minority (31%) received manual therapy. In the 1-year follow-up period, the odds of receiving an opioid prescription were 30% lower for those who received manual therapy in addition to active interventions, as compared with patients who received only active interventions. Moreover, the odds of receiving primary care, specialty care, and diagnostic testing were 30% to 130% higher for patients who received electrical stimulation or more than 1 passive intervention in addition to active treatments, as compared with patients who received only active interventions.

Conclusion: The use of manual therapy along with active interventions was associated with reduced prescription of opioids, while utilization of specific passive interventions such as electrical stimulation or multiple modalities in conjunction with active interventions resulted in increased escalation-of-care events.

Impact: The use of active interventions, which is supported by most clinical practice guidelines, was the cornerstone of physical therapist care for veterans with LBP. However, the use of clinical practice guideline-recommended manual therapy interventions was low but associated with reduced opioid prescriptions. The use of 2 or more different passive interventions along with active interventions was common (34%) and associated with less-than-optimal escalation-of-care outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
期刊最新文献
Outpatient Physical Therapy Attendance by Older Adults After Emergency Department Discharge was a Predictor for Lower 30-Day Revisits-But Demographic Factors Affected Attendance. Diabetic Foot Ulcer beyond Wound Closure: Clinical Practice Guideline. Optimizing the Accuracy and Precision of the Minimal Detectable Change Statistic: Secondary Analysis of Test-Retest Data from the NIH Toolbox Study. Chronic Underrepresentation of Females and Women in Stroke Research Adversely Impacts Clinical Care. Online Graded Motor Imagery Is Effective in Women Diagnosed with Pelvic Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1