根据新辅助化疗患者前哨淋巴结受累情况和生物学亚型预测腋窝淋巴结阳性数目

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY BMC Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1186/s12893-024-02500-5
Latif Yilmaz, Tulay Kus, Alper Aytekin, Gokmen Aktas, Evren Uzun, Gokturk Maralcan
{"title":"根据新辅助化疗患者前哨淋巴结受累情况和生物学亚型预测腋窝淋巴结阳性数目","authors":"Latif Yilmaz, Tulay Kus, Alper Aytekin, Gokmen Aktas, Evren Uzun, Gokturk Maralcan","doi":"10.1186/s12893-024-02500-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for assessing axillary lymph node status in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. However, the approach to axillary surgery after neoadjuvant treatment is still controversial. In the present study, our objective was to predict the pathological nodal stage based on SLNB results and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients who initially presented with clinical N1 positivity but whose disease status was converted to clinical N0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After NAC, 150 clinically node-negative patients were included. The relationships between clinicopathologic parameters and the number of positive lymph nodes in SLNBs and ALNDs were assessed through binary/multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 150 patients, 78 patients had negative SLNBs, and 72 patients had positive SLNBs. According to the ALND data of 21 patients with SLNB1+, there was no additional node involvement (80.8%), 1-2 lymph nodes were positive in 5 patients (19.2%), and no patient had ≥ 3 lymph nodes involved. Following the detection of SLNB1 + positivity, the rate of negative non-sentinel nodes were 75% in the luminal A/B subgroup, 100% in the HER-2-positive subgroup, and 100% in the triple-negative subgroup. Patients with a lower T stage (T1-3 vs. T4), fewer than 4 clinical nodes before NAC (< 4 vs. ≥4), and a decreased postoperative Ki-67 index (< 10% vs. stable/increase) were included. According to both univariate and multivariate analyses, being in the triple-negative or HER2-positive subgroup, compared to the luminal A/B subgroup (luminal A/B vs. HER2-positive/triple-negative), was found to be predictive of complete lymph node response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The number of SLNB-positive nodes, tumor-related parameters, and response to treatment may predict no additional nodes to be positive at ALND.</p>","PeriodicalId":49229,"journal":{"name":"BMC Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264838/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction of the number of positive axillary lymph nodes according to sentinel lymph node involvement and biological subtypes in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Latif Yilmaz, Tulay Kus, Alper Aytekin, Gokmen Aktas, Evren Uzun, Gokturk Maralcan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12893-024-02500-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for assessing axillary lymph node status in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. However, the approach to axillary surgery after neoadjuvant treatment is still controversial. In the present study, our objective was to predict the pathological nodal stage based on SLNB results and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients who initially presented with clinical N1 positivity but whose disease status was converted to clinical N0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After NAC, 150 clinically node-negative patients were included. The relationships between clinicopathologic parameters and the number of positive lymph nodes in SLNBs and ALNDs were assessed through binary/multivariate logistic regression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 150 patients, 78 patients had negative SLNBs, and 72 patients had positive SLNBs. According to the ALND data of 21 patients with SLNB1+, there was no additional node involvement (80.8%), 1-2 lymph nodes were positive in 5 patients (19.2%), and no patient had ≥ 3 lymph nodes involved. Following the detection of SLNB1 + positivity, the rate of negative non-sentinel nodes were 75% in the luminal A/B subgroup, 100% in the HER-2-positive subgroup, and 100% in the triple-negative subgroup. Patients with a lower T stage (T1-3 vs. T4), fewer than 4 clinical nodes before NAC (< 4 vs. ≥4), and a decreased postoperative Ki-67 index (< 10% vs. stable/increase) were included. According to both univariate and multivariate analyses, being in the triple-negative or HER2-positive subgroup, compared to the luminal A/B subgroup (luminal A/B vs. HER2-positive/triple-negative), was found to be predictive of complete lymph node response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The number of SLNB-positive nodes, tumor-related parameters, and response to treatment may predict no additional nodes to be positive at ALND.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264838/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02500-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-024-02500-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前哨淋巴结活检(SLNB)已取代腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND),用于评估临床结节阴性乳腺癌患者的腋窝淋巴结状态。然而,新辅助治疗后的腋窝手术方法仍存在争议。在本研究中,我们的目的是根据 SLNB 结果和新辅助化疗(NAC)后临床 N1 阳性但疾病状态转为临床 N0 的患者的临床病理特征预测病理结节分期:纳入了150例新辅助化疗后临床结节阴性的患者。通过二元/多元逻辑回归分析评估了SLNB和ALND中临床病理参数与阳性淋巴结数量之间的关系:在150名患者中,78名患者的SLNB结果为阴性,72名患者的SLNB结果为阳性。21例SLNB1+患者的ALND数据显示,没有其他淋巴结受累(80.8%),5例患者有1-2个淋巴结阳性(19.2%),没有患者有≥3个淋巴结受累。在检测到 SLNB1 + 阳性后,管腔 A/B 亚组的非前哨结节阴性率为 75%,HER-2 阳性亚组为 100%,三阴性亚组为 100%。T分期较低(T1-3 与 T4)、NAC前临床结节少于 4 个的患者(结论:SLNB阳性结节的数量较少):SLNB阳性结节的数量、肿瘤相关参数以及对治疗的反应可能预示着ALND时不会再有结节阳性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prediction of the number of positive axillary lymph nodes according to sentinel lymph node involvement and biological subtypes in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Background: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for assessing axillary lymph node status in clinically node-negative breast cancer patients. However, the approach to axillary surgery after neoadjuvant treatment is still controversial. In the present study, our objective was to predict the pathological nodal stage based on SLNB results and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients who initially presented with clinical N1 positivity but whose disease status was converted to clinical N0 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

Materials and methods: After NAC, 150 clinically node-negative patients were included. The relationships between clinicopathologic parameters and the number of positive lymph nodes in SLNBs and ALNDs were assessed through binary/multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results: Among 150 patients, 78 patients had negative SLNBs, and 72 patients had positive SLNBs. According to the ALND data of 21 patients with SLNB1+, there was no additional node involvement (80.8%), 1-2 lymph nodes were positive in 5 patients (19.2%), and no patient had ≥ 3 lymph nodes involved. Following the detection of SLNB1 + positivity, the rate of negative non-sentinel nodes were 75% in the luminal A/B subgroup, 100% in the HER-2-positive subgroup, and 100% in the triple-negative subgroup. Patients with a lower T stage (T1-3 vs. T4), fewer than 4 clinical nodes before NAC (< 4 vs. ≥4), and a decreased postoperative Ki-67 index (< 10% vs. stable/increase) were included. According to both univariate and multivariate analyses, being in the triple-negative or HER2-positive subgroup, compared to the luminal A/B subgroup (luminal A/B vs. HER2-positive/triple-negative), was found to be predictive of complete lymph node response.

Conclusion: The number of SLNB-positive nodes, tumor-related parameters, and response to treatment may predict no additional nodes to be positive at ALND.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Surgery
BMC Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
391
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: BMC Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on surgical research, training, and practice.
期刊最新文献
Real-world study on the application of enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in video-assisted thoracoscopic day surgery for pulmonary nodule resection. The seven-day cumulative post-esophagectomy inflammatory response predicts cancer recurrence. Seprafilm® and adhesive small bowel obstruction in colorectal/abdominal surgery: an updated systematic review. The safety and efficacy of stapler method for transection of the pancreatic parenchyma during pancreatoduodenectomy (STRAP-PD trial): study protocol for a randomized control trial. Challenges and opportunities for Mohs surgery implementation in African healthcare systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1