从文本数据中自动检测自闭症谱系障碍的跨数据集研究。

IF 5.3 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1111/acps.13737
Aleksander Wawer, Izabela Chojnicka, Justyna Sarzyńska-Wawer, Małgorzata Krawczyk
{"title":"从文本数据中自动检测自闭症谱系障碍的跨数据集研究。","authors":"Aleksander Wawer, Izabela Chojnicka, Justyna Sarzyńska-Wawer, Małgorzata Krawczyk","doi":"10.1111/acps.13737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goals of this article are as follows. First, to investigate the possibility of detecting autism spectrum disorder (ASD) from text data using the latest generation of machine learning tools. Second, to compare model performance on two datasets of transcribed statements, collected using two different diagnostic tools. Third, to investigate the feasibility of knowledge transfer between models trained on both datasets and check if data augmentation can help alleviate the problem of a small number of observations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We explore two techniques to detect ASD. The first one is based on fine-tuning HerBERT, a BERT-based, monolingual deep transformer neural network. The second one uses the newest, multipurpose text embeddings from OpenAI and a classifier. We apply the methods to two separate datasets of transcribed statements, collected using two different diagnostic tools: thought, language, and communication (TLC) and autism diagnosis observation schedule-2 (ADOS-2). We conducted several cross-dataset experiments in both a zero-shot setting and a setting where models are pretrained on one dataset and then training continues on another to test the possibility of knowledge transfer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unlike previous studies, the models we tested obtained average results on ADOS-2 data but reached very good performance of the models in TLC. We did not observe any benefits from knowledge transfer between datasets. We observed relatively poor performance of models trained on augmented data and hypothesize that data augmentation by back translation obfuscates autism-specific signals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of machine learning models that detect ASD from text data is improving, but model results are dependent on the type of input data or diagnostic tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":108,"journal":{"name":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cross-dataset study on automatic detection of autism spectrum disorder from text data.\",\"authors\":\"Aleksander Wawer, Izabela Chojnicka, Justyna Sarzyńska-Wawer, Małgorzata Krawczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acps.13737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The goals of this article are as follows. First, to investigate the possibility of detecting autism spectrum disorder (ASD) from text data using the latest generation of machine learning tools. Second, to compare model performance on two datasets of transcribed statements, collected using two different diagnostic tools. Third, to investigate the feasibility of knowledge transfer between models trained on both datasets and check if data augmentation can help alleviate the problem of a small number of observations.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We explore two techniques to detect ASD. The first one is based on fine-tuning HerBERT, a BERT-based, monolingual deep transformer neural network. The second one uses the newest, multipurpose text embeddings from OpenAI and a classifier. We apply the methods to two separate datasets of transcribed statements, collected using two different diagnostic tools: thought, language, and communication (TLC) and autism diagnosis observation schedule-2 (ADOS-2). We conducted several cross-dataset experiments in both a zero-shot setting and a setting where models are pretrained on one dataset and then training continues on another to test the possibility of knowledge transfer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Unlike previous studies, the models we tested obtained average results on ADOS-2 data but reached very good performance of the models in TLC. We did not observe any benefits from knowledge transfer between datasets. We observed relatively poor performance of models trained on augmented data and hypothesize that data augmentation by back translation obfuscates autism-specific signals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of machine learning models that detect ASD from text data is improving, but model results are dependent on the type of input data or diagnostic tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":108,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13737\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.13737","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:本文的目标如下。首先,研究使用最新一代机器学习工具从文本数据中检测自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)的可能性。其次,比较使用两种不同诊断工具收集的两个语句转录数据集的模型性能。第三,研究在两个数据集上训练的模型之间进行知识转移的可行性,并检查数据扩增是否有助于缓解观测数据数量较少的问题:我们探索了两种检测 ASD 的技术。第一种技术基于对 HerBERT(一种基于 BERT 的单语深度变换器神经网络)的微调。第二种技术使用 OpenAI 最新的多用途文本嵌入和分类器。我们将这些方法应用于两个独立的语句转录数据集,这些数据集是使用两种不同的诊断工具收集的:思维、语言和交流(TLC)和自闭症诊断观察表-2(ADOS-2)。我们进行了多项跨数据集实验,既有零点测试,也有在一个数据集上对模型进行预训练,然后在另一个数据集上继续训练,以测试知识转移的可能性:与之前的研究不同,我们测试的模型在 ADOS-2 数据上的结果一般,但在 TLC 中的表现非常好。我们没有发现数据集之间的知识转移有任何好处。我们观察到在增强数据上训练的模型性能相对较差,并假设通过反向翻译增强数据会混淆自闭症的特异性信号:从文本数据中检测自闭症的机器学习模型的质量正在提高,但模型结果取决于输入数据或诊断工具的类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A cross-dataset study on automatic detection of autism spectrum disorder from text data.

Objective: The goals of this article are as follows. First, to investigate the possibility of detecting autism spectrum disorder (ASD) from text data using the latest generation of machine learning tools. Second, to compare model performance on two datasets of transcribed statements, collected using two different diagnostic tools. Third, to investigate the feasibility of knowledge transfer between models trained on both datasets and check if data augmentation can help alleviate the problem of a small number of observations.

Method: We explore two techniques to detect ASD. The first one is based on fine-tuning HerBERT, a BERT-based, monolingual deep transformer neural network. The second one uses the newest, multipurpose text embeddings from OpenAI and a classifier. We apply the methods to two separate datasets of transcribed statements, collected using two different diagnostic tools: thought, language, and communication (TLC) and autism diagnosis observation schedule-2 (ADOS-2). We conducted several cross-dataset experiments in both a zero-shot setting and a setting where models are pretrained on one dataset and then training continues on another to test the possibility of knowledge transfer.

Results: Unlike previous studies, the models we tested obtained average results on ADOS-2 data but reached very good performance of the models in TLC. We did not observe any benefits from knowledge transfer between datasets. We observed relatively poor performance of models trained on augmented data and hypothesize that data augmentation by back translation obfuscates autism-specific signals.

Conclusion: The quality of machine learning models that detect ASD from text data is improving, but model results are dependent on the type of input data or diagnostic tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
135
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica acts as an international forum for the dissemination of information advancing the science and practice of psychiatry. In particular we focus on communicating frontline research to clinical psychiatrists and psychiatric researchers. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica has traditionally been and remains a journal focusing predominantly on clinical psychiatry, but translational psychiatry is a topic of growing importance to our readers. Therefore, the journal welcomes submission of manuscripts based on both clinical- and more translational (e.g. preclinical and epidemiological) research. When preparing manuscripts based on translational studies for submission to Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, the authors should place emphasis on the clinical significance of the research question and the findings. Manuscripts based solely on preclinical research (e.g. animal models) are normally not considered for publication in the Journal.
期刊最新文献
Letter to the Editor Concerning "Glucagon-Like Peptide Agonists for Weight Management in Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis". Prediction of electroconvulsive therapy outcome: A network analysis approach. How to treat antipsychotic-related weight gain and metabolic disturbances: Is there a role for GLP-1 receptor agonists? Issue Information Variation of subclinical psychosis as a function of population density across different European settings: Findings from the multi-national EU-GEI study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1