Hannah C Timmins, Alexandra E Thompson, Matthew C Kiernan
{"title":"肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症的诊断标准。","authors":"Hannah C Timmins, Alexandra E Thompson, Matthew C Kiernan","doi":"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The present review will discuss the evolution of diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and biomarker considerations.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>To address the limitations of existing ALS diagnostic criteria, a consortium of key stakeholders developed the Gold Coast consensus criteria (GCC). The GCC has similar or greater sensitivity compared with the revised El Escorial (rEEC) and Awaji criteria (AC), particularly for atypical phenotypes, maintained across disease duration, severity, and site of onset. In addition to improving diagnostic sensitivity, using the GCC in clinical trials may promote an increased enrolment of up to 50% of ALS patients who do not currently meet the full diagnostic eligibility requirements of the rEEC. Future inclusion of genetic biomarkers may mitigate some limitations of the GCC, to further improve diagnostic utility. In advance of such a process, validation of these biomarkers will be required before inclusion as additional criteria.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The GCC are simpler to use than previous consensus criteria, with demonstrated greater sensitivity and, enabling an earlier and more definitive ALS diagnosis, thereby facilitating wider enrolment into clinical trials. Broader implementation of the GCC in clinical trial settings is currently underway, globally.</p>","PeriodicalId":11059,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"570-576"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah C Timmins, Alexandra E Thompson, Matthew C Kiernan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WCO.0000000000001302\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The present review will discuss the evolution of diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and biomarker considerations.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>To address the limitations of existing ALS diagnostic criteria, a consortium of key stakeholders developed the Gold Coast consensus criteria (GCC). The GCC has similar or greater sensitivity compared with the revised El Escorial (rEEC) and Awaji criteria (AC), particularly for atypical phenotypes, maintained across disease duration, severity, and site of onset. In addition to improving diagnostic sensitivity, using the GCC in clinical trials may promote an increased enrolment of up to 50% of ALS patients who do not currently meet the full diagnostic eligibility requirements of the rEEC. Future inclusion of genetic biomarkers may mitigate some limitations of the GCC, to further improve diagnostic utility. In advance of such a process, validation of these biomarkers will be required before inclusion as additional criteria.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>The GCC are simpler to use than previous consensus criteria, with demonstrated greater sensitivity and, enabling an earlier and more definitive ALS diagnosis, thereby facilitating wider enrolment into clinical trials. Broader implementation of the GCC in clinical trial settings is currently underway, globally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"570-576\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000001302\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0000000000001302","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
综述的目的:本综述将讨论肌萎缩性脊髓侧索硬化症(ALS)诊断标准的演变和生物标志物的考虑因素:为了解决现有 ALS 诊断标准的局限性,一个由主要利益相关者组成的联盟制定了黄金海岸共识标准(GCC)。与修订版埃斯科里亚尔标准(rEEC)和淡路标准(AC)相比,黄金海岸共识标准具有相似或更高的灵敏度,尤其是对非典型表型的灵敏度,并在病程、严重程度和发病部位方面保持不变。在临床试验中使用 GCC 除了能提高诊断灵敏度外,还能使目前不符合 rEEC 全部诊断资格要求的 ALS 患者的入选率提高 50%。未来纳入基因生物标记物可能会缓解 GCC 的某些局限性,从而进一步提高诊断效用。总结:GCC 比以前的共识标准更简单易用,灵敏度更高,能更早更明确地诊断 ALS,从而促进更多患者加入临床试验。目前,全球正在临床试验环境中更广泛地实施 GCC。
Diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Purpose of review: The present review will discuss the evolution of diagnostic criteria for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and biomarker considerations.
Recent findings: To address the limitations of existing ALS diagnostic criteria, a consortium of key stakeholders developed the Gold Coast consensus criteria (GCC). The GCC has similar or greater sensitivity compared with the revised El Escorial (rEEC) and Awaji criteria (AC), particularly for atypical phenotypes, maintained across disease duration, severity, and site of onset. In addition to improving diagnostic sensitivity, using the GCC in clinical trials may promote an increased enrolment of up to 50% of ALS patients who do not currently meet the full diagnostic eligibility requirements of the rEEC. Future inclusion of genetic biomarkers may mitigate some limitations of the GCC, to further improve diagnostic utility. In advance of such a process, validation of these biomarkers will be required before inclusion as additional criteria.
Summary: The GCC are simpler to use than previous consensus criteria, with demonstrated greater sensitivity and, enabling an earlier and more definitive ALS diagnosis, thereby facilitating wider enrolment into clinical trials. Broader implementation of the GCC in clinical trial settings is currently underway, globally.
期刊介绍:
Current Opinion in Neurology is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews; covering key subjects such as cerebrovascular disease, developmental disorders, neuroimaging and demyelinating diseases. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Neurology introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the neurology field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.