"预期会发生":最近被监禁的阿片类药物使用失调患者对释放后用药过量的看法。

IF 4 2区 社会学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Harm Reduction Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1186/s12954-024-01055-1
Pryce S Michener, Elyse Bianchet, Shannon Fox, Elizabeth A Evans, Peter D Friedmann
{"title":"\"预期会发生\":最近被监禁的阿片类药物使用失调患者对释放后用药过量的看法。","authors":"Pryce S Michener, Elyse Bianchet, Shannon Fox, Elizabeth A Evans, Peter D Friedmann","doi":"10.1186/s12954-024-01055-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid-related overdose is the leading cause of death for people recently released from incarceration, however treatment with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) during incarceration can reduce the mortality risk. This study seeks to qualitatively analyze perceptions of post-release overdose risk from the perspectives of people who received MOUD while incarcerated in one of eight Massachusetts jails during 2021-2022 using the Risk Environment Framework to guide analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>N = 38 participants with lived experience of MOUD treatment during incarceration who are now living in the community were interviewed on factors that may contribute to or protect against post-release overdose risk. Themes were identified inductively and deductively using the Risk Environment Framework and its domains, which organizes themes along physical, social, economic, and policy environments on both the micro- and macro- scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The physical risk environment included loss of opioid tolerance during incarceration, polysubstance use, and the toxicity of the regional drug supply as key producers of increased risk for post-release overdose. Social drivers of risk included peer group risk norms-including peer-driven harm reduction practices and interpersonal relationships between drug sellers and buyers-as well as macro-level social determinants of health such as housing insecurity and availability of mental health services. Economic drivers of post-release overdose risk included lack of income generation during incarceration and employment challenges. Participants discussed several aspects of policy that contribute to post-release overdose risk, including availability of harm reduction supplies, public health services, and broader policy around MOUD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The perspectives of people with lived experience are vital to understanding the disproportionate risks of overdose for those recently released from incarceration. Our results highlight the intersectional factors that produce and reproduce the post-release overdose risk environment, providing support for interventions across each domain of the Risk Environment Framework. By capturing perspectives from people with lived experience of OUD and incarceration during this critical period of risk, we can better identify interventions that target and mitigate overdose-related harm in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":12922,"journal":{"name":"Harm Reduction Journal","volume":"21 1","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Expected to happen\\\": perspectives on post-release overdose from recently incarcerated people with opioid use disorder.\",\"authors\":\"Pryce S Michener, Elyse Bianchet, Shannon Fox, Elizabeth A Evans, Peter D Friedmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12954-024-01055-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Opioid-related overdose is the leading cause of death for people recently released from incarceration, however treatment with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) during incarceration can reduce the mortality risk. This study seeks to qualitatively analyze perceptions of post-release overdose risk from the perspectives of people who received MOUD while incarcerated in one of eight Massachusetts jails during 2021-2022 using the Risk Environment Framework to guide analyses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>N = 38 participants with lived experience of MOUD treatment during incarceration who are now living in the community were interviewed on factors that may contribute to or protect against post-release overdose risk. Themes were identified inductively and deductively using the Risk Environment Framework and its domains, which organizes themes along physical, social, economic, and policy environments on both the micro- and macro- scales.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The physical risk environment included loss of opioid tolerance during incarceration, polysubstance use, and the toxicity of the regional drug supply as key producers of increased risk for post-release overdose. Social drivers of risk included peer group risk norms-including peer-driven harm reduction practices and interpersonal relationships between drug sellers and buyers-as well as macro-level social determinants of health such as housing insecurity and availability of mental health services. Economic drivers of post-release overdose risk included lack of income generation during incarceration and employment challenges. Participants discussed several aspects of policy that contribute to post-release overdose risk, including availability of harm reduction supplies, public health services, and broader policy around MOUD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The perspectives of people with lived experience are vital to understanding the disproportionate risks of overdose for those recently released from incarceration. Our results highlight the intersectional factors that produce and reproduce the post-release overdose risk environment, providing support for interventions across each domain of the Risk Environment Framework. By capturing perspectives from people with lived experience of OUD and incarceration during this critical period of risk, we can better identify interventions that target and mitigate overdose-related harm in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harm Reduction Journal\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265078/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harm Reduction Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01055-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harm Reduction Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-024-01055-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与阿片类药物相关的用药过量是新近刑满释放人员的主要死因,但在监禁期间接受阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)药物治疗可降低死亡风险。本研究试图从 2021-2022 年期间在马萨诸塞州八所监狱之一接受阿片类药物使用障碍(MOUD)治疗的人的角度,定性分析他们对释放后用药过量风险的看法,并使用风险环境框架来指导分析:N = 38 名在监禁期间接受过 MOUD 治疗、目前在社区生活的参与者接受了采访,了解可能导致或防止释放后用药过量风险的因素。采用风险环境框架及其领域,根据微观和宏观尺度上的物理、社会、经济和政策环境对主题进行了归纳和演绎:物理风险环境包括监禁期间阿片类药物耐受性的丧失、多种物质的使用以及地区毒品供应的毒性,这些都是导致释放后用药过量风险增加的关键因素。风险的社会驱动因素包括同龄群体风险规范--包括同龄人驱动的减低伤害做法和毒品买卖双方之间的人际关系--以及宏观层面的健康社会决定因素,如住房不安全和心理健康服务的可获得性。释放后用药过量风险的经济驱动因素包括监禁期间缺乏创收和就业挑战。与会者讨论了导致释放后用药过量风险的政策的几个方面,包括减低伤害用品的可用性、公共卫生服务以及围绕 MOUD 的更广泛的政策:有亲身经历者的观点对于了解新近刑满释放人员的用药过量风险至关重要。我们的研究结果强调了产生和重现释放后用药过量风险环境的交叉因素,为风险环境框架各领域的干预措施提供了支持。在这一关键的风险时期,通过捕捉有 OUD 和监禁生活经历的人的观点,我们可以更好地确定针对这一人群的干预措施,减轻用药过量相关的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"Expected to happen": perspectives on post-release overdose from recently incarcerated people with opioid use disorder.

Background: Opioid-related overdose is the leading cause of death for people recently released from incarceration, however treatment with medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) during incarceration can reduce the mortality risk. This study seeks to qualitatively analyze perceptions of post-release overdose risk from the perspectives of people who received MOUD while incarcerated in one of eight Massachusetts jails during 2021-2022 using the Risk Environment Framework to guide analyses.

Methods: N = 38 participants with lived experience of MOUD treatment during incarceration who are now living in the community were interviewed on factors that may contribute to or protect against post-release overdose risk. Themes were identified inductively and deductively using the Risk Environment Framework and its domains, which organizes themes along physical, social, economic, and policy environments on both the micro- and macro- scales.

Results: The physical risk environment included loss of opioid tolerance during incarceration, polysubstance use, and the toxicity of the regional drug supply as key producers of increased risk for post-release overdose. Social drivers of risk included peer group risk norms-including peer-driven harm reduction practices and interpersonal relationships between drug sellers and buyers-as well as macro-level social determinants of health such as housing insecurity and availability of mental health services. Economic drivers of post-release overdose risk included lack of income generation during incarceration and employment challenges. Participants discussed several aspects of policy that contribute to post-release overdose risk, including availability of harm reduction supplies, public health services, and broader policy around MOUD.

Conclusions: The perspectives of people with lived experience are vital to understanding the disproportionate risks of overdose for those recently released from incarceration. Our results highlight the intersectional factors that produce and reproduce the post-release overdose risk environment, providing support for interventions across each domain of the Risk Environment Framework. By capturing perspectives from people with lived experience of OUD and incarceration during this critical period of risk, we can better identify interventions that target and mitigate overdose-related harm in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Harm Reduction Journal
Harm Reduction Journal Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Harm Reduction Journal is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies. We define "harm reduction" as "policies and programs which aim to reduce the health, social, and economic costs of legal and illegal psychoactive drug use without necessarily reducing drug consumption". We are especially interested in studies of the evolving patterns of drug use around the world, their implications for the spread of HIV/AIDS and other blood-borne pathogens.
期刊最新文献
Correction: Implementation of a community-based LC-UV drug checking service: promising preliminary findings on feasibility and validity. Who is the drug user activist?: recounting the conceptualisation of drug user activism in the United Kingdom. Assessment of harm reduction receipt and infectious diseases outcomes in United States Veterans with opioid use disorder and history of injection drug use. Opportunities to enhance retention on medication for opioid use disorder for adolescents and young adults: results from a qualitative study with medical providers in Philadelphia, PA. Joint smoking-vaping prevalence rates among American youth and young adults 2011-2022.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1