髋关节周围异位骨化的 "功能性切除术"--计算机断层扫描(CT)导航引导与传统切除术的比较分析。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS International Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1007/s00264-024-06256-8
Dhanasekaran Soundarrajan, Helawi Tewabe Fanta, Rithika Singh, Palanisami Dhanasekararaja, Natesan Rajkumar, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran
{"title":"髋关节周围异位骨化的 \"功能性切除术\"--计算机断层扫描(CT)导航引导与传统切除术的比较分析。","authors":"Dhanasekaran Soundarrajan, Helawi Tewabe Fanta, Rithika Singh, Palanisami Dhanasekararaja, Natesan Rajkumar, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran","doi":"10.1007/s00264-024-06256-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aim to analyse and compare the efficacy of the excision of HO around the hip with and without CT-guided navigation. We also aim to compare the functional outcome between CT navigation guided versus conventional excision of HO.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2015 to 2022. There were 23 patients (24 hips) in the final cohort. Intraoperative CT navigation guided excision was performed in 7 hips and conventional excision of HO was done in 17 hips. The HO was classified by Brooker's grading in radiographs. CT scan was taken preoperatively in all patients to exactly identify the volume, location and preoperative planning. The functional outcome was analysed according to Harris Hip Score (HHS) and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT) for self-ambulatory patients and improvement in the sitting or nursing care was assessed in patients mobilising with wheelchair or walker support. Any complications or recurrence noted postoperatively and in follow-up were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up was 41.2 months in the CT navigation-guided excision group and 55 months in the conventional excision group. According to Brooker's grading, grade IV was present in 20 hips and grade III in four hips. Twelve patients were self-ambulatory and the other 12 patients were requiring support for mobilisation. There was a significant improvement in the HHS from 21.3 ± 3.7, 18.3 ± 2.5 preoperatively to 75.2 ± 8.3, 72.2 ± 4.3 postoperatively in the CT navigation guided and conventional group respectively (p < 0.001) in the self-ambulatory group. There was one anterior wall and one partial posterior wall fracture in the conventional group. One patient in the conventional group had a deep infection and recurrence. One patient had a superficial infection and another had superficial vein thrombosis in the CT guided excision group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative CT navigation helps to exactly localize the HO and facilitates safe excision. Functional excision of the HO leads to better nursing care and functional outcomes between both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":14450,"journal":{"name":"International Orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of 'functional excision' of heterotopic ossification around the hip - computed tomography (CT) navigation guided versus conventional excision.\",\"authors\":\"Dhanasekaran Soundarrajan, Helawi Tewabe Fanta, Rithika Singh, Palanisami Dhanasekararaja, Natesan Rajkumar, Shanmuganathan Rajasekaran\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00264-024-06256-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We aim to analyse and compare the efficacy of the excision of HO around the hip with and without CT-guided navigation. We also aim to compare the functional outcome between CT navigation guided versus conventional excision of HO.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2015 to 2022. There were 23 patients (24 hips) in the final cohort. Intraoperative CT navigation guided excision was performed in 7 hips and conventional excision of HO was done in 17 hips. The HO was classified by Brooker's grading in radiographs. CT scan was taken preoperatively in all patients to exactly identify the volume, location and preoperative planning. The functional outcome was analysed according to Harris Hip Score (HHS) and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT) for self-ambulatory patients and improvement in the sitting or nursing care was assessed in patients mobilising with wheelchair or walker support. Any complications or recurrence noted postoperatively and in follow-up were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean follow-up was 41.2 months in the CT navigation-guided excision group and 55 months in the conventional excision group. According to Brooker's grading, grade IV was present in 20 hips and grade III in four hips. Twelve patients were self-ambulatory and the other 12 patients were requiring support for mobilisation. There was a significant improvement in the HHS from 21.3 ± 3.7, 18.3 ± 2.5 preoperatively to 75.2 ± 8.3, 72.2 ± 4.3 postoperatively in the CT navigation guided and conventional group respectively (p < 0.001) in the self-ambulatory group. There was one anterior wall and one partial posterior wall fracture in the conventional group. One patient in the conventional group had a deep infection and recurrence. One patient had a superficial infection and another had superficial vein thrombosis in the CT guided excision group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Intraoperative CT navigation helps to exactly localize the HO and facilitates safe excision. Functional excision of the HO leads to better nursing care and functional outcomes between both groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06256-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-024-06256-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们旨在分析和比较在CT导航下和不在CT导航下切除髋关节周围HO的疗效。我们还旨在比较CT导航与传统HO切除术的功能结果:本研究是对2015年至2022年收集的前瞻性数据进行的回顾性分析。最终队列中有23名患者(24个髋关节)。7个髋关节在术中CT导航引导下进行了HO切除术,17个髋关节进行了传统的HO切除术。HO根据X光片上的Brooker分级进行分类。所有患者术前都进行了CT扫描,以准确确定体积、位置和术前计划。根据哈里斯髋关节评分(Harris Hip Score,HHS)和国际髋关节结果工具(International Hip Outcome Tool,iHOT)分析了自主活动患者的功能结果,并评估了在轮椅或助行器支持下活动的患者在坐姿或护理方面的改善情况。记录术后和随访中发现的任何并发症或复发情况:CT 导航引导下切除术组的平均随访时间为 41.2 个月,传统切除术组为 55 个月。根据布鲁克分级,20 个髋关节为 IV 级,4 个为 III 级。12名患者可以自行行走,另外12名患者则需要辅助活动。CT 导航引导组和传统组的 HHS 分别从术前的 21.3 ± 3.7、18.3 ± 2.5 显著提高到术后的 75.2 ± 8.3、72.2 ± 4.3(P 结论:术中 CT 导航有助于准确定位髋关节的位置:术中 CT 导航有助于准确定位 HO,并促进安全切除。功能性切除 HO 使两组患者获得更好的护理和功能效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative analysis of 'functional excision' of heterotopic ossification around the hip - computed tomography (CT) navigation guided versus conventional excision.

Purpose: We aim to analyse and compare the efficacy of the excision of HO around the hip with and without CT-guided navigation. We also aim to compare the functional outcome between CT navigation guided versus conventional excision of HO.

Patients and methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 2015 to 2022. There were 23 patients (24 hips) in the final cohort. Intraoperative CT navigation guided excision was performed in 7 hips and conventional excision of HO was done in 17 hips. The HO was classified by Brooker's grading in radiographs. CT scan was taken preoperatively in all patients to exactly identify the volume, location and preoperative planning. The functional outcome was analysed according to Harris Hip Score (HHS) and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT) for self-ambulatory patients and improvement in the sitting or nursing care was assessed in patients mobilising with wheelchair or walker support. Any complications or recurrence noted postoperatively and in follow-up were recorded.

Results: The mean follow-up was 41.2 months in the CT navigation-guided excision group and 55 months in the conventional excision group. According to Brooker's grading, grade IV was present in 20 hips and grade III in four hips. Twelve patients were self-ambulatory and the other 12 patients were requiring support for mobilisation. There was a significant improvement in the HHS from 21.3 ± 3.7, 18.3 ± 2.5 preoperatively to 75.2 ± 8.3, 72.2 ± 4.3 postoperatively in the CT navigation guided and conventional group respectively (p < 0.001) in the self-ambulatory group. There was one anterior wall and one partial posterior wall fracture in the conventional group. One patient in the conventional group had a deep infection and recurrence. One patient had a superficial infection and another had superficial vein thrombosis in the CT guided excision group.

Conclusion: Intraoperative CT navigation helps to exactly localize the HO and facilitates safe excision. Functional excision of the HO leads to better nursing care and functional outcomes between both groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Orthopaedics
International Orthopaedics 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
360
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: International Orthopaedics, the Official Journal of the Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie (SICOT) , publishes original papers from all over the world. The articles deal with clinical orthopaedic surgery or basic research directly connected with orthopaedic surgery. International Orthopaedics will also link all the members of SICOT by means of an insert that will be concerned with SICOT matters. Finally, it is expected that news and information regarding all aspects of orthopaedic surgery, including meetings, panels, instructional courses, etc. will be brought to the attention of the readers. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been approved by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the "Principles of laboratory animal care" (NIH publication No. 85-23, revised 1985) were followed, as well as specific national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals) where applicable. The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfil the above-mentioned requirements.
期刊最新文献
Medium- to long-term clinical efficacy of total hip arthroplasty with structural bone grafting for dysplasia of the hip. Clinical outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasty in non-syphilitic neuroarthropathy of the knee. "Is every revision the same?" definition of complexity in knee revision surgery. Is the occurrence of extra-articular calcaneal fractures of the joint depression type related to osteoporosis and aging? Innovative approaches in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: comparison of pulsed radiofrequency ablation and surgical intervention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1