三维骨形态是内侧腓肠肌切除术后综合征的风险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 2 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-07-21 DOI:10.1002/jeo2.12090
Jonas Grammens, Annemieke Van Haver, Femke Danckaers, Kristien Vuylsteke, Jan Sijbers, Lotem Mahluf, Peter Angele, Elizaveta Kon, Peter Verdonk, MEFISTO WP1 Group
{"title":"三维骨形态是内侧腓肠肌切除术后综合征的风险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Jonas Grammens,&nbsp;Annemieke Van Haver,&nbsp;Femke Danckaers,&nbsp;Kristien Vuylsteke,&nbsp;Jan Sijbers,&nbsp;Lotem Mahluf,&nbsp;Peter Angele,&nbsp;Elizaveta Kon,&nbsp;Peter Verdonk,&nbsp;MEFISTO WP1 Group","doi":"10.1002/jeo2.12090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The study aims to identify differences in tibiofemoral joint morphology between responders (R group, no pain) to arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy (APMM) versus medial postmeniscectomy syndrome patients (MPMS group, recurrent pain at 2 years postmeniscectomy) in a clinically neutrally aligned patient population. The second aim was to build a morphology-based predictive algorithm for response to treatment (RTT) in APMM.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Two patient groups were identified from a large multicentre database of meniscectomy patients at 2 years of follow-up: the R group included 120 patients with a KOOS pain score &gt; 75, and the MPMS group included 120 patients with a KOOS pain score ≤ 75. Statistical shape models (SSMs) of distal femur, proximal tibia and tibiofemoral joint were used to compare knee morphology. Finally, a predictive model was developed to predict RTT, with the SSM-derived morphologic variables as predictors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>No differences were found between the R and MPMS groups for patient age, sex, height, weight or cartilage status. Knees in the MPMS group were significantly smaller, had a wider femoral notch and a smaller medial femoral condyle. A morphology-based predictive model was able to predict MPMS at 2 years follow-up with a sensitivity of 74.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 74.4%–75.4%) and a specificity of 81.0% (95% CI: 80.6%–81.5%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A smaller tibiofemoral joint, a wider intercondylar notch and smaller medial femoral condyle were observed shape variations related to medial postmeniscectomy syndrome. These promising results are a first step towards a knee morphology-based clinical decision support tool for meniscus treatment.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study Design</h3>\n \n <p>Case–control study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\n \n <p>Level IIIb.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11260280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three-dimensional bone morphology is a risk factor for medial postmeniscectomy syndrome: A retrospective cohort study\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Grammens,&nbsp;Annemieke Van Haver,&nbsp;Femke Danckaers,&nbsp;Kristien Vuylsteke,&nbsp;Jan Sijbers,&nbsp;Lotem Mahluf,&nbsp;Peter Angele,&nbsp;Elizaveta Kon,&nbsp;Peter Verdonk,&nbsp;MEFISTO WP1 Group\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jeo2.12090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>The study aims to identify differences in tibiofemoral joint morphology between responders (R group, no pain) to arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy (APMM) versus medial postmeniscectomy syndrome patients (MPMS group, recurrent pain at 2 years postmeniscectomy) in a clinically neutrally aligned patient population. The second aim was to build a morphology-based predictive algorithm for response to treatment (RTT) in APMM.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Two patient groups were identified from a large multicentre database of meniscectomy patients at 2 years of follow-up: the R group included 120 patients with a KOOS pain score &gt; 75, and the MPMS group included 120 patients with a KOOS pain score ≤ 75. Statistical shape models (SSMs) of distal femur, proximal tibia and tibiofemoral joint were used to compare knee morphology. Finally, a predictive model was developed to predict RTT, with the SSM-derived morphologic variables as predictors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>No differences were found between the R and MPMS groups for patient age, sex, height, weight or cartilage status. Knees in the MPMS group were significantly smaller, had a wider femoral notch and a smaller medial femoral condyle. A morphology-based predictive model was able to predict MPMS at 2 years follow-up with a sensitivity of 74.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 74.4%–75.4%) and a specificity of 81.0% (95% CI: 80.6%–81.5%).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>A smaller tibiofemoral joint, a wider intercondylar notch and smaller medial femoral condyle were observed shape variations related to medial postmeniscectomy syndrome. These promising results are a first step towards a knee morphology-based clinical decision support tool for meniscus treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Study Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Case–control study.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Level of Evidence</h3>\\n \\n <p>Level IIIb.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36909,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"11 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11260280/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.12090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jeo2.12090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:该研究旨在确定关节镜下内侧半月板部分切除术(APMM)反应者(R组,无疼痛)与内侧半月板切除术后综合征患者(MPMS组,半月板切除术后2年复发疼痛)之间的胫股关节形态学差异。第二个目的是建立基于形态学的 APMM 治疗反应(RTT)预测算法:从随访两年的大型多中心半月板切除术患者数据库中确定了两组患者:R组包括120名KOOS疼痛评分大于75分的患者,MPMS组包括120名KOOS疼痛评分小于75分的患者。股骨远端、胫骨近端和胫股关节的统计形状模型(SSM)用于比较膝关节形态。最后,以 SSM 得出的形态变量为预测因子,建立了一个预测模型来预测 RTT:结果:R组和MPMS组在患者年龄、性别、身高、体重或软骨状况方面均无差异。MPMS组的膝关节明显较小,股骨凹槽较宽,股骨内侧髁较小。基于形态学的预测模型能够预测随访两年的 MPMS,灵敏度为 74.9%(95% 置信区间 [CI]:74.4%-75.4%),特异度为 81.0%(95% 置信区间:80.6%-81.5%):结论:胫股关节变小、髁间凹槽变宽、股骨内侧髁变小是与内侧胫骨切除术后综合征有关的形状变化。这些令人鼓舞的结果是迈向基于膝关节形态的半月板治疗临床决策支持工具的第一步:研究设计:病例对照研究:证据等级:IIIb级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Three-dimensional bone morphology is a risk factor for medial postmeniscectomy syndrome: A retrospective cohort study

Purpose

The study aims to identify differences in tibiofemoral joint morphology between responders (R group, no pain) to arthroscopic partial medial meniscectomy (APMM) versus medial postmeniscectomy syndrome patients (MPMS group, recurrent pain at 2 years postmeniscectomy) in a clinically neutrally aligned patient population. The second aim was to build a morphology-based predictive algorithm for response to treatment (RTT) in APMM.

Methods

Two patient groups were identified from a large multicentre database of meniscectomy patients at 2 years of follow-up: the R group included 120 patients with a KOOS pain score > 75, and the MPMS group included 120 patients with a KOOS pain score ≤ 75. Statistical shape models (SSMs) of distal femur, proximal tibia and tibiofemoral joint were used to compare knee morphology. Finally, a predictive model was developed to predict RTT, with the SSM-derived morphologic variables as predictors.

Results

No differences were found between the R and MPMS groups for patient age, sex, height, weight or cartilage status. Knees in the MPMS group were significantly smaller, had a wider femoral notch and a smaller medial femoral condyle. A morphology-based predictive model was able to predict MPMS at 2 years follow-up with a sensitivity of 74.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 74.4%–75.4%) and a specificity of 81.0% (95% CI: 80.6%–81.5%).

Conclusion

A smaller tibiofemoral joint, a wider intercondylar notch and smaller medial femoral condyle were observed shape variations related to medial postmeniscectomy syndrome. These promising results are a first step towards a knee morphology-based clinical decision support tool for meniscus treatment.

Study Design

Case–control study.

Level of Evidence

Level IIIb.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation to Spanish of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury Scale (SP ACL‑RSI): Measurement properties and responsiveness in a multisport sample Machine learning in knee injury sequelae detection: Unravelling the role of psychological factors and preventing long-term sequelae Anteroposterior axis of the tibia for kinematic aligned total knee arthroplasty Radiographic acceptable zone of endobutton placement in ACL reconstruction: A prospective study Does free tendon length influence the injury risk of the Achilles tendon? A finite element study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1