基于审计的纠正和预防措施,减少单个血液中心的血液成分浪费:质量改进研究。

IF 0.6 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Asian Journal of Transfusion Science Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-11 DOI:10.4103/ajts.ajts_131_22
John Gnanaraj, Rajendra Kulkarni, Dibyajyoti Sahoo, Abhishekh Basavarajegowda
{"title":"基于审计的纠正和预防措施,减少单个血液中心的血液成分浪费:质量改进研究。","authors":"John Gnanaraj, Rajendra Kulkarni, Dibyajyoti Sahoo, Abhishekh Basavarajegowda","doi":"10.4103/ajts.ajts_131_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The rate of discarded blood components or \"wastage rate\" reflects on the whole process, preparation, and production of blood and its quality control. It is the ratio of blood and blood components discarded to the total number of collections. The discard or unusability of blood products are many, and the ones that can be monitored and regarded as indicators to be improvised on are QC failure rate, transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI) positivity, and component discards (other than TTI), including those that caused transfusion reactions. These were studied over four intervention cycles to see if they could be improved.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a clinical audit and quality improvement study. The clinical audit was conducted over four cycles over 16 months. Each cycle included three stages wherein the data required for calculating those key performance indicators (KPIs) of the blood center were studied and analyzed, and causes for the poorly performing ones were identified; a corrective plan was drawn and implemented, followed by data collection and interpretation of the same in the next cycle for improvement. The data were compiled using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using SPSS version 19 (IBM Corporation, New York, USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall discard rates due to all cumulative causes mentioned were at about 5% at the start of the first cycle. The various factors comprising preparatory, preparation, and the management of inventory and issue were analyzed, and corrective interventions were performed in every cycle. The discard rates were reduced to about 3% by the end of the four cycles. The difference was statistically significant, with a <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of Corrective and preventive action measures can rectify the deviations in KPIs. The blood center director, staff, and doctors should be responsible for maintaining and continuously improving the quality indicators.</p>","PeriodicalId":42296,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","volume":"18 1","pages":"27-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11259350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Audit-based corrective and preventive actions to reduce wastage of blood components at a single blood center: A quality improvement study.\",\"authors\":\"John Gnanaraj, Rajendra Kulkarni, Dibyajyoti Sahoo, Abhishekh Basavarajegowda\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ajts.ajts_131_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The rate of discarded blood components or \\\"wastage rate\\\" reflects on the whole process, preparation, and production of blood and its quality control. It is the ratio of blood and blood components discarded to the total number of collections. The discard or unusability of blood products are many, and the ones that can be monitored and regarded as indicators to be improvised on are QC failure rate, transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI) positivity, and component discards (other than TTI), including those that caused transfusion reactions. These were studied over four intervention cycles to see if they could be improved.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This was a clinical audit and quality improvement study. The clinical audit was conducted over four cycles over 16 months. Each cycle included three stages wherein the data required for calculating those key performance indicators (KPIs) of the blood center were studied and analyzed, and causes for the poorly performing ones were identified; a corrective plan was drawn and implemented, followed by data collection and interpretation of the same in the next cycle for improvement. The data were compiled using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using SPSS version 19 (IBM Corporation, New York, USA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall discard rates due to all cumulative causes mentioned were at about 5% at the start of the first cycle. The various factors comprising preparatory, preparation, and the management of inventory and issue were analyzed, and corrective interventions were performed in every cycle. The discard rates were reduced to about 3% by the end of the four cycles. The difference was statistically significant, with a <i>P</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of Corrective and preventive action measures can rectify the deviations in KPIs. The blood center director, staff, and doctors should be responsible for maintaining and continuously improving the quality indicators.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42296,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"27-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11259350/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_131_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/5/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Transfusion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajts.ajts_131_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言血液成分的废弃率或 "损耗率 "反映了血液的整个制备和生产过程及其质量控制。它是指废弃的血液和血液成分与总采集量之比。血液制品废弃或无法使用的情况很多,可以监测并作为改进指标的有:质控失败率、输血传播感染(TTI)阳性率、成分废弃率(TTI 除外),包括引起输血反应的成分废弃率。在四个干预周期内对这些问题进行了研究,以确定是否可以改进:这是一项临床审核和质量改进研究。临床审核分为四个周期,历时 16 个月。每个周期包括三个阶段:研究和分析计算血液中心关键绩效指标(KPI)所需的数据,找出绩效不佳的原因;制定和实施纠正计划,然后在下一个周期收集数据并进行解释,以求改进。数据使用 Microsoft Excel 电子表格编制,并使用 SPSS 19 版(IBM 公司,美国纽约)进行分析:结果:在第一个周期开始时,由于上述所有累积原因造成的总体废弃率约为 5%。分析了包括准备、筹备以及库存和发放管理在内的各种因素,并在每个周期采取了纠正措施。在四个周期结束时,丢弃率降至约 3%。差异具有统计学意义,P < 0.05:实施纠正和预防措施可以纠正关键绩效指标的偏差。血液中心主任、员工和医生应负责维护并持续改进质量指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Audit-based corrective and preventive actions to reduce wastage of blood components at a single blood center: A quality improvement study.

Introduction: The rate of discarded blood components or "wastage rate" reflects on the whole process, preparation, and production of blood and its quality control. It is the ratio of blood and blood components discarded to the total number of collections. The discard or unusability of blood products are many, and the ones that can be monitored and regarded as indicators to be improvised on are QC failure rate, transfusion-transmitted infection (TTI) positivity, and component discards (other than TTI), including those that caused transfusion reactions. These were studied over four intervention cycles to see if they could be improved.

Materials and methods: This was a clinical audit and quality improvement study. The clinical audit was conducted over four cycles over 16 months. Each cycle included three stages wherein the data required for calculating those key performance indicators (KPIs) of the blood center were studied and analyzed, and causes for the poorly performing ones were identified; a corrective plan was drawn and implemented, followed by data collection and interpretation of the same in the next cycle for improvement. The data were compiled using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet and analyzed using SPSS version 19 (IBM Corporation, New York, USA).

Results: The overall discard rates due to all cumulative causes mentioned were at about 5% at the start of the first cycle. The various factors comprising preparatory, preparation, and the management of inventory and issue were analyzed, and corrective interventions were performed in every cycle. The discard rates were reduced to about 3% by the end of the four cycles. The difference was statistically significant, with a P < 0.05.

Conclusion: The implementation of Corrective and preventive action measures can rectify the deviations in KPIs. The blood center director, staff, and doctors should be responsible for maintaining and continuously improving the quality indicators.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
44 weeks
期刊最新文献
A method for selecting P antigen-negative red cell units for patients with paroxysmal cold hemoglobinuria. A review of issues and challenges of implementation of patient blood management. A study on beneficial impact of the use of medium-molecular-weight hydroxyethyl starch in granulocyte apheresis using continuous-flow cell separator Spectra Optia: A retrospective single-center study at a tertiary care oncology center. Aweak phenotype associated with novel ABO*A allele variant c.106delinsGG. Antioxidative effects of α-tocopherol on stored human red blood cell units.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1