Effectiveness of Prolonged Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Radical Cystectomy: Preliminary Analysis of the MACS Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Standard 24-hour antibiotic prophylaxis is widely employed to minimize the risk of infection complications within 30 days following radical cystectomy. However, a considerable variety of protocols and drug combinations don’t prevent a high complication rate, ranging from 37 to 67%. This paper presents the interim analysis of the MACS clinical trial, comparing antibiotic prophylaxis regimens by duration.

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the rate of infection complications within 30 days following radical cystectomy by comparing standard 24-hour antibiotic prophylaxis (Group A) with a prolonged 120-hour regimen (Group B).

METHODS:

Patients were randomized in a 1 : 1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the evaluation of the frequency of infection complications. The secondary endpoints were the rate of re-administrating antibiotics and the dynamics of the inflammation biomarker.

RESULTS:

A total of 78 patients (85.0% of the sample size) were enrolled (Group A: 40 and Group B: 38). The baseline and perioperative features were balanced between groups. The overall complication rate was higher in Group A (65.0% vs. 41.1%, p = 0.043). The infection complication rate was 2.7 times higher in the standard antibiotic prophylaxis group: 37.5% compared to 18.4% cases in Group B (p = 0.041), and upper urinary tract infection was more frequent in Group A (22.5% vs. 2.6%). The prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis reduced the overall frequency of infection complications compared with standard 24-hour prophylaxis (RR = 0.12; 95% CI 0.02–0.88; p = 0.037).

CONCLUSIONS:

In this interim analysis, the administration of prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis over 120 hours appears to be safe and feasible, demonstrating a reduction in the total number of complications, particularly infection complications.