揭示秋葵基因型对叶蝉 Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida 的抗性机制

IF 1.5 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Phytoparasitica Pub Date : 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1007/s12600-024-01180-4
J. N. Prithiva, N. Ganapathy, N. Muthukrishnan, U. Pirithiraj, C. N. Chandrasekhar, S. Mohankumar, R. Rajesh
{"title":"揭示秋葵基因型对叶蝉 Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida 的抗性机制","authors":"J. N. Prithiva, N. Ganapathy, N. Muthukrishnan, U. Pirithiraj, C. N. Chandrasekhar, S. Mohankumar, R. Rajesh","doi":"10.1007/s12600-024-01180-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Amrasca biguttula biguttula</i> Ishida is the major biotic constraint in okra cultivation that cause considerable economic loss. Screening of okra (<i>Abelmoschus esculentus</i>) genotypes is important to develop leafhopper-resistant high-yielding cultivars for improving crop yield. To categorize leafhopper-resistant okra genotypes, we used a comprehensive collection of morphological and biochemical parameters with multivariate analysis in this study. Plant morphological and biochemical parameters were estimated by collection of leaves from different okra genotypes with three replicates during peak leafhopper infestation period and assay were performed based on specific standard protocols. Completely randomized block design was deployed and significant variations in plant morphometrics, biochemicals, and leafhopper population were recorded from each genotype screened. In the present study the morphological parameter viz<i>.,</i> the shortest plant height was observed in resistant genotype AE 23 (17.21 cm) and the tallest plant height was recorded in the susceptible genotype AE 26 (63.22 cm) followed by Pusa Sawani (63.07 cm). The maximum leaf area of 132.24 cm<sup>2</sup> was recorded in AE 15 genotype. Biochemical data reveals that, protein content was highest in susceptible genotype AE26 (11.01 mg/g), followed by Pusa Sawani (10.72 mg/g), and the lowest in the resistant genotype AE65 (4.72 mg/g) followed by AE27 (5.54 mg/g). While phenol, OD phenol, surface wax content were maximum in identified moderately resistant genotypes. The Kaiser Criterion or eigenvalue is greater than one for the first four principal components with the cumulative percentage of variance of 78.48 percent. Principal component analysis simplified the understanding of the interactions among leafhopper and biophysical and biochemical characteristics. The genotypes AE65, AE23, AE 27, No.315, and AE4 expressed resistance in terms of higher total phenol, ortho dihydroxy phenols, tissue toughness, and surface wax contents. Our visual observations on the growth and development of okra genotypes under leafhopper pressure were represented by principal component analysis which makes it reliable. Therefore, the identified jassid-resistant okra genotypes could be further utilized as a source of appropriate donor parents in the breeding of leafhopper-resistant okra varieties.</p>","PeriodicalId":20220,"journal":{"name":"Phytoparasitica","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unveiling mechanisms of resistance for leafhopper, Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida in okra genotypes\",\"authors\":\"J. N. Prithiva, N. Ganapathy, N. Muthukrishnan, U. Pirithiraj, C. N. Chandrasekhar, S. Mohankumar, R. Rajesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12600-024-01180-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>Amrasca biguttula biguttula</i> Ishida is the major biotic constraint in okra cultivation that cause considerable economic loss. Screening of okra (<i>Abelmoschus esculentus</i>) genotypes is important to develop leafhopper-resistant high-yielding cultivars for improving crop yield. To categorize leafhopper-resistant okra genotypes, we used a comprehensive collection of morphological and biochemical parameters with multivariate analysis in this study. Plant morphological and biochemical parameters were estimated by collection of leaves from different okra genotypes with three replicates during peak leafhopper infestation period and assay were performed based on specific standard protocols. Completely randomized block design was deployed and significant variations in plant morphometrics, biochemicals, and leafhopper population were recorded from each genotype screened. In the present study the morphological parameter viz<i>.,</i> the shortest plant height was observed in resistant genotype AE 23 (17.21 cm) and the tallest plant height was recorded in the susceptible genotype AE 26 (63.22 cm) followed by Pusa Sawani (63.07 cm). The maximum leaf area of 132.24 cm<sup>2</sup> was recorded in AE 15 genotype. Biochemical data reveals that, protein content was highest in susceptible genotype AE26 (11.01 mg/g), followed by Pusa Sawani (10.72 mg/g), and the lowest in the resistant genotype AE65 (4.72 mg/g) followed by AE27 (5.54 mg/g). While phenol, OD phenol, surface wax content were maximum in identified moderately resistant genotypes. The Kaiser Criterion or eigenvalue is greater than one for the first four principal components with the cumulative percentage of variance of 78.48 percent. Principal component analysis simplified the understanding of the interactions among leafhopper and biophysical and biochemical characteristics. The genotypes AE65, AE23, AE 27, No.315, and AE4 expressed resistance in terms of higher total phenol, ortho dihydroxy phenols, tissue toughness, and surface wax contents. Our visual observations on the growth and development of okra genotypes under leafhopper pressure were represented by principal component analysis which makes it reliable. Therefore, the identified jassid-resistant okra genotypes could be further utilized as a source of appropriate donor parents in the breeding of leafhopper-resistant okra varieties.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phytoparasitica\",\"volume\":\"78 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phytoparasitica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-024-01180-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytoparasitica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-024-01180-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

石田大叶蝉(Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida)是秋葵种植过程中的主要生物制约因素,造成了巨大的经济损失。筛选秋葵(Abelmoschus esculentus)基因型对于培育抗叶蝉高产栽培品种以提高作物产量非常重要。为了对抗叶蝉的秋葵基因型进行分类,我们在本研究中使用了全面的形态和生化参数集合,并进行了多元分析。研究人员在叶蝉肆虐高峰期采集了不同秋葵基因型的叶片,进行了三次重复,并根据特定的标准方案对植物形态和生化参数进行了评估。采用完全随机区组设计,对筛选出的每种基因型的植物形态计量学、生化指标和叶蝉数量进行了显著变化记录。在本研究中,抗性基因型 AE 23 的植株高度最矮(17.21 厘米),易感基因型 AE 26 的植株高度最高(63.22 厘米),其次是 Pusa Sawani(63.07 厘米)。AE 15 基因型的叶面积最大,为 132.24 平方厘米。生化数据显示,蛋白质含量最高的是易感基因型 AE26(11.01 毫克/克),其次是 Pusa Sawani(10.72 毫克/克),最低的是抗性基因型 AE65(4.72 毫克/克),其次是 AE27(5.54 毫克/克)。苯酚、OD 苯酚和表面蜡含量在已确定的中度抗性基因型中最高。前四个主成分的 Kaiser 标准或特征值大于 1,累计方差百分比为 78.48%。主成分分析简化了对叶蝉与生物物理和生物化学特征之间相互作用的理解。基因型 AE65、AE23、AE 27、No.315 和 AE4 的抗性表现为总酚、正二羟基酚、组织韧性和表面蜡含量较高。我们对叶蝉胁迫下秋葵基因型生长发育的直观观察是通过主成分分析来体现的,这一点非常可靠。因此,所鉴定的抗叶蝉黄秋葵基因型可进一步用作培育抗叶蝉黄秋葵品种的合适供体亲本来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unveiling mechanisms of resistance for leafhopper, Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida in okra genotypes

Amrasca biguttula biguttula Ishida is the major biotic constraint in okra cultivation that cause considerable economic loss. Screening of okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) genotypes is important to develop leafhopper-resistant high-yielding cultivars for improving crop yield. To categorize leafhopper-resistant okra genotypes, we used a comprehensive collection of morphological and biochemical parameters with multivariate analysis in this study. Plant morphological and biochemical parameters were estimated by collection of leaves from different okra genotypes with three replicates during peak leafhopper infestation period and assay were performed based on specific standard protocols. Completely randomized block design was deployed and significant variations in plant morphometrics, biochemicals, and leafhopper population were recorded from each genotype screened. In the present study the morphological parameter viz., the shortest plant height was observed in resistant genotype AE 23 (17.21 cm) and the tallest plant height was recorded in the susceptible genotype AE 26 (63.22 cm) followed by Pusa Sawani (63.07 cm). The maximum leaf area of 132.24 cm2 was recorded in AE 15 genotype. Biochemical data reveals that, protein content was highest in susceptible genotype AE26 (11.01 mg/g), followed by Pusa Sawani (10.72 mg/g), and the lowest in the resistant genotype AE65 (4.72 mg/g) followed by AE27 (5.54 mg/g). While phenol, OD phenol, surface wax content were maximum in identified moderately resistant genotypes. The Kaiser Criterion or eigenvalue is greater than one for the first four principal components with the cumulative percentage of variance of 78.48 percent. Principal component analysis simplified the understanding of the interactions among leafhopper and biophysical and biochemical characteristics. The genotypes AE65, AE23, AE 27, No.315, and AE4 expressed resistance in terms of higher total phenol, ortho dihydroxy phenols, tissue toughness, and surface wax contents. Our visual observations on the growth and development of okra genotypes under leafhopper pressure were represented by principal component analysis which makes it reliable. Therefore, the identified jassid-resistant okra genotypes could be further utilized as a source of appropriate donor parents in the breeding of leafhopper-resistant okra varieties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Phytoparasitica
Phytoparasitica 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Phytoparasitica is an international journal on Plant Protection, that publishes original research contributions on the biological, chemical and molecular aspects of Entomology, Plant Pathology, Virology, Nematology, and Weed Sciences, which strives to improve scientific knowledge and technology for IPM, in forest and agroecosystems. Phytoparasitica emphasizes new insights into plant disease and pest etiology, epidemiology, host-parasite/pest biochemistry and cell biology, ecology and population biology, host genetics and resistance, disease vector biology, plant stress and biotic disorders, postharvest pathology and mycotoxins. Research can cover aspects related to the nature of plant diseases, pests and weeds, the causal agents, their spread, the losses they cause, crop loss assessment, and novel tactics and approaches for their management.
期刊最新文献
Bioassay tray for assessing susceptibility of Liriomyza sativae Blanchard (Diptera: Agromyzidae) to reduced-risk insecticides and resistance monitoring in Brazil Molecular identification of thrips species in Brazilian agroecosystems Inoculative releases of Telenomus podisi Ashmead (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae) for management of the stink bug complex in soybean crops Oviposition behaviour and larval attraction of the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to different maize plant varieties for pest management in Nigeria Molecular identification and preliminary diversity analysis of Astylus atromaculatus Blanchard, 1843 (Coleoptera: Melyridae) based on mitochondrial COI sequences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1