学生为何离开自己的专业?元人类学

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of College Student Retention-Research Theory & Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-21 DOI:10.1177/15210251241264746
Rachael Ann Cody
{"title":"学生为何离开自己的专业?元人类学","authors":"Rachael Ann Cody","doi":"10.1177/15210251241264746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to examine and integrate the findings of several qualitative studies on student attrition in higher education to identify the factors that influenced study participants’ decisions to switch out or drop out of their initially chosen majors. This meta-ethnography included nine qualitative studies that were analyzed using Noblit and Hare's (1988) seven-step approach to the synthesis of qualitative research. Findings indicate that study participants shared feelings of being underprepared for the academic challenges associated with their chosen majors, that they experienced a lack of support throughout their experience as students in their programs, and that the combination of the lack of preparation and lack of support led students to feel overwhelmed. The findings suggest that students who choose to leave their majors may need additional support from those in their academic areas of interest, as well as from academic advisors.","PeriodicalId":47066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of College Student Retention-Research Theory & Practice","volume":"130 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Students Leave Their Majors: A Meta-Ethnography\",\"authors\":\"Rachael Ann Cody\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15210251241264746\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this research is to examine and integrate the findings of several qualitative studies on student attrition in higher education to identify the factors that influenced study participants’ decisions to switch out or drop out of their initially chosen majors. This meta-ethnography included nine qualitative studies that were analyzed using Noblit and Hare's (1988) seven-step approach to the synthesis of qualitative research. Findings indicate that study participants shared feelings of being underprepared for the academic challenges associated with their chosen majors, that they experienced a lack of support throughout their experience as students in their programs, and that the combination of the lack of preparation and lack of support led students to feel overwhelmed. The findings suggest that students who choose to leave their majors may need additional support from those in their academic areas of interest, as well as from academic advisors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47066,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of College Student Retention-Research Theory & Practice\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of College Student Retention-Research Theory & Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251241264746\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of College Student Retention-Research Theory & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15210251241264746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是检查并整合几项关于高等教育中学生自然减员的定性研究结果,以确定影响研究参与者决定从最初选择的专业转出或退学的因素。本元民族志包括九项定性研究,采用 Noblit 和 Hare(1988 年)的定性研究综合七步法对这些研究进行了分析。研究结果表明,研究参与者都认为自己对所选专业相关的学术挑战准备不足,在整个学习过程中缺乏支持,缺乏准备和缺乏支持共同导致学生感到不知所措。研究结果表明,选择离开所学专业的学生可能需要从他们感兴趣的学术领域以及学术顾问那里获得额外的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why Students Leave Their Majors: A Meta-Ethnography
The purpose of this research is to examine and integrate the findings of several qualitative studies on student attrition in higher education to identify the factors that influenced study participants’ decisions to switch out or drop out of their initially chosen majors. This meta-ethnography included nine qualitative studies that were analyzed using Noblit and Hare's (1988) seven-step approach to the synthesis of qualitative research. Findings indicate that study participants shared feelings of being underprepared for the academic challenges associated with their chosen majors, that they experienced a lack of support throughout their experience as students in their programs, and that the combination of the lack of preparation and lack of support led students to feel overwhelmed. The findings suggest that students who choose to leave their majors may need additional support from those in their academic areas of interest, as well as from academic advisors.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
42
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Cultivating trauma-informed practices in student affairs by Shalka, T. R. Book Review: The Impact of a sense of belonging in college: Implications for student persistence, retention and success by Bentrim, E. M., and Henning, G. W. University Dropout and Transfer Intention, What Is the Influence of Resilience and Social Adaptation on the Two Types of Dropout? The Impact of a Peer Mentoring Program on Undergraduate Graduation Rates: A Matched Control Group Design Early Indicators of Study Delay and Dropout: Test Anxiety and its Link to Exam Participation and Performance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1