关于招聘和选拔中的人工智能的系统文献综述:道德问题

IF 3.3 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Personnel Review Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.1108/pr-03-2023-0257
Martina Mori, Sara Sassetti, Vincenzo Cavaliere, Mariacristina Bonti
{"title":"关于招聘和选拔中的人工智能的系统文献综述:道德问题","authors":"Martina Mori, Sara Sassetti, Vincenzo Cavaliere, Mariacristina Bonti","doi":"10.1108/pr-03-2023-0257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Starting from the relevance of ethics to the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the context of employee recruitment and selection (R&amp;S), in this article, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the literature in light of the main ethical theories (utilitarian theories, theories of justice, and theories of rights) to identify a future research agenda and practical implications.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>On the basis of the best-quality and most influential journals, we conducted a systematic review of 120 articles from two databases (Web of Science and Scopus) to provide descriptive results and adopt a framework for deductive classification of the main topics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Inspired by the three ethical theories, we identified three thematic lines of enquiry for the debate on AI in R&amp;S: (1) the utilitarian view: the efficient optimisation of R&amp;S through AI; (2) the justice view: the perceptions of justice and fairness related to AI techniques; and (3) the rights view: the respect for legal and human rights requirements when AI is applied.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This article provides a detailed assessment of the adoption of AI in the R&amp;S process from the standpoint of traditional ethics theories and offers an integrative theoretical framework for future research on AI in the broader field of HRM.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48148,"journal":{"name":"Personnel Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic literature review on artificial intelligence in recruiting and selection: a matter of ethics\",\"authors\":\"Martina Mori, Sara Sassetti, Vincenzo Cavaliere, Mariacristina Bonti\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/pr-03-2023-0257\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Starting from the relevance of ethics to the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the context of employee recruitment and selection (R&amp;S), in this article, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the literature in light of the main ethical theories (utilitarian theories, theories of justice, and theories of rights) to identify a future research agenda and practical implications.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>On the basis of the best-quality and most influential journals, we conducted a systematic review of 120 articles from two databases (Web of Science and Scopus) to provide descriptive results and adopt a framework for deductive classification of the main topics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Inspired by the three ethical theories, we identified three thematic lines of enquiry for the debate on AI in R&amp;S: (1) the utilitarian view: the efficient optimisation of R&amp;S through AI; (2) the justice view: the perceptions of justice and fairness related to AI techniques; and (3) the rights view: the respect for legal and human rights requirements when AI is applied.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This article provides a detailed assessment of the adoption of AI in the R&amp;S process from the standpoint of traditional ethics theories and offers an integrative theoretical framework for future research on AI in the broader field of HRM.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":48148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personnel Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personnel Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-03-2023-0257\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personnel Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-03-2023-0257","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本文从伦理学与人工智能(AI)在员工招聘和选拔(R&S)中的应用的相关性出发,旨在根据主要伦理学理论(功利主义理论、正义理论和权利理论)对文献进行全面综述,以确定未来的研究议程和实际意义。设计/方法/途径在质量最好、最有影响力的期刊的基础上,我们对两个数据库(Web of Science 和 Scopus)中的 120 篇文章进行了系统综述,以提供描述性结果,并采用一个框架对主要议题进行演绎分类。研究结果在三种伦理理论的启发下,我们确定了有关研发领域人工智能的讨论的三条主题线索:(1) 功利主义观点:通过人工智能实现研发领域的高效优化;(2) 正义观点:与人工智能技术相关的正义和公平观念;(3) 权利观点:在应用人工智能时尊重法律和人权要求。原创性/价值 本文从传统伦理学理论的角度出发,对在研发和生产过程中采用人工智能进行了详细评估,并为今后在更广泛的人力资源管理领域开展人工智能研究提供了一个综合性理论框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A systematic literature review on artificial intelligence in recruiting and selection: a matter of ethics

Purpose

Starting from the relevance of ethics to the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in the context of employee recruitment and selection (R&S), in this article, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of the literature in light of the main ethical theories (utilitarian theories, theories of justice, and theories of rights) to identify a future research agenda and practical implications.

Design/methodology/approach

On the basis of the best-quality and most influential journals, we conducted a systematic review of 120 articles from two databases (Web of Science and Scopus) to provide descriptive results and adopt a framework for deductive classification of the main topics.

Findings

Inspired by the three ethical theories, we identified three thematic lines of enquiry for the debate on AI in R&S: (1) the utilitarian view: the efficient optimisation of R&S through AI; (2) the justice view: the perceptions of justice and fairness related to AI techniques; and (3) the rights view: the respect for legal and human rights requirements when AI is applied.

Originality/value

This article provides a detailed assessment of the adoption of AI in the R&S process from the standpoint of traditional ethics theories and offers an integrative theoretical framework for future research on AI in the broader field of HRM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Personnel Review
Personnel Review Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Personnel Review (PR) publishes rigorous, well written articles from a range of theoretical and methodological traditions. We value articles that have high originality and that engage with contemporary challenges to human resource management theory, policy and practice development. Research that highlights innovation and emerging issues in the field, and the medium- to long-term impact of HRM policy and practice, is especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Mentoring global talent: an integrative review Fighting fear: the buffering of well-being-HRM on the effects of nurses’ fear of COVID-19 on job stress and patient care A temporal evolution of human resource management and technology research: a retrospective bibliometric analysis Effects of performance appraisal on employees’ extra-role behaviors and turnover intentions – A parallel mediation model Artificial intelligence-based virtual assistant and employee engagement: an empirical investigation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1