刷新医师培训生临床技能评估方法

IF 1.8 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Advances in Medical Education and Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-22 DOI:10.2147/amep.s463223
Elizabeth Whiting, A Curtis Lee, Balakrishnan R Nair
{"title":"刷新医师培训生临床技能评估方法","authors":"Elizabeth Whiting, A Curtis Lee, Balakrishnan R Nair","doi":"10.2147/amep.s463223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Purpose:</strong> The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) oversees physician training across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. Success in a written examination and clinical skills assessment (known as the clinical examination) at the mid-point of training is a requirement to progress from basic to advanced training. The clinical examination had evolved over many years without a review process. This paper describes the approach taken, the changes made and the evaluation undertaken as part of a formal review.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> A working party that included education experts and examiners experienced in the assessment of clinical skills was established. The purpose of the clinical examination and competencies being assessed were clarified and were linked to learning objectives. Significant changes to the marking and scoring approaches resulted in a more holistic approach to the assessment of candidate performance with greater transparency of standards. Evaluation over a 2-year period was undertaken before the adoption of the new approach in 2019.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> In 2017 testing of a new marking rubric occurred during the annual examination cycle which confirmed feasibility and acceptability. The following year an extensive trial utilising the new marking rubric and a new scoring approach took place involving 1142 examiners, 880 candidates and 5280 scoresheets which led to some minor modifications to the scoring system. The final marking and scoring approaches resulted in unchanged pass rates and improved inter-rater reliability. Feedback from examiners confirmed that the new marking and scoring approaches were easier to use and enabled better feedback on performance for candidates.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The refresh of the RACP clinical examination has resulted in an assessment that has clarity of purpose, is linked to learning objectives, has greater transparency of expected standards, has improved inter-rater reliability, is well accepted by examiners and enables feedback on examination performance to candidates.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> physician assessment, reliability, clinical assessment, long case, short case<br/>","PeriodicalId":47404,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refresh of a Clinical Skills Assessment for Physician Trainees\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth Whiting, A Curtis Lee, Balakrishnan R Nair\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/amep.s463223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Purpose:</strong> The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) oversees physician training across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. Success in a written examination and clinical skills assessment (known as the clinical examination) at the mid-point of training is a requirement to progress from basic to advanced training. The clinical examination had evolved over many years without a review process. This paper describes the approach taken, the changes made and the evaluation undertaken as part of a formal review.<br/><strong>Methods:</strong> A working party that included education experts and examiners experienced in the assessment of clinical skills was established. The purpose of the clinical examination and competencies being assessed were clarified and were linked to learning objectives. Significant changes to the marking and scoring approaches resulted in a more holistic approach to the assessment of candidate performance with greater transparency of standards. Evaluation over a 2-year period was undertaken before the adoption of the new approach in 2019.<br/><strong>Results:</strong> In 2017 testing of a new marking rubric occurred during the annual examination cycle which confirmed feasibility and acceptability. The following year an extensive trial utilising the new marking rubric and a new scoring approach took place involving 1142 examiners, 880 candidates and 5280 scoresheets which led to some minor modifications to the scoring system. The final marking and scoring approaches resulted in unchanged pass rates and improved inter-rater reliability. Feedback from examiners confirmed that the new marking and scoring approaches were easier to use and enabled better feedback on performance for candidates.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The refresh of the RACP clinical examination has resulted in an assessment that has clarity of purpose, is linked to learning objectives, has greater transparency of expected standards, has improved inter-rater reliability, is well accepted by examiners and enables feedback on examination performance to candidates.<br/><br/><strong>Keywords:</strong> physician assessment, reliability, clinical assessment, long case, short case<br/>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Medical Education and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s463223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Medical Education and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/amep.s463223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:澳大利亚皇家内科学院(RACP)负责监督澳大利亚和新西兰的医师培训。培训中期的笔试和临床技能评估(称为临床考试)是由基础培训晋升为高级培训的必要条件。临床考试经历了多年的发展,却没有一个审查过程。本文介绍了作为正式审查的一部分所采取的方法、做出的改变和进行的评估:方法:成立了一个工作小组,成员包括教育专家和在临床技能评估方面经验丰富的考官。明确了临床考试的目的和所评估的能力,并将其与学习目标联系起来。对评分和计分方法进行了重大改革,从而以更全面的方法评估考生的表现,提高了标准的透明度。在 2019 年采用新方法之前,进行了为期两年的评估:2017 年,在年度考试周期内对新的评分标准进行了测试,确认了其可行性和可接受性。第二年,对新评分标准和新评分方法进行了广泛的试用,共有 1142 名考官、880 名考生和 5280 份评分表参与,最终对评分系统进行了一些小的修改。最终的评分和计分方法使及格率保持不变,并提高了评分者之间的可靠性。考官的反馈证实,新的评分和计分方法更易于使用,并能为考生提供更好的成绩反馈:RACP临床考试更新后的评估目的明确,与学习目标相关联,预期标准的透明度更高,评分者之间的可靠性得到了提高,得到了考官的认可,并能够向考生提供考试成绩反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Refresh of a Clinical Skills Assessment for Physician Trainees
Purpose: The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP) oversees physician training across Australia and Aotearoa New Zealand. Success in a written examination and clinical skills assessment (known as the clinical examination) at the mid-point of training is a requirement to progress from basic to advanced training. The clinical examination had evolved over many years without a review process. This paper describes the approach taken, the changes made and the evaluation undertaken as part of a formal review.
Methods: A working party that included education experts and examiners experienced in the assessment of clinical skills was established. The purpose of the clinical examination and competencies being assessed were clarified and were linked to learning objectives. Significant changes to the marking and scoring approaches resulted in a more holistic approach to the assessment of candidate performance with greater transparency of standards. Evaluation over a 2-year period was undertaken before the adoption of the new approach in 2019.
Results: In 2017 testing of a new marking rubric occurred during the annual examination cycle which confirmed feasibility and acceptability. The following year an extensive trial utilising the new marking rubric and a new scoring approach took place involving 1142 examiners, 880 candidates and 5280 scoresheets which led to some minor modifications to the scoring system. The final marking and scoring approaches resulted in unchanged pass rates and improved inter-rater reliability. Feedback from examiners confirmed that the new marking and scoring approaches were easier to use and enabled better feedback on performance for candidates.
Conclusion: The refresh of the RACP clinical examination has resulted in an assessment that has clarity of purpose, is linked to learning objectives, has greater transparency of expected standards, has improved inter-rater reliability, is well accepted by examiners and enables feedback on examination performance to candidates.

Keywords: physician assessment, reliability, clinical assessment, long case, short case
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Advances in Medical Education and Practice EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
189
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Developing and Validating Entrustable Professional Activities (EPAs) for Rheumatology Fellowship Training Programs in Saudi Arabia: A Delphi Study Students’ Perception of Peer- Students Mentoring Program “Big Sibling Mentoring Program” to Complement Faculty Mentoring of First-Year Medical Students in Saudi Arabia Incorporating Technology Adoption in Medical Education: A Qualitative Study of Medical Students’ Perspectives [Letter] Development, Implementation, and Assessment of an Online Modular Telehealth Curriculum for Health Professions Students [Letter] Competency of Nurses on Electrocardiogram Monitoring and Interpretation in Selected Hospitals of Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1