疑似肉芽肿淋巴细胞间质性肺病(GLILD)肺活检的现行做法和注意事项:临床医师调查。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM Respiration Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-22 DOI:10.1159/000540101
Heba M Bintalib, Jesper Rømhild Davidsen, Annick A J M Van de Ven, Sarah Goddard, Siobhan O Burns, Klaus Warnatz, John R Hurst
{"title":"疑似肉芽肿淋巴细胞间质性肺病(GLILD)肺活检的现行做法和注意事项:临床医师调查。","authors":"Heba M Bintalib, Jesper Rømhild Davidsen, Annick A J M Van de Ven, Sarah Goddard, Siobhan O Burns, Klaus Warnatz, John R Hurst","doi":"10.1159/000540101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study explores clinicians' diagnostic practices and perceptions in the context of granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD), a pulmonary manifestation of common variable immunodeficiency disorder. The aim was to gain valuable insights into key aspects, such as the utilization of radiological features for diagnostic purposes, indications for lung biopsy, preferred biopsy techniques, and the relative importance of different histopathological findings in confirming GLILD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A survey targeting expert clinicians was conducted, focusing on their experiences, practices, and attitudes towards lung biopsy in suspected GLILD cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey revealed that the majority of respondents accepted high-resolution computed tomography as a sufficient alternative to biopsy for making a probable GLILD diagnosis in most patients. There was a consensus among most respondents that the presence of extrapulmonary granulomatous disease is adequate for making a diagnosis of GLILD where the chest imaging and clinical picture are consistent. When a biopsy was recommended, there was notable variation in the preferred initial biopsy technique, with 35% favouring transbronchial biopsy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings underscore the complexity of diagnosing GLILD, indicating varied clinician opinions on the necessity and efficacy of lung biopsies. They highlight the need for further research and the development of consistent diagnostic criteria and management protocols, ultimately aiming to enhance the accuracy and safety of GLILD diagnosis and treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21048,"journal":{"name":"Respiration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current Practices and Considerations in Lung Biopsy for Suspected Granulomatous-Lymphocytic Interstitial Lung Disease: A Clinician Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Heba M Bintalib, Jesper Rømhild Davidsen, Annick A J M Van de Ven, Sarah Goddard, Siobhan O Burns, Klaus Warnatz, John R Hurst\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000540101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study explores clinicians' diagnostic practices and perceptions in the context of granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD), a pulmonary manifestation of common variable immunodeficiency disorder. The aim was to gain valuable insights into key aspects, such as the utilization of radiological features for diagnostic purposes, indications for lung biopsy, preferred biopsy techniques, and the relative importance of different histopathological findings in confirming GLILD.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A survey targeting expert clinicians was conducted, focusing on their experiences, practices, and attitudes towards lung biopsy in suspected GLILD cases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey revealed that the majority of respondents accepted high-resolution computed tomography as a sufficient alternative to biopsy for making a probable GLILD diagnosis in most patients. There was a consensus among most respondents that the presence of extrapulmonary granulomatous disease is adequate for making a diagnosis of GLILD where the chest imaging and clinical picture are consistent. When a biopsy was recommended, there was notable variation in the preferred initial biopsy technique, with 35% favouring transbronchial biopsy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings underscore the complexity of diagnosing GLILD, indicating varied clinician opinions on the necessity and efficacy of lung biopsies. They highlight the need for further research and the development of consistent diagnostic criteria and management protocols, ultimately aiming to enhance the accuracy and safety of GLILD diagnosis and treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiration\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11548095/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540101\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:肉芽肿淋巴细胞间质性肺病(GLILD)是常见变异性免疫缺陷病(CVID)的一种肺部表现,本研究探讨了临床医生在诊断肉芽肿淋巴细胞间质性肺病时的做法和看法。调查的目的是就一些关键方面获得有价值的见解,如利用放射学特征进行诊断、肺活检的适应症、首选的活检技术以及不同组织病理学结果在确诊 GLILD 时的相对重要性:方法:针对临床专家开展了一项调查,重点调查他们对疑似 GLILD 病例进行肺活检的经验、做法和态度:调查显示,大多数受访者认为高分辨率计算机断层扫描(HRCT)足以替代活组织检查,对大多数患者做出 GLILD 的可能诊断。大多数受访者的共识是,在胸部影像和临床表现一致的情况下,出现肺外肉芽肿病足以诊断为 GLILD。在建议进行活检时,首选的初始活检技术存在明显差异,35% 的受访者倾向于经支气管活检:我们的研究结果凸显了诊断GLILD的复杂性,表明临床医生对肺活检的必要性和有效性存在不同意见。结论:我们的研究结果凸显了 GLILD 诊断的复杂性,表明临床医生对肺活检的必要性和有效性存在不同意见,因此需要开展进一步研究,制定一致的诊断标准和管理方案,最终提高 GLILD 诊断和治疗策略的准确性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Current Practices and Considerations in Lung Biopsy for Suspected Granulomatous-Lymphocytic Interstitial Lung Disease: A Clinician Survey.

Introduction: This study explores clinicians' diagnostic practices and perceptions in the context of granulomatous-lymphocytic interstitial lung disease (GLILD), a pulmonary manifestation of common variable immunodeficiency disorder. The aim was to gain valuable insights into key aspects, such as the utilization of radiological features for diagnostic purposes, indications for lung biopsy, preferred biopsy techniques, and the relative importance of different histopathological findings in confirming GLILD.

Method: A survey targeting expert clinicians was conducted, focusing on their experiences, practices, and attitudes towards lung biopsy in suspected GLILD cases.

Results: The survey revealed that the majority of respondents accepted high-resolution computed tomography as a sufficient alternative to biopsy for making a probable GLILD diagnosis in most patients. There was a consensus among most respondents that the presence of extrapulmonary granulomatous disease is adequate for making a diagnosis of GLILD where the chest imaging and clinical picture are consistent. When a biopsy was recommended, there was notable variation in the preferred initial biopsy technique, with 35% favouring transbronchial biopsy.

Conclusion: Our findings underscore the complexity of diagnosing GLILD, indicating varied clinician opinions on the necessity and efficacy of lung biopsies. They highlight the need for further research and the development of consistent diagnostic criteria and management protocols, ultimately aiming to enhance the accuracy and safety of GLILD diagnosis and treatment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Respiration
Respiration 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.40%
发文量
82
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Respiration'' brings together the results of both clinical and experimental investigations on all aspects of the respiratory system in health and disease. Clinical improvements in the diagnosis and treatment of chest and lung diseases are covered, as are the latest findings in physiology, biochemistry, pathology, immunology and pharmacology. The journal includes classic features such as editorials that accompany original articles in clinical and basic science research, reviews and letters to the editor. Further sections are: Technical Notes, The Eye Catcher, What’s Your Diagnosis?, The Opinion Corner, New Drugs in Respiratory Medicine, New Insights from Clinical Practice and Guidelines. ''Respiration'' is the official journal of the Swiss Society for Pneumology (SGP) and also home to the European Association for Bronchology and Interventional Pulmonology (EABIP), which occupies a dedicated section on Interventional Pulmonology in the journal. This modern mix of different features and a stringent peer-review process by a dedicated editorial board make ''Respiration'' a complete guide to progress in thoracic medicine.
期刊最新文献
Poor correlation between diaphragm ultrasound and invasive gold standard technique derived respiratory muscle strength assessment in patients after hospitalization for COVID-19. A multidimensional approach to the management of patients in prolonged weaning from mechanical ventilation - the concept of treatable traits - a narrative review. Successful endobronchial valve placement in the treatment of persistent bronchopleural fistula and empyema allows the avoidance of right completion pneumonectomy. A High-Intensity versus Moderate-Intensity exercise training program in Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency-related COPD (IMAC): a randomized, controlled trial. Mastery Learning Guided by Artificial Intelligence Is Superior to Directed Self-Regulated Learning in Flexible Bronchoscopy Training: An RCT.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1