三种通用粘合剂牙本质微拉伸粘合强度和界面微形态的比较评估

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1922/EJPRD_2706Fathy11
Y Fathy, N R Elkholany, A M AbdAllah, N M Zaghloul
{"title":"三种通用粘合剂牙本质微拉伸粘合强度和界面微形态的比较评估","authors":"Y Fathy, N R Elkholany, A M AbdAllah, N M Zaghloul","doi":"10.1922/EJPRD_2706Fathy11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess and compare the microtensile dentin bond strength (μTBS) and interfacial micromorphology of three universal adhesives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>96 human molars were assigned to three universal adhesives: Single Bond Universal (SBU), CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick (UBQ), and RE-GEN Universal Adhesive (REGEN). Adhesives were applied in self-etch mode. SBU and REGEN were applied following the manufacturers' instructions. UBQ was divided into two subgroups: one following the manufacturer's instructions (UBQ Short) and the other with an extended application time (UBQ Extended). Teeth were restored with nanohybrid resin composite. Specimens were divided into immediate and delayed subgroups. The delayed subgroups were stored for 6 months and subjected to 5000 thermocycles. μTBS was tested, and failure mode was analyzed. Interfacial micromorphology was assessed using a scanning electron microscope. The data were statistically analyzed (p⟨ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adhesive choice, aging, and their interaction significantly affected μTBS. SBU exhibited the highest immediate μTBS, comparable to UBQ (Extended) and REGEN, and significantly higher than UBQ (Short). In delayed testing, SBU outperformed the other adhesives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aging negatively affected the μTBS of UBQ and REGEN, while SBU wasn't affected. The quick application concept of UBQ deteriorated its μTBS compared to the extended application time.</p>","PeriodicalId":45686,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Evaluation of Microtensile Dentin Bond Strength and Interfacial Micromorphology of Three Universal Adhesives.\",\"authors\":\"Y Fathy, N R Elkholany, A M AbdAllah, N M Zaghloul\",\"doi\":\"10.1922/EJPRD_2706Fathy11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess and compare the microtensile dentin bond strength (μTBS) and interfacial micromorphology of three universal adhesives.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>96 human molars were assigned to three universal adhesives: Single Bond Universal (SBU), CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick (UBQ), and RE-GEN Universal Adhesive (REGEN). Adhesives were applied in self-etch mode. SBU and REGEN were applied following the manufacturers' instructions. UBQ was divided into two subgroups: one following the manufacturer's instructions (UBQ Short) and the other with an extended application time (UBQ Extended). Teeth were restored with nanohybrid resin composite. Specimens were divided into immediate and delayed subgroups. The delayed subgroups were stored for 6 months and subjected to 5000 thermocycles. μTBS was tested, and failure mode was analyzed. Interfacial micromorphology was assessed using a scanning electron microscope. The data were statistically analyzed (p⟨ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adhesive choice, aging, and their interaction significantly affected μTBS. SBU exhibited the highest immediate μTBS, comparable to UBQ (Extended) and REGEN, and significantly higher than UBQ (Short). In delayed testing, SBU outperformed the other adhesives.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aging negatively affected the μTBS of UBQ and REGEN, while SBU wasn't affected. The quick application concept of UBQ deteriorated its μTBS compared to the extended application time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2706Fathy11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_2706Fathy11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估和比较三种通用粘合剂的牙本质微拉伸粘接强度(μTBS)和界面微观形态:方法:将 96 颗人类臼齿分配给三种通用粘接剂:单粘接通用粘接剂 (SBU)、CLEARFIL 通用粘接快速粘接剂 (UBQ) 和 RE-GEN 通用粘接剂 (REGEN)。粘合剂以自酸蚀模式使用。SBU 和 REGEN 按照制造商的说明使用。UBQ 被分为两组:一组按照生产商的说明使用(UBQ Short),另一组则延长了使用时间(UBQ Extended)。用纳米杂化树脂复合材料修复牙齿。试样被分为即时亚组和延迟亚组。对μTBS进行测试,并分析失效模式。使用扫描电子显微镜对界面微观形态进行评估。对数据进行了统计分析(p⟨ 0.05):结果:粘合剂选择、老化及其相互作用对 μTBS 有显著影响。SBU 的即时 μTBS 最高,与 UBQ(扩展)和 REGEN 相当,明显高于 UBQ(短)。在延迟测试中,SBU 的表现优于其他粘合剂:老化对 UBQ 和 REGEN 的 μTBS 有负面影响,而 SBU 不受影响。与延长应用时间相比,UBQ 的快速应用概念会降低其 μTBS 值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Evaluation of Microtensile Dentin Bond Strength and Interfacial Micromorphology of Three Universal Adhesives.

Objectives: To assess and compare the microtensile dentin bond strength (μTBS) and interfacial micromorphology of three universal adhesives.

Methods: 96 human molars were assigned to three universal adhesives: Single Bond Universal (SBU), CLEARFIL Universal Bond Quick (UBQ), and RE-GEN Universal Adhesive (REGEN). Adhesives were applied in self-etch mode. SBU and REGEN were applied following the manufacturers' instructions. UBQ was divided into two subgroups: one following the manufacturer's instructions (UBQ Short) and the other with an extended application time (UBQ Extended). Teeth were restored with nanohybrid resin composite. Specimens were divided into immediate and delayed subgroups. The delayed subgroups were stored for 6 months and subjected to 5000 thermocycles. μTBS was tested, and failure mode was analyzed. Interfacial micromorphology was assessed using a scanning electron microscope. The data were statistically analyzed (p⟨ 0.05).

Results: The adhesive choice, aging, and their interaction significantly affected μTBS. SBU exhibited the highest immediate μTBS, comparable to UBQ (Extended) and REGEN, and significantly higher than UBQ (Short). In delayed testing, SBU outperformed the other adhesives.

Conclusions: Aging negatively affected the μTBS of UBQ and REGEN, while SBU wasn't affected. The quick application concept of UBQ deteriorated its μTBS compared to the extended application time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry is published quarterly and includes clinical and research articles in subjects such as prosthodontics, operative dentistry, implantology, endodontics, periodontics and dental materials.
期刊最新文献
Does the Incorporation of Graphene Oxide into PMMA Influence its Antimicrobial Activity? Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement using Robotics. A Systematic Review of in vitro Studies. Influence of Different Undercut Depths of Clasp Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting on Retentive Force. Long-Term Bonding Efficacy of CAD/CAM Hybrid Restorative Materials and Universal Adhesives. Clinical Performance of Short Fibre-reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement Restorations in Cervical Carious Lesions: 12-Month Randomized Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1