南非约翰内斯堡威茨唐纳德-戈登医疗中心的肾移植受体和死亡供体风险概况:9 年回顾。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Samj South African Medical Journal Pub Date : 2024-04-24 DOI:10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i3b.1321
F Van der Schyff, M Barnard, B Ströbele, M De Jager, R Britz, P Gaylard, J Loveland
{"title":"南非约翰内斯堡威茨唐纳德-戈登医疗中心的肾移植受体和死亡供体风险概况:9 年回顾。","authors":"F Van der Schyff, M Barnard, B Ströbele, M De Jager, R Britz, P Gaylard, J Loveland","doi":"10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i3b.1321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal transplantation is the gold-standard therapy for end-stage renal disease. Decision-making around the acceptance of deceased-donor organs is complex and time sensitive. Risk scoring systems for both donors and recipients attempt to simplify the allocation of renal grafts to the most appropriate recipient.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the role of these transplant risk scores in the South African (SA) setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 188 adult deceased-donor organ referrals over the 9-year period 1 January 2013 - 31 December 2021 were included. The Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) and the UK KDRI were calculated for each donor. Recipients who were allocated these grafts were characterised, and the Hennepin Transplant Risk Score and the Kidney Transplant Morbidity Index (KTMI) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median (interquartile range) KDRI was 1.2 (0.9 - 1.6), confirming that low- to average-risk donors were being utilised. Similarly, the median UK KDRI was 0.9 (0.8 - 1.2). Both these scores performed poorly in predicting graft and patient survival, with a C-statistic of 0.5. Renal recipient risk scores also demonstrated low- to average-risk patients being transplanted, with a median Hennepin score of 2 - 4 points and a KTMI of 2 points. These recipient scores predict increased recipient mortality at high scores, albeit with low sensitivity, and were not significantly associated with graft survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deceased-donor and renal recipient risk scores commonly used internationally performed poorly in predicting graft survival in our cohort, and should be used with caution in the SA setting. A conservative approach to organ donor referral and utilisation as well as renal transplant recipient listing was noted.</p>","PeriodicalId":49576,"journal":{"name":"Samj South African Medical Journal","volume":"114 3b","pages":"e1321"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Renal transplant recipient and deceased-donor risk profiles at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa: A 9-year review.\",\"authors\":\"F Van der Schyff, M Barnard, B Ströbele, M De Jager, R Britz, P Gaylard, J Loveland\",\"doi\":\"10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i3b.1321\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal transplantation is the gold-standard therapy for end-stage renal disease. Decision-making around the acceptance of deceased-donor organs is complex and time sensitive. Risk scoring systems for both donors and recipients attempt to simplify the allocation of renal grafts to the most appropriate recipient.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate the role of these transplant risk scores in the South African (SA) setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 188 adult deceased-donor organ referrals over the 9-year period 1 January 2013 - 31 December 2021 were included. The Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) and the UK KDRI were calculated for each donor. Recipients who were allocated these grafts were characterised, and the Hennepin Transplant Risk Score and the Kidney Transplant Morbidity Index (KTMI) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median (interquartile range) KDRI was 1.2 (0.9 - 1.6), confirming that low- to average-risk donors were being utilised. Similarly, the median UK KDRI was 0.9 (0.8 - 1.2). Both these scores performed poorly in predicting graft and patient survival, with a C-statistic of 0.5. Renal recipient risk scores also demonstrated low- to average-risk patients being transplanted, with a median Hennepin score of 2 - 4 points and a KTMI of 2 points. These recipient scores predict increased recipient mortality at high scores, albeit with low sensitivity, and were not significantly associated with graft survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Deceased-donor and renal recipient risk scores commonly used internationally performed poorly in predicting graft survival in our cohort, and should be used with caution in the SA setting. A conservative approach to organ donor referral and utilisation as well as renal transplant recipient listing was noted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49576,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Samj South African Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"114 3b\",\"pages\":\"e1321\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Samj South African Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i3b.1321\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Samj South African Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2024.v114i3b.1321","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾移植是治疗终末期肾病的金标准疗法。接受已故捐献者器官的决策既复杂又费时。针对供体和受体的风险评分系统试图简化将肾移植分配给最合适受体的过程:调查这些移植风险评分在南非环境中的作用:方法:纳入 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日这 9 年间转介的 188 例成人器官捐献者。计算每位捐赠者的肾脏捐赠者风险指数(KDRI)和英国KDRI。对获得这些移植物的受者进行特征描述,并计算亨内平移植风险评分和肾移植发病率指数(KTMI):结果:KDRI的中位数(四分位数间距)为1.2(0.9 - 1.6),证实低风险至平均风险的供体得到了利用。同样,英国 KDRI 的中位数为 0.9 (0.8 - 1.2)。这两项评分在预测移植物和患者存活率方面均表现不佳,C统计量为0.5。肾脏受体风险评分也显示,接受移植的患者风险处于低至平均水平,亨内平评分中位数为 2 - 4 分,KTMI 为 2 分。这些受体评分可预测高分受体死亡率的增加,尽管灵敏度较低,但与移植物存活率并无显著关联:结论:在我们的队列中,国际上常用的死亡供体和肾脏受体风险评分在预测移植物存活率方面表现不佳,在南澳大利亚环境中应谨慎使用。我们注意到在器官捐献者的转介和利用以及肾移植受体的登记方面采取了保守的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Renal transplant recipient and deceased-donor risk profiles at Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa: A 9-year review.

Background: Renal transplantation is the gold-standard therapy for end-stage renal disease. Decision-making around the acceptance of deceased-donor organs is complex and time sensitive. Risk scoring systems for both donors and recipients attempt to simplify the allocation of renal grafts to the most appropriate recipient.

Objectives: To investigate the role of these transplant risk scores in the South African (SA) setting.

Methods: A total of 188 adult deceased-donor organ referrals over the 9-year period 1 January 2013 - 31 December 2021 were included. The Kidney Donor Risk Index (KDRI) and the UK KDRI were calculated for each donor. Recipients who were allocated these grafts were characterised, and the Hennepin Transplant Risk Score and the Kidney Transplant Morbidity Index (KTMI) were calculated.

Results: The median (interquartile range) KDRI was 1.2 (0.9 - 1.6), confirming that low- to average-risk donors were being utilised. Similarly, the median UK KDRI was 0.9 (0.8 - 1.2). Both these scores performed poorly in predicting graft and patient survival, with a C-statistic of 0.5. Renal recipient risk scores also demonstrated low- to average-risk patients being transplanted, with a median Hennepin score of 2 - 4 points and a KTMI of 2 points. These recipient scores predict increased recipient mortality at high scores, albeit with low sensitivity, and were not significantly associated with graft survival.

Conclusion: Deceased-donor and renal recipient risk scores commonly used internationally performed poorly in predicting graft survival in our cohort, and should be used with caution in the SA setting. A conservative approach to organ donor referral and utilisation as well as renal transplant recipient listing was noted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Samj South African Medical Journal
Samj South African Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
175
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The SAMJ is a monthly peer reviewed, internationally indexed, general medical journal. It carries The SAMJ is a monthly, peer-reviewed, internationally indexed, general medical journal publishing leading research impacting clinical care in Africa. The Journal is not limited to articles that have ‘general medical content’, but is intending to capture the spectrum of medical and health sciences, grouped by relevance to the country’s burden of disease. This will include research in the social sciences and economics that is relevant to the medical issues around our burden of disease The journal carries research articles and letters, editorials, clinical practice and other medical articles and personal opinion, South African health-related news, obituaries, general correspondence, and classified advertisements (refer to the section policies for further information).
期刊最新文献
Analysis of emergency centre recidivism for interpersonal violence in a district-level hospital in Cape Town, South Africa. Case report: First reported case of spondylodiscitis caused by Gemella morbillorum in South Africa. Case report: First reported case of spondylodiscitis caused by Gemella morbillorum in South Africa. Climate change, extreme heat and heat waves. Comparison of ultraviolet C light and isopropyl alcohol for the disinfection of cellular phones in a paediatric intensive care unit setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1