开发一种人工智能工具,用于推导初级保健患者的健康社会决定因素:代码设计研讨会的定性研究结果。

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Annals of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1370/afm.3117
Stephanie Garies, Simon Liang, Karen Weyman, Noor Ramji, Mo Alhaj, Andrew D Pinto
{"title":"开发一种人工智能工具,用于推导初级保健患者的健康社会决定因素:代码设计研讨会的定性研究结果。","authors":"Stephanie Garies, Simon Liang, Karen Weyman, Noor Ramji, Mo Alhaj, Andrew D Pinto","doi":"10.1370/afm.3117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Information about social determinants of health (SDOH) is essential for primary care clinicians in the delivery of equitable, comprehensive care, as well as for program planning and resource allocation. SDOH are rarely captured consistently in clinical settings, however. Artificial intelligence (AI) could potentially fill these data gaps, but it needs to be designed collaboratively and thoughtfully. We report on a codesign process with primary care clinicians to understand how an AI tool could be developed, implemented, and used in practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semistructured, 50-minute workshops with a large urban family health team in Toronto, Ontario, Canada asking their feedback on a proposed AI-based tool used to derive patient SDOH from electronic health record data. An inductive thematic analysis was used to describe participants' perspectives regarding the implementation and use of the proposed tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen participants contributed across 4 workshops. Most patient SDOH information was not available or was difficult to find in their electronic health record. Discussions focused on 3 areas related to the implementation and use of an AI tool to derive social data: people, process, and technology. Participants recommended starting with 1 or 2 social determinants (income and housing were suggested as priorities) and emphasized the need for adequate resources, staff, and training materials. They noted many challenges, including how to discuss the use of AI with patients and how to confirm their social needs identified by the AI tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our codesign experience provides guidance from end users on the appropriate and meaningful design and implementation of an AI-based tool for social data in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50973,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Family Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268682/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing an AI Tool to Derive Social Determinants of Health for Primary Care Patients: Qualitative Findings From a Codesign Workshop.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Garies, Simon Liang, Karen Weyman, Noor Ramji, Mo Alhaj, Andrew D Pinto\",\"doi\":\"10.1370/afm.3117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Information about social determinants of health (SDOH) is essential for primary care clinicians in the delivery of equitable, comprehensive care, as well as for program planning and resource allocation. SDOH are rarely captured consistently in clinical settings, however. Artificial intelligence (AI) could potentially fill these data gaps, but it needs to be designed collaboratively and thoughtfully. We report on a codesign process with primary care clinicians to understand how an AI tool could be developed, implemented, and used in practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted semistructured, 50-minute workshops with a large urban family health team in Toronto, Ontario, Canada asking their feedback on a proposed AI-based tool used to derive patient SDOH from electronic health record data. An inductive thematic analysis was used to describe participants' perspectives regarding the implementation and use of the proposed tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen participants contributed across 4 workshops. Most patient SDOH information was not available or was difficult to find in their electronic health record. Discussions focused on 3 areas related to the implementation and use of an AI tool to derive social data: people, process, and technology. Participants recommended starting with 1 or 2 social determinants (income and housing were suggested as priorities) and emphasized the need for adequate resources, staff, and training materials. They noted many challenges, including how to discuss the use of AI with patients and how to confirm their social needs identified by the AI tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our codesign experience provides guidance from end users on the appropriate and meaningful design and implementation of an AI-based tool for social data in primary care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268682/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3117\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.3117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:有关健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)的信息对于初级保健临床医生提供公平、全面的保健服务以及项目规划和资源分配至关重要。然而,在临床环境中,很少能始终如一地获取 SDOH 信息。人工智能(AI)有可能填补这些数据空白,但它需要经过深思熟虑的合作设计。我们报告了一个与初级保健临床医生共同设计的过程,以了解如何开发、实施和在实践中使用人工智能工具:方法:我们与加拿大安大略省多伦多市的一个大型城市家庭医疗团队进行了 50 分钟的半结构式研讨,询问他们对基于人工智能的拟议工具的反馈意见,该工具用于从电子健康记录数据中得出患者的 SDOH。我们采用归纳式主题分析法来描述参与者对拟议工具的实施和使用的看法:15名参与者参加了4次研讨会。大多数患者的 SDOH 信息在电子健康记录中无法找到或很难找到。讨论集中在与实施和使用人工智能工具获取社会数据相关的三个方面:人员、流程和技术。与会者建议从 1 到 2 个社会决定因素入手(收入和住房被认为是优先考虑的因素),并强调需要充足的资源、人员和培训材料。他们指出了许多挑战,包括如何与患者讨论人工智能的使用,以及如何确认人工智能工具所确定的他们的社会需求:我们的代码设计经验为最终用户提供了指导,帮助他们在初级医疗中适当而有意义地设计和实施基于人工智能的社会数据工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing an AI Tool to Derive Social Determinants of Health for Primary Care Patients: Qualitative Findings From a Codesign Workshop.

Purpose: Information about social determinants of health (SDOH) is essential for primary care clinicians in the delivery of equitable, comprehensive care, as well as for program planning and resource allocation. SDOH are rarely captured consistently in clinical settings, however. Artificial intelligence (AI) could potentially fill these data gaps, but it needs to be designed collaboratively and thoughtfully. We report on a codesign process with primary care clinicians to understand how an AI tool could be developed, implemented, and used in practice.

Methods: We conducted semistructured, 50-minute workshops with a large urban family health team in Toronto, Ontario, Canada asking their feedback on a proposed AI-based tool used to derive patient SDOH from electronic health record data. An inductive thematic analysis was used to describe participants' perspectives regarding the implementation and use of the proposed tool.

Results: Fifteen participants contributed across 4 workshops. Most patient SDOH information was not available or was difficult to find in their electronic health record. Discussions focused on 3 areas related to the implementation and use of an AI tool to derive social data: people, process, and technology. Participants recommended starting with 1 or 2 social determinants (income and housing were suggested as priorities) and emphasized the need for adequate resources, staff, and training materials. They noted many challenges, including how to discuss the use of AI with patients and how to confirm their social needs identified by the AI tool.

Conclusions: Our codesign experience provides guidance from end users on the appropriate and meaningful design and implementation of an AI-based tool for social data in primary care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Family Medicine
Annals of Family Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Family Medicine is a peer-reviewed research journal to meet the needs of scientists, practitioners, policymakers, and the patients and communities they serve.
期刊最新文献
Prehospital Clinical Decision-Making for Medication Administration for Behavioral Emergencies. Rapid Antigen Testing in School Health Offices for Surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A. Assessment and comparison of the ILI case definition in clinical and school-based community settings: ORCHARDS/IISP. Efficacy and Safety of BB-12 Supplemented Strawberry Yogurt For Healthy Children on Antibiotics (PLAY ON). Exploratory Pilot Studies to Demonstrate Mechanisms of Preventing Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhea and the Role for Probiotics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1