只进行一次的柔性乙状结肠镜筛查对结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的长期影响:英国柔性乙状结肠镜筛查随机对照试验的 21 年随访。

IF 30.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-20 DOI:10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00190-0
Kate Wooldrage, Emma C Robbins, Stephen W Duffy, Amanda J Cross
{"title":"只进行一次的柔性乙状结肠镜筛查对结直肠癌发病率和死亡率的长期影响:英国柔性乙状结肠镜筛查随机对照试验的 21 年随访。","authors":"Kate Wooldrage, Emma C Robbins, Stephen W Duffy, Amanda J Cross","doi":"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00190-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality; however, uncertainty exists about the duration of protection and differences by sex and age. We assessed effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 21 years' follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial is a multicentre randomised controlled trial that recruited men and women aged 55-64 years from general practices serving 14 hospitals. Among participants indicating that they would attend flexible sigmoidoscopy screening if invited, randomisation (2:1) to the control (no further contact) or intervention (invited to once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening) group was performed centrally in blocks of 12, stratified by centre, general practice, and household type. Masking of intervention was infeasible. Primary outcomes were colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated cumulative incidence. Primary analyses estimated intention-to-treat hazard ratios (HRs) and risk differences, overall and stratified by subsite, sex, and age. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 28352761.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among participants recruited between Nov 14, 1994, and March 30, 1999, 170 432 were eligible and 113 195 were randomly assigned to the control group and 57 237 were randomly assigned to the intervention group. 406 participants were excluded from analyses (268 in the control group and 138 in the intervention group), leaving 112 927 participants in the control group (55 336 [49%] men and 57 591 [51%] women) and 57 099 in the intervention group (27 966 [49%] men and 29 103 [51%] women). Of participants who were invited to be screened, 40 624 (71%) attended screening. Median follow-up was 21·3 years (IQR 18·0-22·2). In the invited-to-screening group, colorectal cancer incidence was reduced compared with the control group (1631 vs 4201 cases; cumulative incidence at 21 years was 3·18% [95% CI 3·03 to 3·34] vs 4·16% [4·04 to 4·29]; HR 0·76 [95% CI 0·72 to 0·81]) with 47 fewer cases per 100 000 person-years (95% CI -56 to -37). Colorectal cancer mortality was also reduced in the invited-to-screening group compared with the control group (502 vs 1329 deaths; cumulative incidence at 21 years was 0·97% [0·88 to 1·06] vs 1·33% [1·26 to 1·40]; HR 0·75 [0·67 to 0·83]) with 16 fewer deaths per 100 000 person-years (-21 to -11). Effects were particularly evident in the distal colorectum (726 incident cancer cases in the invited-to-screening group vs 2434 cases in the control group; HR 0·59 [0·54 to 0·64]; 47 fewer cases per 100 000 person-years [-54 to -41]; 196 cancer deaths in the invited-to-screening group vs 708 deaths in the control group; HR 0·55 [0·47 to 0·64]; 15 fewer deaths per 100 000 person-years [-19 to -12]) and not the proximal colon (871 incident cancer cases in the invited-to-screening group vs 1749 cases in the control group; HR 0·98 [0·91 to 1·07]; one fewer case per 100 000 person-years [-8 to 5]; 277 cancer deaths in the invited-to-screening group vs 547 deaths in the control group; HR 1·00 [0·86 to 1·15]; zero fewer deaths per 100 000 person-years [-4 to 4]). The HR for colorectal cancer incidence was lower in men (0·70 [0·65-0·76]) than women (0·86 [0·79 to 0·93]; p<sub>interaction</sub>=0·0007) but there was no difference by age.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We show that once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality for two decades and provide important data to inform colorectal cancer screening guidelines.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Programme and the Medical Research Council.</p>","PeriodicalId":56028,"journal":{"name":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":30.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: 21-year follow-up of the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Kate Wooldrage, Emma C Robbins, Stephen W Duffy, Amanda J Cross\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00190-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality; however, uncertainty exists about the duration of protection and differences by sex and age. We assessed effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 21 years' follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial is a multicentre randomised controlled trial that recruited men and women aged 55-64 years from general practices serving 14 hospitals. Among participants indicating that they would attend flexible sigmoidoscopy screening if invited, randomisation (2:1) to the control (no further contact) or intervention (invited to once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening) group was performed centrally in blocks of 12, stratified by centre, general practice, and household type. Masking of intervention was infeasible. Primary outcomes were colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated cumulative incidence. Primary analyses estimated intention-to-treat hazard ratios (HRs) and risk differences, overall and stratified by subsite, sex, and age. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 28352761.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among participants recruited between Nov 14, 1994, and March 30, 1999, 170 432 were eligible and 113 195 were randomly assigned to the control group and 57 237 were randomly assigned to the intervention group. 406 participants were excluded from analyses (268 in the control group and 138 in the intervention group), leaving 112 927 participants in the control group (55 336 [49%] men and 57 591 [51%] women) and 57 099 in the intervention group (27 966 [49%] men and 29 103 [51%] women). Of participants who were invited to be screened, 40 624 (71%) attended screening. Median follow-up was 21·3 years (IQR 18·0-22·2). In the invited-to-screening group, colorectal cancer incidence was reduced compared with the control group (1631 vs 4201 cases; cumulative incidence at 21 years was 3·18% [95% CI 3·03 to 3·34] vs 4·16% [4·04 to 4·29]; HR 0·76 [95% CI 0·72 to 0·81]) with 47 fewer cases per 100 000 person-years (95% CI -56 to -37). Colorectal cancer mortality was also reduced in the invited-to-screening group compared with the control group (502 vs 1329 deaths; cumulative incidence at 21 years was 0·97% [0·88 to 1·06] vs 1·33% [1·26 to 1·40]; HR 0·75 [0·67 to 0·83]) with 16 fewer deaths per 100 000 person-years (-21 to -11). Effects were particularly evident in the distal colorectum (726 incident cancer cases in the invited-to-screening group vs 2434 cases in the control group; HR 0·59 [0·54 to 0·64]; 47 fewer cases per 100 000 person-years [-54 to -41]; 196 cancer deaths in the invited-to-screening group vs 708 deaths in the control group; HR 0·55 [0·47 to 0·64]; 15 fewer deaths per 100 000 person-years [-19 to -12]) and not the proximal colon (871 incident cancer cases in the invited-to-screening group vs 1749 cases in the control group; HR 0·98 [0·91 to 1·07]; one fewer case per 100 000 person-years [-8 to 5]; 277 cancer deaths in the invited-to-screening group vs 547 deaths in the control group; HR 1·00 [0·86 to 1·15]; zero fewer deaths per 100 000 person-years [-4 to 4]). The HR for colorectal cancer incidence was lower in men (0·70 [0·65-0·76]) than women (0·86 [0·79 to 0·93]; p<sub>interaction</sub>=0·0007) but there was no difference by age.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>We show that once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality for two decades and provide important data to inform colorectal cancer screening guidelines.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Programme and the Medical Research Council.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":30.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00190-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(24)00190-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:柔性乙状结肠镜筛查可降低结直肠癌的发病率和死亡率;但其保护作用的持续时间以及性别和年龄差异还存在不确定性。我们在 21 年的随访后评估了只进行一次的柔性乙状结肠镜筛查的效果:英国柔性乙状结肠镜筛查试验是一项多中心随机对照试验,从为 14 家医院服务的全科诊所招募 55-64 岁的男性和女性。在表示如果受邀将参加柔性乙状结肠镜筛查的参与者中,按中心、全科诊所和家庭类型分层,以 12 人为一组,集中随机分配(2:1)到对照组(不再联系)或干预组(受邀参加仅一次的柔性乙状结肠镜筛查)。无法对干预措施进行掩蔽。主要结果为结直肠癌发病率和死亡率。Kaplan-Meier 法估算累积发病率。主要分析估算了意向治疗危险比(HRs)和风险差异,包括总体风险和按分站、性别和年龄分层的风险。该试验已在 ISRCTN 注册,编号为 28352761:在 1994 年 11 月 14 日至 1999 年 3 月 30 日期间招募的参与者中,有 170 432 人符合条件,其中 113 195 人被随机分配到对照组,57 237 人被随机分配到干预组。分析中排除了 406 名参与者(对照组 268 人,干预组 138 人),因此对照组有 112 927 人(男性 55 336 人 [49%],女性 57 591 人 [51%]),干预组有 57 099 人(男性 27 966 人 [49%],女性 29 103 人 [51%])。在受邀接受筛查的参与者中,有 40 624 人(71%)参加了筛查。随访时间中位数为 21-3 年(IQR 为 18-0-22-2)。与对照组相比,受邀筛查组的结直肠癌发病率有所降低(1631 例 vs 4201 例;21 年的累积发病率为 3-18% [95% CI 3-03 to 3-34] vs 4-16% [4-04 to 4-29];HR 0-76 [95% CI 0-72 to 0-81]),每 10 万人年减少 47 例(95% CI -56-37)。与对照组相比,受邀筛查组的结直肠癌死亡率也有所下降(502 对 1329 例死亡;21 年累计发病率为 0-97% [0-88 至 1-06] 对 1-33% [1-26 至 1-40];HR 0-75 [0-67 至 0-83]),每 10 万人年死亡人数减少 16 例(-21 至 -11)。对远端结直肠的影响尤为明显(受邀筛查组有 726 例癌症病例,对照组有 2434 例;HR 0-59 [0-54 至 0-64];每 10 万人年减少 47 例[-54 至 -41];受邀筛查组有 196 例癌症死亡病例,对照组有 708 例;HR 0-55 [0-47 至 0-64];每 10 万人年减少 15 例死亡[-19 至 -12]),而不是近端结肠(受邀筛查组中有 871 例癌症病例,对照组中有 1749 例;HR 0-98 [0-91 至 1-07];每 10 万人年减少 1 例[-8 至 5];受邀筛查组中有 277 例癌症死亡,对照组中有 547 例;HR 1-00 [0-86 至 1-15];每 10 万人年减少 0 例死亡[-4 至 4])。男性结直肠癌发病率的 HR 值(0-70 [0-65-0-76])低于女性(0-86 [0-79 至 0-93];pinteraction=0-0007),但年龄没有差异:我们的研究表明,只需进行一次柔性乙状结肠镜筛查,就能在二十年内降低结直肠癌发病率和死亡率,并为结直肠癌筛查指南提供了重要数据:国家健康与护理研究所健康技术评估计划和医学研究委员会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-term effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: 21-year follow-up of the UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening randomised controlled trial.

Background: Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality; however, uncertainty exists about the duration of protection and differences by sex and age. We assessed effects of once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 21 years' follow-up.

Methods: The UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial is a multicentre randomised controlled trial that recruited men and women aged 55-64 years from general practices serving 14 hospitals. Among participants indicating that they would attend flexible sigmoidoscopy screening if invited, randomisation (2:1) to the control (no further contact) or intervention (invited to once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening) group was performed centrally in blocks of 12, stratified by centre, general practice, and household type. Masking of intervention was infeasible. Primary outcomes were colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated cumulative incidence. Primary analyses estimated intention-to-treat hazard ratios (HRs) and risk differences, overall and stratified by subsite, sex, and age. The trial is registered with ISRCTN, number 28352761.

Findings: Among participants recruited between Nov 14, 1994, and March 30, 1999, 170 432 were eligible and 113 195 were randomly assigned to the control group and 57 237 were randomly assigned to the intervention group. 406 participants were excluded from analyses (268 in the control group and 138 in the intervention group), leaving 112 927 participants in the control group (55 336 [49%] men and 57 591 [51%] women) and 57 099 in the intervention group (27 966 [49%] men and 29 103 [51%] women). Of participants who were invited to be screened, 40 624 (71%) attended screening. Median follow-up was 21·3 years (IQR 18·0-22·2). In the invited-to-screening group, colorectal cancer incidence was reduced compared with the control group (1631 vs 4201 cases; cumulative incidence at 21 years was 3·18% [95% CI 3·03 to 3·34] vs 4·16% [4·04 to 4·29]; HR 0·76 [95% CI 0·72 to 0·81]) with 47 fewer cases per 100 000 person-years (95% CI -56 to -37). Colorectal cancer mortality was also reduced in the invited-to-screening group compared with the control group (502 vs 1329 deaths; cumulative incidence at 21 years was 0·97% [0·88 to 1·06] vs 1·33% [1·26 to 1·40]; HR 0·75 [0·67 to 0·83]) with 16 fewer deaths per 100 000 person-years (-21 to -11). Effects were particularly evident in the distal colorectum (726 incident cancer cases in the invited-to-screening group vs 2434 cases in the control group; HR 0·59 [0·54 to 0·64]; 47 fewer cases per 100 000 person-years [-54 to -41]; 196 cancer deaths in the invited-to-screening group vs 708 deaths in the control group; HR 0·55 [0·47 to 0·64]; 15 fewer deaths per 100 000 person-years [-19 to -12]) and not the proximal colon (871 incident cancer cases in the invited-to-screening group vs 1749 cases in the control group; HR 0·98 [0·91 to 1·07]; one fewer case per 100 000 person-years [-8 to 5]; 277 cancer deaths in the invited-to-screening group vs 547 deaths in the control group; HR 1·00 [0·86 to 1·15]; zero fewer deaths per 100 000 person-years [-4 to 4]). The HR for colorectal cancer incidence was lower in men (0·70 [0·65-0·76]) than women (0·86 [0·79 to 0·93]; pinteraction=0·0007) but there was no difference by age.

Interpretation: We show that once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening reduces colorectal cancer incidence and mortality for two decades and provide important data to inform colorectal cancer screening guidelines.

Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Technology Assessment Programme and the Medical Research Council.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
50.30
自引率
1.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology is an authoritative forum for key opinion leaders across medicine, government, and health systems to influence clinical practice, explore global policy, and inform constructive, positive change worldwide. The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology publishes papers that reflect the rich variety of ongoing clinical research in these fields, especially in the areas of inflammatory bowel diseases, NAFLD and NASH, functional gastrointestinal disorders, digestive cancers, and viral hepatitis.
期刊最新文献
Augmenting colonoscopy with AI: insights and future directions. Blood tests for colorectal cancer: practical or premature? Irritable bowel syndrome: an urgent issue. Natural history and progression of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease. Nocebo, gut disorders, and diet.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1