囊性纤维化患者服用 Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor 后停用高渗盐水和 Dornase Alfa 的影响

Nicole Mayer-Hamblett, Alex H Gifford, Margaret Kloster, Renee Russell, Andrew T Braun, Ronald L Gibson, Jordana E Hoppe, Raksha Jain, Rachel W Linnemann, Theodore G Liou, Jerimiah Lysinger, Carlos Milla, Kristin A Riekert, Gregory S Sawicki, Julia Young, David Nichols
{"title":"囊性纤维化患者服用 Elexacaftor/Tezacaftor/Ivacaftor 后停用高渗盐水和 Dornase Alfa 的影响","authors":"Nicole Mayer-Hamblett, Alex H Gifford, Margaret Kloster, Renee Russell, Andrew T Braun, Ronald L Gibson, Jordana E Hoppe, Raksha Jain, Rachel W Linnemann, Theodore G Liou, Jerimiah Lysinger, Carlos Milla, Kristin A Riekert, Gregory S Sawicki, Julia Young, David Nichols","doi":"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-366OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Evaluating approaches to reduce treatment burden is a research priority among people with cystic fibrosis on highly effective modulators, including elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI). <b>Objectives:</b> We sought to evaluate the impact of discontinuing both hypertonic saline (HS) and dornase alfa (DA) versus continuing both therapies among a subgroup of participants in the SIMPLIFY study who sequentially participated in trials evaluating the independent clinical effects of discontinuing HS and DA. <b>Methods:</b> SIMPLIFY participants ≥12 years old on ETI and constituting a subgroup using both HS and DA at study entry were randomized to the HS or DA trial and then randomized 1:1 to continue or discontinue the applicable therapy for 6 weeks. After completion of the first trial, eligible participants could enroll in the second trial beginning with a 2-week run-in. Study outcomes were compared across the duration of SIMPLIFY participation between a cohort remaining on both therapies during SIMPLIFY and a cohort that sequentially discontinued both as a result of trial randomizations. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate treatment differences, adjusted for time between trials, trial order, baseline age, sex at birth, and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV<sub>1</sub>) at study entry. <b>Results:</b> Forty-three participants discontinued both therapies by the end of SIMPLIFY, and 63 remained on both, with overall average ppFEV<sub>1</sub> of 96.7% at study entry and 3.9 months as the average duration of follow-up from beginning of the first trial to completion of the second trial, including time between trials. No clinically meaningful difference in the change in ppFEV<sub>1</sub> from baseline to completion of the second trial was observed between those who discontinued and those who remained on both therapies (difference: 0.22% off-on; 95% confidence interval = -1.60, 2.03). Changes in lung clearance index at 2.5% starting concentration, patient-reported outcomes, and safety outcomes were also comparable. Patient-reported treatment burden, as measured by a Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised subscale, significantly decreased in those who discontinued both therapies. <b>Conclusions:</b> SIMPLIFY participants who sequentially discontinued both HS and DA experienced no meaningful changes in clinical outcomes and reported decreased treatment burden as compared with those who remained on both therapies. These data continue to inform a new era of postmodulator care of people with cystic fibrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93876,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","volume":" ","pages":"1507-1515"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568493/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Discontinuing Both Hypertonic Saline and Dornase Alfa after Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor in Cystic Fibrosis.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Mayer-Hamblett, Alex H Gifford, Margaret Kloster, Renee Russell, Andrew T Braun, Ronald L Gibson, Jordana E Hoppe, Raksha Jain, Rachel W Linnemann, Theodore G Liou, Jerimiah Lysinger, Carlos Milla, Kristin A Riekert, Gregory S Sawicki, Julia Young, David Nichols\",\"doi\":\"10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-366OC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Evaluating approaches to reduce treatment burden is a research priority among people with cystic fibrosis on highly effective modulators, including elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI). <b>Objectives:</b> We sought to evaluate the impact of discontinuing both hypertonic saline (HS) and dornase alfa (DA) versus continuing both therapies among a subgroup of participants in the SIMPLIFY study who sequentially participated in trials evaluating the independent clinical effects of discontinuing HS and DA. <b>Methods:</b> SIMPLIFY participants ≥12 years old on ETI and constituting a subgroup using both HS and DA at study entry were randomized to the HS or DA trial and then randomized 1:1 to continue or discontinue the applicable therapy for 6 weeks. After completion of the first trial, eligible participants could enroll in the second trial beginning with a 2-week run-in. Study outcomes were compared across the duration of SIMPLIFY participation between a cohort remaining on both therapies during SIMPLIFY and a cohort that sequentially discontinued both as a result of trial randomizations. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate treatment differences, adjusted for time between trials, trial order, baseline age, sex at birth, and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV<sub>1</sub>) at study entry. <b>Results:</b> Forty-three participants discontinued both therapies by the end of SIMPLIFY, and 63 remained on both, with overall average ppFEV<sub>1</sub> of 96.7% at study entry and 3.9 months as the average duration of follow-up from beginning of the first trial to completion of the second trial, including time between trials. No clinically meaningful difference in the change in ppFEV<sub>1</sub> from baseline to completion of the second trial was observed between those who discontinued and those who remained on both therapies (difference: 0.22% off-on; 95% confidence interval = -1.60, 2.03). Changes in lung clearance index at 2.5% starting concentration, patient-reported outcomes, and safety outcomes were also comparable. Patient-reported treatment burden, as measured by a Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised subscale, significantly decreased in those who discontinued both therapies. <b>Conclusions:</b> SIMPLIFY participants who sequentially discontinued both HS and DA experienced no meaningful changes in clinical outcomes and reported decreased treatment burden as compared with those who remained on both therapies. These data continue to inform a new era of postmodulator care of people with cystic fibrosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93876,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1507-1515\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11568493/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the American Thoracic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-366OC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the American Thoracic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1513/AnnalsATS.202404-366OC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由 评估减轻治疗负担的方法是使用高效调节剂(包括 elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI))的 CF 患者(pwCF)的研究重点。目的 在 SIMPLIFY 研究的一部分参与者中,评估同时停用高渗盐水 (HS) 和多纳酶α (DA) 与同时继续使用这两种疗法的影响,这些参与者先后参加了评估停用 HS 和 DA 的独立临床效果的试验。方法 SIMPLIFY 研究中年龄≥12 岁的 ETI 参与者组成一个亚组,在研究开始时同时使用 HS 和 DA,他们被随机分配到 HS 或 DA 试验中,然后以 1:1 的比例随机分配继续或停止适用疗法 6 周。完成第一项试验后,符合条件的参与者可参加第二项试验,为期 2 周。我们比较了在 SIMPLIFY 试验期间继续使用两种疗法的组群与因试验随机化而先后停止两种疗法的组群在整个 SIMPLIFY 试验期间的研究结果。采用多变量回归模型来估计治疗差异,并根据试验间隔时间、试验顺序、基线年龄、出生时性别和研究开始时预测的一秒用力呼气容积百分比(ppFEV1)进行调整。结果 在SIMPLIFY试验结束时,有43名参与者停止了两种疗法,63名参与者继续使用两种疗法,研究开始时的ppFEV1总平均值为96.7%,从第一项试验开始到第二项试验结束的平均随访时间为3.9个月,包括试验之间的时间。从基线到第二次试验完成期间,ppFEV1的变化在停止使用两种疗法与继续使用两种疗法之间未观察到有临床意义的差异(差异:0.22% Off-On,95% CI:-1.60,2.03)。LCI2.5、患者报告和安全性结果的变化也具有可比性。通过 CFQ-R 分量表测量,停止两种疗法的患者报告的治疗负担显著减轻。结论 SIMPLIFY 参与者相继停用 HS 和 DA 后,其临床结果没有发生有意义的变化,与同时使用两种疗法的患者相比,治疗负担有所减轻。这些数据将继续为 pwCF 调制器后护理的新时代提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Discontinuing Both Hypertonic Saline and Dornase Alfa after Elexacaftor-Tezacaftor-Ivacaftor in Cystic Fibrosis.

Rationale: Evaluating approaches to reduce treatment burden is a research priority among people with cystic fibrosis on highly effective modulators, including elexacaftor-tezacaftor-ivacaftor (ETI). Objectives: We sought to evaluate the impact of discontinuing both hypertonic saline (HS) and dornase alfa (DA) versus continuing both therapies among a subgroup of participants in the SIMPLIFY study who sequentially participated in trials evaluating the independent clinical effects of discontinuing HS and DA. Methods: SIMPLIFY participants ≥12 years old on ETI and constituting a subgroup using both HS and DA at study entry were randomized to the HS or DA trial and then randomized 1:1 to continue or discontinue the applicable therapy for 6 weeks. After completion of the first trial, eligible participants could enroll in the second trial beginning with a 2-week run-in. Study outcomes were compared across the duration of SIMPLIFY participation between a cohort remaining on both therapies during SIMPLIFY and a cohort that sequentially discontinued both as a result of trial randomizations. Multivariable regression models were used to estimate treatment differences, adjusted for time between trials, trial order, baseline age, sex at birth, and percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) at study entry. Results: Forty-three participants discontinued both therapies by the end of SIMPLIFY, and 63 remained on both, with overall average ppFEV1 of 96.7% at study entry and 3.9 months as the average duration of follow-up from beginning of the first trial to completion of the second trial, including time between trials. No clinically meaningful difference in the change in ppFEV1 from baseline to completion of the second trial was observed between those who discontinued and those who remained on both therapies (difference: 0.22% off-on; 95% confidence interval = -1.60, 2.03). Changes in lung clearance index at 2.5% starting concentration, patient-reported outcomes, and safety outcomes were also comparable. Patient-reported treatment burden, as measured by a Cystic Fibrosis Questionnaire-Revised subscale, significantly decreased in those who discontinued both therapies. Conclusions: SIMPLIFY participants who sequentially discontinued both HS and DA experienced no meaningful changes in clinical outcomes and reported decreased treatment burden as compared with those who remained on both therapies. These data continue to inform a new era of postmodulator care of people with cystic fibrosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Airway Remodeling in Cystic Fibrosis Is Heterogeneous. County Level Social Determinates of Health and Correlation with COPD Prevalence in the US. Lest a Smoky Haze of Doubt Suffocate Progress Towards Better Pulse Oximeters. Lung Function Recovery from Pulmonary Exacerbations Treated with Oral Antibiotics in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia. Trends in the Treatment of Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1