建立有尺寸意识的自动配料柜补货模型,以提高效率。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1093/ajhp/zxae214
John Killian L Rodgers, Randy Braun, Erinn Rowe, Kristen M Kruszewski, Evan W Colmenares
{"title":"建立有尺寸意识的自动配料柜补货模型,以提高效率。","authors":"John Killian L Rodgers, Randy Braun, Erinn Rowe, Kristen M Kruszewski, Evan W Colmenares","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxae214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Optimization of automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) has traditionally focused on modifying the inventory within these devices and ignored the replenishment process itself. Rounding replenishment quantities to the nearest package size, termed package size-conscious replenishment (PSCR), was investigated as a way to optimize labor needs for ADC replenishment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A simulation of PSCR for a subset of medications stocked in ADCs at the University of North Carolina Medical Center was conducted. The simulation utilized real-world vend data and rounding factors to model the impact of PSCR on key ADC metrics. The final simulation utilized 2 months of ADC transactions across 410 medications in 149 ADCs. Four replenishment methodologies were simulated: standard replenishment and 3 PSCR strategies, including rounding down, rounding any direction, and rounding up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 3 PSCR methodologies had significantly lower stockout frequencies than standard replenishment at 0.722% (P = 0.026) for rounding down, 0.698% (P = 0.024) for rounding any direction, and 0.680% (P = 0.024) for rounding up vs 0.773% for standard replenishment. PSCR methods were associated with significant time savings for both technician and pharmacist activities (P < 0.001 for all 3 strategies), with a savings of up to 0.27 technician and 0.52 pharmacist full-time equivalents estimated for the rounding-up methodology. Maximum carrying cost was higher for all 3 PSCR methodologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PSCR was modeled to significantly decrease both pharmacist and technician time needed to replenish ADCs while also decreasing stockout frequency. Modest increases in maximum carrying cost were also shown. The simulation created for this evaluation could also be utilized to model other components of the ADC replenishment process.</p>","PeriodicalId":7577,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"e173-e181"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling package size-conscious automated dispensing cabinet replenishment to improve efficiency.\",\"authors\":\"John Killian L Rodgers, Randy Braun, Erinn Rowe, Kristen M Kruszewski, Evan W Colmenares\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ajhp/zxae214\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Optimization of automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) has traditionally focused on modifying the inventory within these devices and ignored the replenishment process itself. Rounding replenishment quantities to the nearest package size, termed package size-conscious replenishment (PSCR), was investigated as a way to optimize labor needs for ADC replenishment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A simulation of PSCR for a subset of medications stocked in ADCs at the University of North Carolina Medical Center was conducted. The simulation utilized real-world vend data and rounding factors to model the impact of PSCR on key ADC metrics. The final simulation utilized 2 months of ADC transactions across 410 medications in 149 ADCs. Four replenishment methodologies were simulated: standard replenishment and 3 PSCR strategies, including rounding down, rounding any direction, and rounding up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 3 PSCR methodologies had significantly lower stockout frequencies than standard replenishment at 0.722% (P = 0.026) for rounding down, 0.698% (P = 0.024) for rounding any direction, and 0.680% (P = 0.024) for rounding up vs 0.773% for standard replenishment. PSCR methods were associated with significant time savings for both technician and pharmacist activities (P < 0.001 for all 3 strategies), with a savings of up to 0.27 technician and 0.52 pharmacist full-time equivalents estimated for the rounding-up methodology. Maximum carrying cost was higher for all 3 PSCR methodologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PSCR was modeled to significantly decrease both pharmacist and technician time needed to replenish ADCs while also decreasing stockout frequency. Modest increases in maximum carrying cost were also shown. The simulation created for this evaluation could also be utilized to model other components of the ADC replenishment process.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e173-e181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae214\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxae214","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

免责声明:为了加快文章的出版速度,AJHP在接受稿件后会尽快在网上发布。被录用的稿件已经过同行评审和校对,但在进行技术格式化和作者校对之前会在网上发布。目的:自动配药柜 (ADC) 的优化传统上侧重于修改这些设备中的库存,而忽略了补货过程本身。将补货数量四舍五入到最接近的包装尺寸,即包装尺寸意识补货(PSCR),作为一种优化自动点胶机补货劳动力需求的方法进行了研究:方法:对北卡罗来纳大学医疗中心 ADC 中库存的部分药品进行了 PSCR 模拟。该模拟利用真实世界的供应商数据和四舍五入因素来模拟 PSCR 对 ADC 关键指标的影响。最终模拟利用了 2 个月的 ADC 交易,涉及 149 个 ADC 中的 410 种药物。模拟了四种补货方法:标准补货和 3 种 PSCR 策略,包括向下舍入、任意方向舍入和向上舍入:结果:所有 3 种 PSCR 方法的缺货频率都明显低于标准补货,其中四舍五入的缺货频率为 0.722% (P = 0.026),任意方向四舍五入的缺货频率为 0.698% (P = 0.024),四舍五入的缺货频率为 0.680% (P = 0.024),而标准补货的缺货频率为 0.773%。PSCR 方法显著节省了技术人员和药剂师的工作时间(所有 3 种策略的 P 均小于 0.001),四舍五入方法估计可节省多达 0.27 个技术人员和 0.52 个药剂师全职当量。所有 3 种 PSCR 方法的最大账面成本均较高:根据模型计算,PSCR 可显著减少药剂师和技术人员补充 ADC 所需的时间,同时降低缺货频率。此外,最大携带成本也略有增加。为本次评估创建的模拟还可用于模拟 ADC 补充流程的其他部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modeling package size-conscious automated dispensing cabinet replenishment to improve efficiency.

Purpose: Optimization of automated dispensing cabinets (ADCs) has traditionally focused on modifying the inventory within these devices and ignored the replenishment process itself. Rounding replenishment quantities to the nearest package size, termed package size-conscious replenishment (PSCR), was investigated as a way to optimize labor needs for ADC replenishment.

Methods: A simulation of PSCR for a subset of medications stocked in ADCs at the University of North Carolina Medical Center was conducted. The simulation utilized real-world vend data and rounding factors to model the impact of PSCR on key ADC metrics. The final simulation utilized 2 months of ADC transactions across 410 medications in 149 ADCs. Four replenishment methodologies were simulated: standard replenishment and 3 PSCR strategies, including rounding down, rounding any direction, and rounding up.

Results: All 3 PSCR methodologies had significantly lower stockout frequencies than standard replenishment at 0.722% (P = 0.026) for rounding down, 0.698% (P = 0.024) for rounding any direction, and 0.680% (P = 0.024) for rounding up vs 0.773% for standard replenishment. PSCR methods were associated with significant time savings for both technician and pharmacist activities (P < 0.001 for all 3 strategies), with a savings of up to 0.27 technician and 0.52 pharmacist full-time equivalents estimated for the rounding-up methodology. Maximum carrying cost was higher for all 3 PSCR methodologies.

Conclusion: PSCR was modeled to significantly decrease both pharmacist and technician time needed to replenish ADCs while also decreasing stockout frequency. Modest increases in maximum carrying cost were also shown. The simulation created for this evaluation could also be utilized to model other components of the ADC replenishment process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.50%
发文量
341
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (AJHP) is the official publication of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). It publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers on contemporary drug therapy and pharmacy practice innovations in hospitals and health systems. With a circulation of more than 43,000, AJHP is the most widely recognized and respected clinical pharmacy journal in the world.
期刊最新文献
Primary care must transform. An international, multicenter post hoc analysis comparing in-person and virtual medication management strategies in post-ICU recovery clinics. Clinical review of substitutions or alternatives for critical chemotherapy drug shortages in hematologic malignancies. Development and implementation of autoverification standardization in the adult and pediatric emergency department. Dual prostacyclin infusions: A case report of a patient symptom-driven transition from high-dose intravenous epoprostenol to subcutaneous treprostinil for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1