Rondy Michael Lazaro, Joshua M Smith, Nicholas Bender, Ankit Punreddy, Nathan Barford, Jennifer H Paul
{"title":"超声引导下髋关节内注射与事先皮下局部麻醉后疼痛的比较。","authors":"Rondy Michael Lazaro, Joshua M Smith, Nicholas Bender, Ankit Punreddy, Nathan Barford, Jennifer H Paul","doi":"10.1097/JSM.0000000000001260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare pain levels of intra-articular hip steroid injections performed with and without prior subcutaneous local anesthesia (LA) injection.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized prospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University-based musculoskeletal clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty-one adult patients undergoing a first-time ultrasound-guided unilateral intra-articular hip steroid injection.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Subjects were randomized into 1 of 2 groups: intra-articular hip injection with prior subcutaneous LA with 2 mL of lidocaine 1% (With LA) or hip injection without prior subcutaneous LA (Without LA). Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (0-100) were collected before and after each injection.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Visual analog scale pain score for the intra-articular hip injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 41 total subjects, 18 were randomized to the Without LA group and 23 to the With LA group. There was no significant difference in baseline (preprocedure) VAS scores between the Without LA (mean ± SD = 39.2 ± 27.2) and With LA (41.2 ± 24.0) groups (P = 0.864). The mean ± SD VAS score for the subcutaneous LA injection in the With LA group was 20.4 ± 16.1. There was no significant difference in VAS scores for the intra-articular hip injection between the Without LA (48.5 ± 27.7) and With LA (39.5 ± 25.7) groups (P = 0.232).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subcutaneous injection of lidocaine before an intra-articular hip injection did not significantly decrease pain from the intra-articular hip injection. Providers may perform intra-articular hip injections with a 22-gauge 3.5-inch spinal needle without the need for an extra subcutaneous LA injection.</p>","PeriodicalId":10355,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Pain With Ultrasound-Guided Intra-Articular Hip Injections With and Without Prior Subcutaneous Local Anesthesia.\",\"authors\":\"Rondy Michael Lazaro, Joshua M Smith, Nicholas Bender, Ankit Punreddy, Nathan Barford, Jennifer H Paul\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JSM.0000000000001260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare pain levels of intra-articular hip steroid injections performed with and without prior subcutaneous local anesthesia (LA) injection.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized prospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University-based musculoskeletal clinic.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty-one adult patients undergoing a first-time ultrasound-guided unilateral intra-articular hip steroid injection.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Subjects were randomized into 1 of 2 groups: intra-articular hip injection with prior subcutaneous LA with 2 mL of lidocaine 1% (With LA) or hip injection without prior subcutaneous LA (Without LA). Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (0-100) were collected before and after each injection.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Visual analog scale pain score for the intra-articular hip injection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 41 total subjects, 18 were randomized to the Without LA group and 23 to the With LA group. There was no significant difference in baseline (preprocedure) VAS scores between the Without LA (mean ± SD = 39.2 ± 27.2) and With LA (41.2 ± 24.0) groups (P = 0.864). The mean ± SD VAS score for the subcutaneous LA injection in the With LA group was 20.4 ± 16.1. There was no significant difference in VAS scores for the intra-articular hip injection between the Without LA (48.5 ± 27.7) and With LA (39.5 ± 25.7) groups (P = 0.232).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Subcutaneous injection of lidocaine before an intra-articular hip injection did not significantly decrease pain from the intra-articular hip injection. Providers may perform intra-articular hip injections with a 22-gauge 3.5-inch spinal needle without the need for an extra subcutaneous LA injection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001260\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JSM.0000000000001260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的比较关节内髋关节类固醇注射与未进行皮下局部麻醉(LA)的疼痛程度:随机前瞻性研究:参与者:41 名接受髋关节内类固醇注射的成年患者:41名首次接受超声引导下单侧髋关节内类固醇注射的成年患者:受试者被随机分为两组中的一组:髋关节内注射前皮下注射2 mL 1%利多卡因的LA(使用LA)或髋关节内注射前不皮下注射LA(不使用LA)。每次注射前后收集视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分(0-100):主要结果测量:髋关节内注射的视觉模拟量表疼痛评分:在41名受试者中,18人被随机分配到无LA组,23人被随机分配到有LA组。无 LA 组(平均值 ± SD = 39.2 ± 27.2)和有 LA 组(41.2 ± 24.0)的基线(术前)VAS 评分无明显差异(P = 0.864)。使用 LA 组皮下注射 LA 的 VAS 评分平均值(± SD)为 20.4 ± 16.1。无LA组(48.5 ± 27.7)和有LA组(39.5 ± 25.7)髋关节内注射的VAS评分无明显差异(P = 0.232):结论:关节内髋关节注射前皮下注射利多卡因并不能明显减轻关节内髋关节注射引起的疼痛。医务人员可以使用 22 号 3.5 英寸脊柱针头进行关节内髋关节注射,而无需额外皮下注射利多卡因。
Comparison of Pain With Ultrasound-Guided Intra-Articular Hip Injections With and Without Prior Subcutaneous Local Anesthesia.
Objective: To compare pain levels of intra-articular hip steroid injections performed with and without prior subcutaneous local anesthesia (LA) injection.
Design: Randomized prospective study.
Setting: University-based musculoskeletal clinic.
Participants: Forty-one adult patients undergoing a first-time ultrasound-guided unilateral intra-articular hip steroid injection.
Interventions: Subjects were randomized into 1 of 2 groups: intra-articular hip injection with prior subcutaneous LA with 2 mL of lidocaine 1% (With LA) or hip injection without prior subcutaneous LA (Without LA). Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores (0-100) were collected before and after each injection.
Main outcome measures: Visual analog scale pain score for the intra-articular hip injection.
Results: Of the 41 total subjects, 18 were randomized to the Without LA group and 23 to the With LA group. There was no significant difference in baseline (preprocedure) VAS scores between the Without LA (mean ± SD = 39.2 ± 27.2) and With LA (41.2 ± 24.0) groups (P = 0.864). The mean ± SD VAS score for the subcutaneous LA injection in the With LA group was 20.4 ± 16.1. There was no significant difference in VAS scores for the intra-articular hip injection between the Without LA (48.5 ± 27.7) and With LA (39.5 ± 25.7) groups (P = 0.232).
Conclusions: Subcutaneous injection of lidocaine before an intra-articular hip injection did not significantly decrease pain from the intra-articular hip injection. Providers may perform intra-articular hip injections with a 22-gauge 3.5-inch spinal needle without the need for an extra subcutaneous LA injection.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine is an international refereed journal published for clinicians with a primary interest in sports medicine practice. The journal publishes original research and reviews covering diagnostics, therapeutics, and rehabilitation in healthy and physically challenged individuals of all ages and levels of sport and exercise participation.