针对碳青霉烯类耐药大肠埃希菌流行序列类型的治疗性噬菌体候选菌株

IF 1.9 2区 农林科学 Q3 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Foodborne pathogens and disease Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1089/fpd.2024.0023
Md Shamsuzzaman, Shukho Kim, Yoon-Jung Choi, Bokyung Kim, Ram Hari Dahal, Minsang Shin, Jungmin Kim
{"title":"针对碳青霉烯类耐药大肠埃希菌流行序列类型的治疗性噬菌体候选菌株","authors":"Md Shamsuzzaman, Shukho Kim, Yoon-Jung Choi, Bokyung Kim, Ram Hari Dahal, Minsang Shin, Jungmin Kim","doi":"10.1089/fpd.2024.0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Carbapenem-resistant <i>Escherichia coli</i> (CREC) is a global threat to public health; therefore, alternative treatment options are urgently needed. Bacteriophages have emerged as promising candidates for combating CREC infections. This study aimed to investigate the genetic basis of phage sensitivity in CREC by evaluating carbapenem resistance among multidrug-resistant (MDR) <i>E. coli</i> isolated in Daegu, South Korea and analyzing their sequence types (STs) with phage susceptibility spectra. Among the 60 MDR <i>E. coli</i> isolates, 80.4% were identified as CREC, with 77.0% demonstrating resistance to imipenem and 66.6% to meropenem. Moreover, 70 lytic <i>E. coli</i> bacteriophages were isolated from hospital sewage water and evaluated against those <i>60 E. coli</i> isolates. The phages exhibited lytic activity of 33%-60%, with average titers ranging from 5.6 × 10<sup>12</sup> to 2.4 × 10<sup>13</sup> PFU/mL (Plaque-Forming Unit). Furthermore, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis of the bacterial isolates revealed 14 distinct STs, mostly belonging to ST131, ST410, and ST648. Notably, the phage susceptibility spectra of ST73, ST13003, ST648, ST2311, ST167, ST405, ST607, ST7962, and ST131 were significantly different. Thus, the isolated phages can effectively lyse CREC isolates, particularly those with clinically dominant STs. Conversely, ST410 exhibited a 14.2%-87.14% susceptibility spectrum, whereas ST1139, ST1487, ST10, and ST206 did not lyse, suggesting the presence of more resistant STs. Future studies are warranted to identify the reasons behind this resistance and address it. Ultimately, this study will aid in developing focused treatments to address these pressing global health issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":12333,"journal":{"name":"Foodborne pathogens and disease","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapeutic Phage Candidates for Targeting Prevalent Sequence Types of Carbapenem-Resistant <i>Escherichia coli</i>.\",\"authors\":\"Md Shamsuzzaman, Shukho Kim, Yoon-Jung Choi, Bokyung Kim, Ram Hari Dahal, Minsang Shin, Jungmin Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/fpd.2024.0023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Carbapenem-resistant <i>Escherichia coli</i> (CREC) is a global threat to public health; therefore, alternative treatment options are urgently needed. Bacteriophages have emerged as promising candidates for combating CREC infections. This study aimed to investigate the genetic basis of phage sensitivity in CREC by evaluating carbapenem resistance among multidrug-resistant (MDR) <i>E. coli</i> isolated in Daegu, South Korea and analyzing their sequence types (STs) with phage susceptibility spectra. Among the 60 MDR <i>E. coli</i> isolates, 80.4% were identified as CREC, with 77.0% demonstrating resistance to imipenem and 66.6% to meropenem. Moreover, 70 lytic <i>E. coli</i> bacteriophages were isolated from hospital sewage water and evaluated against those <i>60 E. coli</i> isolates. The phages exhibited lytic activity of 33%-60%, with average titers ranging from 5.6 × 10<sup>12</sup> to 2.4 × 10<sup>13</sup> PFU/mL (Plaque-Forming Unit). Furthermore, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis of the bacterial isolates revealed 14 distinct STs, mostly belonging to ST131, ST410, and ST648. Notably, the phage susceptibility spectra of ST73, ST13003, ST648, ST2311, ST167, ST405, ST607, ST7962, and ST131 were significantly different. Thus, the isolated phages can effectively lyse CREC isolates, particularly those with clinically dominant STs. Conversely, ST410 exhibited a 14.2%-87.14% susceptibility spectrum, whereas ST1139, ST1487, ST10, and ST206 did not lyse, suggesting the presence of more resistant STs. Future studies are warranted to identify the reasons behind this resistance and address it. Ultimately, this study will aid in developing focused treatments to address these pressing global health issues.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Foodborne pathogens and disease\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Foodborne pathogens and disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2024.0023\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foodborne pathogens and disease","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2024.0023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

耐碳青霉烯类大肠杆菌(CREC)是对公共卫生的全球性威胁,因此迫切需要替代治疗方案。噬菌体已成为抗击 CREC 感染的有望候选药物。本研究旨在通过评估韩国大邱地区分离的耐多药(MDR)大肠杆菌对碳青霉烯类药物的耐药性,并利用噬菌体敏感性谱分析其序列类型(ST),从而研究 CREC 中噬菌体敏感性的遗传基础。在分离出的 60 株 MDR 大肠杆菌中,80.4% 被鉴定为 CREC,其中 77.0% 对亚胺培南耐药,66.6% 对美罗培南耐药。此外,还从医院污水中分离出了 70 个大肠杆菌噬菌体,并针对这 60 个大肠杆菌分离物进行了评估。这些噬菌体的溶菌活性为 33%-60%,平均滴度从 5.6 × 1012 到 2.4 × 1013 PFU/mL(菌斑形成单位)不等。此外,对细菌分离物进行的多焦点序列分型(MLST)分析发现了 14 个不同的 ST,其中大部分属于 ST131、ST410 和 ST648。值得注意的是,ST73、ST13003、ST648、ST2311、ST167、ST405、ST607、ST7962 和 ST131 的噬菌体药敏谱存在显著差异。因此,分离出的噬菌体能有效裂解 CREC 分离物,尤其是具有临床优势 ST 的分离物。相反,ST410 显示出 14.2%-87.14% 的敏感性谱,而 ST1139、ST1487、ST10 和 ST206 却不能裂解,这表明存在抗性更强的 ST。今后有必要开展研究,找出耐药性背后的原因并加以解决。最终,这项研究将有助于开发有针对性的治疗方法,以解决这些紧迫的全球健康问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Therapeutic Phage Candidates for Targeting Prevalent Sequence Types of Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli.

Carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC) is a global threat to public health; therefore, alternative treatment options are urgently needed. Bacteriophages have emerged as promising candidates for combating CREC infections. This study aimed to investigate the genetic basis of phage sensitivity in CREC by evaluating carbapenem resistance among multidrug-resistant (MDR) E. coli isolated in Daegu, South Korea and analyzing their sequence types (STs) with phage susceptibility spectra. Among the 60 MDR E. coli isolates, 80.4% were identified as CREC, with 77.0% demonstrating resistance to imipenem and 66.6% to meropenem. Moreover, 70 lytic E. coli bacteriophages were isolated from hospital sewage water and evaluated against those 60 E. coli isolates. The phages exhibited lytic activity of 33%-60%, with average titers ranging from 5.6 × 1012 to 2.4 × 1013 PFU/mL (Plaque-Forming Unit). Furthermore, multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis of the bacterial isolates revealed 14 distinct STs, mostly belonging to ST131, ST410, and ST648. Notably, the phage susceptibility spectra of ST73, ST13003, ST648, ST2311, ST167, ST405, ST607, ST7962, and ST131 were significantly different. Thus, the isolated phages can effectively lyse CREC isolates, particularly those with clinically dominant STs. Conversely, ST410 exhibited a 14.2%-87.14% susceptibility spectrum, whereas ST1139, ST1487, ST10, and ST206 did not lyse, suggesting the presence of more resistant STs. Future studies are warranted to identify the reasons behind this resistance and address it. Ultimately, this study will aid in developing focused treatments to address these pressing global health issues.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Foodborne pathogens and disease
Foodborne pathogens and disease 医学-食品科技
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
80
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Foodborne Pathogens and Disease is one of the most inclusive scientific publications on the many disciplines that contribute to food safety. Spanning an array of issues from "farm-to-fork," the Journal bridges the gap between science and policy to reduce the burden of foodborne illness worldwide. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease coverage includes: Agroterrorism Safety of organically grown and genetically modified foods Emerging pathogens Emergence of drug resistance Methods and technology for rapid and accurate detection Strategies to destroy or control foodborne pathogens Novel strategies for the prevention and control of plant and animal diseases that impact food safety Biosecurity issues and the implications of new regulatory guidelines Impact of changing lifestyles and consumer demands on food safety.
期刊最新文献
Therapeutic Phage Candidates for Targeting Prevalent Sequence Types of Carbapenem-Resistant Escherichia coli. Effects of Akkermansia muciniphila on Gut Morphology, Antioxidant Indices, and Gut Microbiome of Mice Under Heat Stress. Estimating Salmonella Typhimurium Growth on Chicken Breast Fillets Under Simulated Less-Than-Truckload Dynamic Temperature Abuse. Sample Type and Processing Plant Differences in the Proportion of Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli O157 and Non-O157 Serogroups in Feces and on Hides of Cull Dairy Cattle at Slaughter. Quantitative Detection of the CP4-EPSPS Protein in Genetically Modified Soybeans Using a Novel Fluorescence Immunoassay Assay.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1