多位神经病学专家和神经病学住院医师对肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者肩臂无力体征适用性的评估:单中心研究。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Muscle & Nerve Pub Date : 2024-07-24 DOI:10.1002/mus.28216
Yui Sanpei, Keita Yasuda, Yoshiko Takahashi, Akira Hanazono, Masashiro Sugawara, Katsunori Iijima
{"title":"多位神经病学专家和神经病学住院医师对肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者肩臂无力体征适用性的评估:单中心研究。","authors":"Yui Sanpei, Keita Yasuda, Yoshiko Takahashi, Akira Hanazono, Masashiro Sugawara, Katsunori Iijima","doi":"10.1002/mus.28216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) exhibits selective muscle weakness. The weak shoulder and arm sparing signs, assessed by a single experienced neurologist, have been reported to be superior to previous signs in sensitivity and specificity. However, it is unknown whether the same results are observed when assessed by multiple neurologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects were retrospectively identified from our department's inpatient database from 2014 to 2023. Medical Research Council (MRC) scores of the deltoid (Del), biceps brachii (BB), triceps brachii (TB), and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles were evaluated. The weak shoulder sign was defined as positive when Del was weaker than BB and TB. The arm sparing sign was defined as positive when both Del and FDI were weaker than BB and TB. Sensitivity was analyzed in all ALS patients and in subgroups based on the region of symptom onset, presence or absence of upper motor neuron (UMN) signs, and the Japanese ALS Severity Classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients with ALS were identified. Eight neurologists and three neurology residents evaluated each patient's MRC scores. The weak shoulder and arm sparing signs were observed in 72% and 48% of patients, respectively, with no significant difference in sensitivity across patient subgroups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The weak shoulder and arm sparing signs showed high and moderate sensitivity, respectively, consistent with a previous report, even when evaluated by multiple examiners. This expands the clinical utility and increases the reliability of these signs, potentially contributing to accurate ALS diagnosis when combined with other clinical features and objective assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":18968,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & Nerve","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the applicability of weak shoulder and arm sparing signs in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis by multiple neurologists and neurology residents: A single-center study.\",\"authors\":\"Yui Sanpei, Keita Yasuda, Yoshiko Takahashi, Akira Hanazono, Masashiro Sugawara, Katsunori Iijima\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mus.28216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) exhibits selective muscle weakness. The weak shoulder and arm sparing signs, assessed by a single experienced neurologist, have been reported to be superior to previous signs in sensitivity and specificity. However, it is unknown whether the same results are observed when assessed by multiple neurologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects were retrospectively identified from our department's inpatient database from 2014 to 2023. Medical Research Council (MRC) scores of the deltoid (Del), biceps brachii (BB), triceps brachii (TB), and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles were evaluated. The weak shoulder sign was defined as positive when Del was weaker than BB and TB. The arm sparing sign was defined as positive when both Del and FDI were weaker than BB and TB. Sensitivity was analyzed in all ALS patients and in subgroups based on the region of symptom onset, presence or absence of upper motor neuron (UMN) signs, and the Japanese ALS Severity Classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-one patients with ALS were identified. Eight neurologists and three neurology residents evaluated each patient's MRC scores. The weak shoulder and arm sparing signs were observed in 72% and 48% of patients, respectively, with no significant difference in sensitivity across patient subgroups.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The weak shoulder and arm sparing signs showed high and moderate sensitivity, respectively, consistent with a previous report, even when evaluated by multiple examiners. This expands the clinical utility and increases the reliability of these signs, potentially contributing to accurate ALS diagnosis when combined with other clinical features and objective assessments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Muscle & Nerve\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Muscle & Nerve\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28216\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28216","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言/目的:肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)表现为选择性肌无力。据报道,由一名经验丰富的神经科医生评估的肩臂无力体征在敏感性和特异性方面优于以往的体征。然而,由多名神经科医生进行评估是否能观察到相同的结果,目前尚不得而知:方法:从我科 2014 年至 2023 年的住院患者数据库中回顾性地确定受试者。对三角肌(Del)、肱二头肌(BB)、肱三头肌(TB)和第一背侧骨间肌(FDI)的医学研究委员会(MRC)评分进行了评估。当 Del 的力量弱于 BB 和 TB 时,肩部无力征被定义为阳性。当 Del 和 FDI 的力量均弱于 BB 和 TB 时,手臂疏松征被定义为阳性。分析了所有 ALS 患者的灵敏度,以及根据症状发作区域、有无上运动神经元(UMN)体征和日本 ALS 严重程度分类对亚组患者的灵敏度:共发现 71 名 ALS 患者。八位神经科医生和三位神经科住院医生对每位患者的 MRC 评分进行了评估。分别有 72% 和 48% 的患者观察到了肩弱和臂展体征,不同亚组患者的敏感性无显著差异:讨论:肩弱体征和手臂疏松体征分别显示出较高和中等的灵敏度,这与之前的报告一致,即使由多名检查人员进行评估也是如此。这扩大了这些体征的临床实用性并提高了其可靠性,当与其他临床特征和客观评估相结合时,可能有助于准确诊断 ALS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the applicability of weak shoulder and arm sparing signs in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis by multiple neurologists and neurology residents: A single-center study.

Introduction/aims: Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) exhibits selective muscle weakness. The weak shoulder and arm sparing signs, assessed by a single experienced neurologist, have been reported to be superior to previous signs in sensitivity and specificity. However, it is unknown whether the same results are observed when assessed by multiple neurologists.

Methods: Subjects were retrospectively identified from our department's inpatient database from 2014 to 2023. Medical Research Council (MRC) scores of the deltoid (Del), biceps brachii (BB), triceps brachii (TB), and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscles were evaluated. The weak shoulder sign was defined as positive when Del was weaker than BB and TB. The arm sparing sign was defined as positive when both Del and FDI were weaker than BB and TB. Sensitivity was analyzed in all ALS patients and in subgroups based on the region of symptom onset, presence or absence of upper motor neuron (UMN) signs, and the Japanese ALS Severity Classification.

Results: Seventy-one patients with ALS were identified. Eight neurologists and three neurology residents evaluated each patient's MRC scores. The weak shoulder and arm sparing signs were observed in 72% and 48% of patients, respectively, with no significant difference in sensitivity across patient subgroups.

Discussion: The weak shoulder and arm sparing signs showed high and moderate sensitivity, respectively, consistent with a previous report, even when evaluated by multiple examiners. This expands the clinical utility and increases the reliability of these signs, potentially contributing to accurate ALS diagnosis when combined with other clinical features and objective assessments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Muscle & Nerve
Muscle & Nerve 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Muscle & Nerve is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions, in both health and disease, concerning studies of the muscle, the neuromuscular junction, the peripheral motor, sensory and autonomic neurons, and the central nervous system where the behavior of the peripheral nervous system is clarified. Appearing monthly, Muscle & Nerve publishes clinical studies and clinically relevant research reports in the fields of anatomy, biochemistry, cell biology, electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, toxicology, and virology. The Journal welcomes articles and reports on basic clinical electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis. We expedite some papers dealing with timely topics to keep up with the fast-moving pace of science, based on the referees'' recommendation.
期刊最新文献
Lower limb nerve ultrasound: A four-way comparison of acquired and inherited axonopathy, inherited neuronopathy and healthy controls. Test-retest and inter-rater reliability of two devices measuring tactile mechanical detection thresholds in healthy adults: Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments and the cutaneous mechanical stimulator. Neuroma morphology: A macroscopic classification system. Access for ALL in ALS: A large-scale, inclusive, collaborative consortium to unlock the molecular and genetic mechanisms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The impact of genotype on age at loss of ambulation in individuals with Duchenne muscular dystrophy treated with corticosteroids: A single‐center study of 555 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1