美洲国家免疫技术咨询小组的现状:改进建议。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-07-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.26633/RPSP.2024.63
Miguel Betancourt-Cravioto, Ruby Trejo Varón, Francisco Becerra-Posada, Carlos Espinal
{"title":"美洲国家免疫技术咨询小组的现状:改进建议。","authors":"Miguel Betancourt-Cravioto, Ruby Trejo Varón, Francisco Becerra-Posada, Carlos Espinal","doi":"10.26633/RPSP.2024.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the structure and operation of national immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs) in Latin America and the Caribbean and to make recommendations for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of six current and eight former NITAG members representing 12 countries in the region were invited in 2022 to answer a web-based questionnaire on NITAG structure, organization, and procedures. The questionnaire used indicators similar to those in the Joint Reporting Form on Immunization. Participants were also asked about the role their NITAGs played in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) immunization policies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Brazil, Dominican Republic, and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) reported not having an active NITAG. The nine active NITAGs are structured and organized according to World Health Organization and Pan American Health Organization recommendations, with variations between countries. Most NITAGs include representatives of the five recommended medical specialties with the participation of additional members possible. Only Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Mexico have no explicit policy for managing members' potential conflicts of interest. All NITAGs have an exclusively technical advisory role and generally meet once a quarter. Usually, NITAGs are asked by health ministries to analyze issues and make recommendations. All NITAGs, except for Peru's, actively participated in supporting decision-making for immunization policy on COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NITAGs have successfully supported vaccine policy-making through evidence-based recommendations. However, improvement in their structure, operation, and transparency is needed to help them keep up with the rapidly evolving field of immunization. Research on the impact of NITAGs is important to support the development of recommendations for improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":21264,"journal":{"name":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","volume":"48 ","pages":"e63"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265310/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Status of the national immunization technical advisory groups in the Americas: recommendations for improvement.\",\"authors\":\"Miguel Betancourt-Cravioto, Ruby Trejo Varón, Francisco Becerra-Posada, Carlos Espinal\",\"doi\":\"10.26633/RPSP.2024.63\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the structure and operation of national immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs) in Latin America and the Caribbean and to make recommendations for improvement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of six current and eight former NITAG members representing 12 countries in the region were invited in 2022 to answer a web-based questionnaire on NITAG structure, organization, and procedures. The questionnaire used indicators similar to those in the Joint Reporting Form on Immunization. Participants were also asked about the role their NITAGs played in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) immunization policies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Brazil, Dominican Republic, and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) reported not having an active NITAG. The nine active NITAGs are structured and organized according to World Health Organization and Pan American Health Organization recommendations, with variations between countries. Most NITAGs include representatives of the five recommended medical specialties with the participation of additional members possible. Only Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Mexico have no explicit policy for managing members' potential conflicts of interest. All NITAGs have an exclusively technical advisory role and generally meet once a quarter. Usually, NITAGs are asked by health ministries to analyze issues and make recommendations. All NITAGs, except for Peru's, actively participated in supporting decision-making for immunization policy on COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NITAGs have successfully supported vaccine policy-making through evidence-based recommendations. However, improvement in their structure, operation, and transparency is needed to help them keep up with the rapidly evolving field of immunization. Research on the impact of NITAGs is important to support the development of recommendations for improvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"48 \",\"pages\":\"e63\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265310/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2024.63\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Panamericana De Salud Publica-pan American Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2024.63","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估拉丁美洲和加勒比地区国家免疫技术咨询小组(NITAG)的结构和运作情况,并提出改进建议:评估拉丁美洲和加勒比地区国家免疫技术咨询组(NITAG)的结构和运作情况,并提出改进建议:2022 年,我们邀请了代表该地区 12 个国家的 6 名现任和 8 名前任国家免疫技术咨询小组成员回答有关国家免疫技术咨询小组结构、组织和程序的网络问卷。问卷中使用的指标与免疫接种联合报告表中的指标类似。参与者还被问及他们的 NITAG 在 2019 年冠状病毒疾病(COVID-19)免疫政策中发挥的作用:结果:巴西、多米尼加共和国和委内瑞拉玻利瓦尔共和国报告称没有活跃的 NITAG。九个活跃的 NITAG 是根据世界卫生组织和泛美卫生组织的建议建立和组织的,但各国之间存在差异。大多数 NITAG 包括推荐的五个医学专业的代表,也可能有其他成员参加。只有多民族玻利维亚国和墨西哥没有管理成员潜在利益冲突的明确政策。所有 NITAG 只发挥技术咨询作用,一般每季度召开一次会议。通常,卫生部会要求 NITAG 分析问题并提出建议。除秘鲁外,所有 NITAG 都积极参与支持有关 COVID-19 的免疫政策决策:结论:NITAG 通过循证建议成功地支持了疫苗政策的制定。然而,需要改进其结构、运作和透明度,以帮助它们跟上快速发展的免疫领域。对 NITAG 的影响进行研究对于支持制定改进建议非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Status of the national immunization technical advisory groups in the Americas: recommendations for improvement.

Objectives: To evaluate the structure and operation of national immunization technical advisory groups (NITAGs) in Latin America and the Caribbean and to make recommendations for improvement.

Methods: A convenience sample of six current and eight former NITAG members representing 12 countries in the region were invited in 2022 to answer a web-based questionnaire on NITAG structure, organization, and procedures. The questionnaire used indicators similar to those in the Joint Reporting Form on Immunization. Participants were also asked about the role their NITAGs played in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) immunization policies.

Results: Brazil, Dominican Republic, and Venezuela (Bolivarian Republic of) reported not having an active NITAG. The nine active NITAGs are structured and organized according to World Health Organization and Pan American Health Organization recommendations, with variations between countries. Most NITAGs include representatives of the five recommended medical specialties with the participation of additional members possible. Only Bolivia (Plurinational State of) and Mexico have no explicit policy for managing members' potential conflicts of interest. All NITAGs have an exclusively technical advisory role and generally meet once a quarter. Usually, NITAGs are asked by health ministries to analyze issues and make recommendations. All NITAGs, except for Peru's, actively participated in supporting decision-making for immunization policy on COVID-19.

Conclusions: NITAGs have successfully supported vaccine policy-making through evidence-based recommendations. However, improvement in their structure, operation, and transparency is needed to help them keep up with the rapidly evolving field of immunization. Research on the impact of NITAGs is important to support the development of recommendations for improvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Towards 2030: ministerial agreements on information systems and digital transformation for resilient health systems. Mapping priority areas for measles surveillance: stratifying reintroduction and transmission risk in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. [Key clinical manifestations to differentiate Oropouche fever from dengue and other arboviral diseases: a living systematic reviewRevisão sistemática viva das manifestações clínicas da febre do Oropouche: características-chave para diferenciá-la da dengue e de outras arboviroses]. [Strengthening doctoral programs in nursing based on health care needsFortalecimento dos programas de doutorado em enfermagem com base nas necessidades de saúde]. [Building Health Capacities Through the HEARTS Initiative in the Dominican RepublicDesenvolvimento de capacidades em saúde por meio da iniciativa HEARTS na República Dominicana].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1