开发并验证用于测量疫苗接种微阵列贴片的安全性、可用性和可接受性的量表:研究方案。

Q2 Medicine Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy Pub Date : 2024-06-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/25151355241263560
Matthew N Berger, Cristyn Davies, Erin Mathieu, Ramon Z Shaban, Shopna Bag, S Rachel Skinner
{"title":"开发并验证用于测量疫苗接种微阵列贴片的安全性、可用性和可接受性的量表:研究方案。","authors":"Matthew N Berger, Cristyn Davies, Erin Mathieu, Ramon Z Shaban, Shopna Bag, S Rachel Skinner","doi":"10.1177/25151355241263560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaccination is a fundamental tenet of public and population health. Several barriers to vaccine uptake exist, exacerbated post-COVID-19, including misconceptions about vaccine efficacy and safety, vaccine hesitancy, vaccine inequity, costs, religious beliefs, and insufficient education and guidance for healthcare professionals. Vaccine uptake may be aided using microarray patches (MAPs) due to reduced pain, no hypodermic needle, enhanced thermostability, and potential for self and lay administration.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This protocol outlines the development of a scale that aims to accurately measure the perceived safety, usability, and acceptability of MAPs for vaccination among laypeople, MAP recipients, clinicians, and parents or guardians of children.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This study will follow three phases of scale development and validation, including (1) item development, (2) scale development, and (3) scale evaluation. Inductive (interviews) and deductive methods (literature searches) will be used to develop scale items, which experts from target populations will assess through an online survey. Cognitive interviews will be conducted to observe their processes of answering the draft survey. Thematic analysis will be conducted to analyse qualitative data. Lastly, four surveys will be administered online to our target populations over two time points to determine their repeatability. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, Cronbach's alpha, and construct validity will be performed.</p><p><strong>Ethics: </strong>This study was approved by Metro South Health (HREC/2021/QMS/81653) and Western Sydney Local Health District (2023/ETH00705) Human Research Ethics Committees.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The scale will support a standardised approach to assessing the social and behavioural aspects of MAP vaccines, enabling comparison of outcomes across studies. Once validated, this scale will assist vaccination programmes in developing effective strategies for integrating MAPs and overcoming barriers to vaccination. This includes improving vaccine equity and accessibility, especially in lower- and middle-income countries and rural or remote locations.</p>","PeriodicalId":33285,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265248/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing and validating a scale to measure the perceptions of safety, usability and acceptability of microarray patches for vaccination: a study protocol.\",\"authors\":\"Matthew N Berger, Cristyn Davies, Erin Mathieu, Ramon Z Shaban, Shopna Bag, S Rachel Skinner\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25151355241263560\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vaccination is a fundamental tenet of public and population health. Several barriers to vaccine uptake exist, exacerbated post-COVID-19, including misconceptions about vaccine efficacy and safety, vaccine hesitancy, vaccine inequity, costs, religious beliefs, and insufficient education and guidance for healthcare professionals. Vaccine uptake may be aided using microarray patches (MAPs) due to reduced pain, no hypodermic needle, enhanced thermostability, and potential for self and lay administration.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This protocol outlines the development of a scale that aims to accurately measure the perceived safety, usability, and acceptability of MAPs for vaccination among laypeople, MAP recipients, clinicians, and parents or guardians of children.</p><p><strong>Methods and analysis: </strong>This study will follow three phases of scale development and validation, including (1) item development, (2) scale development, and (3) scale evaluation. Inductive (interviews) and deductive methods (literature searches) will be used to develop scale items, which experts from target populations will assess through an online survey. Cognitive interviews will be conducted to observe their processes of answering the draft survey. Thematic analysis will be conducted to analyse qualitative data. Lastly, four surveys will be administered online to our target populations over two time points to determine their repeatability. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, Cronbach's alpha, and construct validity will be performed.</p><p><strong>Ethics: </strong>This study was approved by Metro South Health (HREC/2021/QMS/81653) and Western Sydney Local Health District (2023/ETH00705) Human Research Ethics Committees.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The scale will support a standardised approach to assessing the social and behavioural aspects of MAP vaccines, enabling comparison of outcomes across studies. Once validated, this scale will assist vaccination programmes in developing effective strategies for integrating MAPs and overcoming barriers to vaccination. This includes improving vaccine equity and accessibility, especially in lower- and middle-income countries and rural or remote locations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":33285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11265248/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355241263560\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25151355241263560","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:疫苗接种是公共卫生和人口健康的基本原则。疫苗接种存在一些障碍,COVID-19 后这些障碍更加严重,包括对疫苗有效性和安全性的误解、疫苗接种犹豫不决、疫苗接种不公平、成本、宗教信仰以及对医疗保健专业人员的教育和指导不足。使用微阵列贴片(MAPs)可减少疼痛、无需皮下注射针头、提高热稳定性,并可用于自我管理和非专业人员管理,从而有助于疫苗的吸收:本方案概述了一个量表的开发过程,该量表旨在精确测量非专业人士、微阵列贴片接种者、临床医生以及儿童家长或监护人对微阵列贴片接种安全性、可用性和可接受性的看法:本研究将分三个阶段进行量表开发和验证,包括 (1) 项目开发、(2) 量表开发和 (3) 量表评估。将采用归纳法(访谈)和演绎法(文献检索)开发量表项目,目标人群的专家将通过在线调查对这些项目进行评估。将进行认知访谈,观察他们回答调查草稿的过程。将采用主题分析法对定性数据进行分析。最后,我们将在两个时间点对目标人群进行四次在线调查,以确定其可重复性。此外,还将进行探索性和确认性因素分析、克朗巴赫α分析以及构建有效性分析:本研究已获得大南部卫生局(HREC/2021/QMS/81653)和西悉尼地方卫生区(2023/ETH00705)人类研究伦理委员会的批准:该量表将为评估 MAP 疫苗的社会和行为方面的标准化方法提供支持,从而能够对不同研究的结果进行比较。一旦通过验证,该量表将有助于疫苗接种计划制定有效战略,整合 MAPs 并克服疫苗接种障碍。这包括提高疫苗的公平性和可及性,尤其是在中低收入国家和农村或偏远地区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developing and validating a scale to measure the perceptions of safety, usability and acceptability of microarray patches for vaccination: a study protocol.

Background: Vaccination is a fundamental tenet of public and population health. Several barriers to vaccine uptake exist, exacerbated post-COVID-19, including misconceptions about vaccine efficacy and safety, vaccine hesitancy, vaccine inequity, costs, religious beliefs, and insufficient education and guidance for healthcare professionals. Vaccine uptake may be aided using microarray patches (MAPs) due to reduced pain, no hypodermic needle, enhanced thermostability, and potential for self and lay administration.

Objectives: This protocol outlines the development of a scale that aims to accurately measure the perceived safety, usability, and acceptability of MAPs for vaccination among laypeople, MAP recipients, clinicians, and parents or guardians of children.

Methods and analysis: This study will follow three phases of scale development and validation, including (1) item development, (2) scale development, and (3) scale evaluation. Inductive (interviews) and deductive methods (literature searches) will be used to develop scale items, which experts from target populations will assess through an online survey. Cognitive interviews will be conducted to observe their processes of answering the draft survey. Thematic analysis will be conducted to analyse qualitative data. Lastly, four surveys will be administered online to our target populations over two time points to determine their repeatability. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, Cronbach's alpha, and construct validity will be performed.

Ethics: This study was approved by Metro South Health (HREC/2021/QMS/81653) and Western Sydney Local Health District (2023/ETH00705) Human Research Ethics Committees.

Discussion: The scale will support a standardised approach to assessing the social and behavioural aspects of MAP vaccines, enabling comparison of outcomes across studies. Once validated, this scale will assist vaccination programmes in developing effective strategies for integrating MAPs and overcoming barriers to vaccination. This includes improving vaccine equity and accessibility, especially in lower- and middle-income countries and rural or remote locations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy
Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines and Immunotherapy Medicine-Pharmacology (medical)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Knowledge, attitude, and acceptance of COVID-19 vaccine in pregnant women. Comparative 60-day effectiveness of bivalent versus monovalent mRNA vaccines in Shelby County: a population-level analysis. Vaccination practices and knowledge among adults with hemoglobinopathies in Greece: a nationwide survey. Media literacy: exploring the key to social media influences for wise parental decision-making on vaccines. Monoclonal IgY antibodies: advancements and limitations for immunodiagnosis and immunotherapy applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1