调整干预措施,消除安宁疗护中的疼痛管理障碍:为痴呆症护理人员的 EMPOWER-D 提供依据的形成性研究。

IF 1.1 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Palliative medicine reports Pub Date : 2024-07-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/pmr.2024.0024
Karla T Washington, Morgan L Van Vleck, Todd D Becker, George Demiris, Debra Parker Oliver, Paul E Tatum, Jacquelyn J Benson, John G Cagle
{"title":"调整干预措施,消除安宁疗护中的疼痛管理障碍:为痴呆症护理人员的 EMPOWER-D 提供依据的形成性研究。","authors":"Karla T Washington, Morgan L Van Vleck, Todd D Becker, George Demiris, Debra Parker Oliver, Paul E Tatum, Jacquelyn J Benson, John G Cagle","doi":"10.1089/pmr.2024.0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nearly half of more than 1.7 million older Americans who receive hospice care each year have a primary or comorbid diagnosis of dementia. Pain is often undertreated in this patient population owing to myriad factors, including unmet informational needs among family caregivers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to inform the adaptation of a pain education intervention for hospice family caregivers to the context of dementia by eliciting feedback on the educational content covered in adapted intervention materials.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a multimethod, formative research study to inform the adaptation of an existing, evidence-based intervention.</p><p><strong>Setting/subjects: </strong>The study included a purposively recruited sample (<i>n</i> = 33) of hospice professionals (<i>n</i> = 18) and family caregivers (<i>n</i> = 15) from across the United States.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Participants quantitatively rated the importance of each of the eight pain concerns presented in the adapted intervention materials (1 = not important to 3 = very important) and provided qualitative feedback via Zoom interview on the acceptability, clinical accuracy, and potential benefits of the adapted content. We analyzed quantitative data via descriptive statistics and qualitative data via content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants rated the adapted educational content as highly important (range<sub>mean</sub> = 2.56-3.00), particularly regarding concerns about caregivers' pain assessment, communicating with the hospice team about pain, and addressing misinformation regarding pain medication outcomes. Participants also provided suggestions to strengthen specific educational messages to improve comprehension and uptake.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings support the continued development and testing of the adapted intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":74394,"journal":{"name":"Palliative medicine reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262577/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adapting an Intervention to Address Barriers to Pain Management in Hospice: Formative Research to Inform EMPOWER-D for Dementia Caregivers.\",\"authors\":\"Karla T Washington, Morgan L Van Vleck, Todd D Becker, George Demiris, Debra Parker Oliver, Paul E Tatum, Jacquelyn J Benson, John G Cagle\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/pmr.2024.0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nearly half of more than 1.7 million older Americans who receive hospice care each year have a primary or comorbid diagnosis of dementia. Pain is often undertreated in this patient population owing to myriad factors, including unmet informational needs among family caregivers.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to inform the adaptation of a pain education intervention for hospice family caregivers to the context of dementia by eliciting feedback on the educational content covered in adapted intervention materials.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a multimethod, formative research study to inform the adaptation of an existing, evidence-based intervention.</p><p><strong>Setting/subjects: </strong>The study included a purposively recruited sample (<i>n</i> = 33) of hospice professionals (<i>n</i> = 18) and family caregivers (<i>n</i> = 15) from across the United States.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Participants quantitatively rated the importance of each of the eight pain concerns presented in the adapted intervention materials (1 = not important to 3 = very important) and provided qualitative feedback via Zoom interview on the acceptability, clinical accuracy, and potential benefits of the adapted content. We analyzed quantitative data via descriptive statistics and qualitative data via content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants rated the adapted educational content as highly important (range<sub>mean</sub> = 2.56-3.00), particularly regarding concerns about caregivers' pain assessment, communicating with the hospice team about pain, and addressing misinformation regarding pain medication outcomes. Participants also provided suggestions to strengthen specific educational messages to improve comprehension and uptake.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings support the continued development and testing of the adapted intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative medicine reports\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11262577/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative medicine reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2024.0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative medicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pmr.2024.0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在每年接受安宁疗护的 170 多万美国老年人中,有近一半的人被诊断为主要或合并痴呆症。由于多种因素,包括家庭照护者的信息需求未得到满足,这类患者的疼痛治疗往往不足:我们试图通过征求对改编后干预材料中教育内容的反馈意见,为针对临终关怀家庭照护者的疼痛教育干预措施适应痴呆症的情况提供信息:我们采用多种方法开展了一项形成性研究,为改编现有的循证干预措施提供信息:研究对象包括有目的性地从美国各地招募的安宁疗护专业人士(18 人)和家庭照护者(15 人)样本(33 人):参与者对改编干预材料中提出的八个疼痛问题的重要性进行量化评分(1 = 不重要到 3 = 非常重要),并通过 Zoom 访谈就改编内容的可接受性、临床准确性和潜在益处提供定性反馈。我们通过描述性统计对定量数据进行了分析,通过内容分析对定性数据进行了分析:参与者认为改编后的教育内容非常重要(rangemean = 2.56-3.00),尤其是关于护理人员疼痛评估、与安宁疗护团队就疼痛问题进行沟通以及解决止痛药物治疗效果方面的错误信息等方面的问题。参与者还提出了加强特定教育信息的建议,以提高理解力和接受度:结论:研究结果支持继续开发和测试经调整的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adapting an Intervention to Address Barriers to Pain Management in Hospice: Formative Research to Inform EMPOWER-D for Dementia Caregivers.

Background: Nearly half of more than 1.7 million older Americans who receive hospice care each year have a primary or comorbid diagnosis of dementia. Pain is often undertreated in this patient population owing to myriad factors, including unmet informational needs among family caregivers.

Objective: We sought to inform the adaptation of a pain education intervention for hospice family caregivers to the context of dementia by eliciting feedback on the educational content covered in adapted intervention materials.

Design: We conducted a multimethod, formative research study to inform the adaptation of an existing, evidence-based intervention.

Setting/subjects: The study included a purposively recruited sample (n = 33) of hospice professionals (n = 18) and family caregivers (n = 15) from across the United States.

Measurements: Participants quantitatively rated the importance of each of the eight pain concerns presented in the adapted intervention materials (1 = not important to 3 = very important) and provided qualitative feedback via Zoom interview on the acceptability, clinical accuracy, and potential benefits of the adapted content. We analyzed quantitative data via descriptive statistics and qualitative data via content analysis.

Results: Participants rated the adapted educational content as highly important (rangemean = 2.56-3.00), particularly regarding concerns about caregivers' pain assessment, communicating with the hospice team about pain, and addressing misinformation regarding pain medication outcomes. Participants also provided suggestions to strengthen specific educational messages to improve comprehension and uptake.

Conclusions: Findings support the continued development and testing of the adapted intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Characteristics, Outcomes and Factors for Place of Death in Patients Admitted to Community-Based Palliative Care Services in Shanghai China: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study. Nursing Practices for Dyspnea Management in Patients with Cancer Based on Monthly and Weekly Prognoses: A Multi-Site Cross-Sectional Study of Palliative Care Nurses in Japan. Is a Combination of Six Clinical Tests Useful as a Measure to Predict Short-Term Prognosis in Terminal Cancer Patients? A Prospective Observational Study in a Japanese Palliative Care Unit. The Surprise Question: Not Ready for Prime Time. Use of Nursing Support Among Nurses for Caregiver Burden in Family Caregivers of Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer in Palliative Care Units in Japan: Multisite Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1