Paul Karayiannis , Roslyn Cassidy , Ian Dobie , David Beverland
{"title":"在一家非设计中心对 257 例连续的牛津无骨水泥内侧室膝关节置换术进行长期随访。","authors":"Paul Karayiannis , Roslyn Cassidy , Ian Dobie , David Beverland","doi":"10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This study aimed to review the survivorship, indication for revision and patient reported outcomes for 257 consecutive Oxford cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (OUKA’s) in 238 patients at 12–14 years post-operatively.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients underwent surgery between April 2008 and October 2010 by two non-design surgeons including their learning curve. The 5-year clinical and radiological outcomes have already been reported. Oxford knee scores (OKS) were recorded at 1, 5 and 12–14 years with delayed review a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Revision indication and imaging were reviewed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Revision was required in 28 OUKA’s (10.9%) with a 10-year cumulative survival of 93.0%, reducing to 78.8% at 14 years. 59 patients had died prior to this review and 24 were not contactable. Those not contactable had electronic records reviewed to ensure they did not have a revision elsewhere. Half of the revisions were for progression of lateral compartment arthritis (14/28). Four of 6 cases with a full revision for polyethylene wear may have benefited from a bearing exchange instead. OKSs in non-revised patients were good (median score 38, IQR 30–44) with no significant deterioration noted from 5 to 12–14 years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Cementless OUKA in this series had a long-term survival rate comparable to other OUKA’s outside of the designer centre. OKSs remain good for those patients not revised. Progression of lateral compartment arthritis was the primary reason for revision with no revisions for component loosening or bearing spinout. Ideally UKA patients who experience problems should be under the care of revisions surgeons who perform UKA. Improving patient selection and understanding of the pathophysiology of lateral disease progression, remain crucial to improve the long-term survivorship of OUKA.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56110,"journal":{"name":"Knee","volume":"49 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long term follow up of 257 consecutive cementless Oxford medial compartment knee arthroplasties at a non-designer centre\",\"authors\":\"Paul Karayiannis , Roslyn Cassidy , Ian Dobie , David Beverland\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.knee.2024.07.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>This study aimed to review the survivorship, indication for revision and patient reported outcomes for 257 consecutive Oxford cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (OUKA’s) in 238 patients at 12–14 years post-operatively.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients underwent surgery between April 2008 and October 2010 by two non-design surgeons including their learning curve. The 5-year clinical and radiological outcomes have already been reported. Oxford knee scores (OKS) were recorded at 1, 5 and 12–14 years with delayed review a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Revision indication and imaging were reviewed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Revision was required in 28 OUKA’s (10.9%) with a 10-year cumulative survival of 93.0%, reducing to 78.8% at 14 years. 59 patients had died prior to this review and 24 were not contactable. Those not contactable had electronic records reviewed to ensure they did not have a revision elsewhere. Half of the revisions were for progression of lateral compartment arthritis (14/28). Four of 6 cases with a full revision for polyethylene wear may have benefited from a bearing exchange instead. OKSs in non-revised patients were good (median score 38, IQR 30–44) with no significant deterioration noted from 5 to 12–14 years.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Cementless OUKA in this series had a long-term survival rate comparable to other OUKA’s outside of the designer centre. OKSs remain good for those patients not revised. Progression of lateral compartment arthritis was the primary reason for revision with no revisions for component loosening or bearing spinout. Ideally UKA patients who experience problems should be under the care of revisions surgeons who perform UKA. Improving patient selection and understanding of the pathophysiology of lateral disease progression, remain crucial to improve the long-term survivorship of OUKA.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Knee\",\"volume\":\"49 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Knee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001017\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knee","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968016024001017","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long term follow up of 257 consecutive cementless Oxford medial compartment knee arthroplasties at a non-designer centre
Aims
This study aimed to review the survivorship, indication for revision and patient reported outcomes for 257 consecutive Oxford cementless unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (OUKA’s) in 238 patients at 12–14 years post-operatively.
Methods
Patients underwent surgery between April 2008 and October 2010 by two non-design surgeons including their learning curve. The 5-year clinical and radiological outcomes have already been reported. Oxford knee scores (OKS) were recorded at 1, 5 and 12–14 years with delayed review a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Revision indication and imaging were reviewed.
Results
Revision was required in 28 OUKA’s (10.9%) with a 10-year cumulative survival of 93.0%, reducing to 78.8% at 14 years. 59 patients had died prior to this review and 24 were not contactable. Those not contactable had electronic records reviewed to ensure they did not have a revision elsewhere. Half of the revisions were for progression of lateral compartment arthritis (14/28). Four of 6 cases with a full revision for polyethylene wear may have benefited from a bearing exchange instead. OKSs in non-revised patients were good (median score 38, IQR 30–44) with no significant deterioration noted from 5 to 12–14 years.
Conclusions
Cementless OUKA in this series had a long-term survival rate comparable to other OUKA’s outside of the designer centre. OKSs remain good for those patients not revised. Progression of lateral compartment arthritis was the primary reason for revision with no revisions for component loosening or bearing spinout. Ideally UKA patients who experience problems should be under the care of revisions surgeons who perform UKA. Improving patient selection and understanding of the pathophysiology of lateral disease progression, remain crucial to improve the long-term survivorship of OUKA.
期刊介绍:
The Knee is an international journal publishing studies on the clinical treatment and fundamental biomechanical characteristics of this joint. The aim of the journal is to provide a vehicle relevant to surgeons, biomedical engineers, imaging specialists, materials scientists, rehabilitation personnel and all those with an interest in the knee.
The topics covered include, but are not limited to:
• Anatomy, physiology, morphology and biochemistry;
• Biomechanical studies;
• Advances in the development of prosthetic, orthotic and augmentation devices;
• Imaging and diagnostic techniques;
• Pathology;
• Trauma;
• Surgery;
• Rehabilitation.