莫尔斯锥度种植体上三种不同种植体-基台界面的微生物体外渗漏。

IF 2.5 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Dentistry Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.3390/dj12070226
Ricardo Faria Ribeiro, Victor Barboza da Mata, Lucas de Oliveira Tomaselli, Anselmo Agostinho Simionato, Emerson de Souza Santos, Adriana Cláudia Lapria Faria, Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues, Cássio do Nascimento
{"title":"莫尔斯锥度种植体上三种不同种植体-基台界面的微生物体外渗漏。","authors":"Ricardo Faria Ribeiro, Victor Barboza da Mata, Lucas de Oliveira Tomaselli, Anselmo Agostinho Simionato, Emerson de Souza Santos, Adriana Cláudia Lapria Faria, Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues, Cássio do Nascimento","doi":"10.3390/dj12070226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate microbial leakage by means of genome counts, through the implant-abutment interface in dental implants with different Morse taper abutments. Fifty-six samples were prepared and divided in four groups: CMC TB (14 Cylindrical Implants-14 TiBase Abutments), CMX TB (14 Conical Implants-14 TiBase Abutments), CMX PU (14 Conical Implants-14 Universal Abutment) and CMX U (14 Tapered Implants-14 UCLA Abutments). Assemblies had their interface submerged in saliva as the contaminant. Samples were subjected either to thermomechanical cycling (2 × 10<sup>6</sup> mechanical cycles with frequency of 5 Hz and load of 120 N simultaneously with thermal cycles of 5-55 °C) or thermal cycling (5-55 °C). After cycling, the contents from the inner parts of assemblies were collected and analyzed using the Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization technique. Significant differences in the total genome counts were found after both thermomechanical or thermal cycling: CMX U > CMX PU > CMX TB > CMC TB. There were also significant differences in individual bacterial counts in each of the groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Irrespective of mechanical cycling, the type of abutment seems to influence not only the total microbial leakage through the interface, but also seems to significantly reflect differences considering individual target species.</p>","PeriodicalId":11269,"journal":{"name":"Dentistry Journal","volume":"12 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11275855/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microbial Leakage through Three Different Implant-Abutment Interfaces on Morse Taper Implants In Vitro.\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo Faria Ribeiro, Victor Barboza da Mata, Lucas de Oliveira Tomaselli, Anselmo Agostinho Simionato, Emerson de Souza Santos, Adriana Cláudia Lapria Faria, Renata Cristina Silveira Rodrigues, Cássio do Nascimento\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/dj12070226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate microbial leakage by means of genome counts, through the implant-abutment interface in dental implants with different Morse taper abutments. Fifty-six samples were prepared and divided in four groups: CMC TB (14 Cylindrical Implants-14 TiBase Abutments), CMX TB (14 Conical Implants-14 TiBase Abutments), CMX PU (14 Conical Implants-14 Universal Abutment) and CMX U (14 Tapered Implants-14 UCLA Abutments). Assemblies had their interface submerged in saliva as the contaminant. Samples were subjected either to thermomechanical cycling (2 × 10<sup>6</sup> mechanical cycles with frequency of 5 Hz and load of 120 N simultaneously with thermal cycles of 5-55 °C) or thermal cycling (5-55 °C). After cycling, the contents from the inner parts of assemblies were collected and analyzed using the Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization technique. Significant differences in the total genome counts were found after both thermomechanical or thermal cycling: CMX U > CMX PU > CMX TB > CMC TB. There were also significant differences in individual bacterial counts in each of the groups (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Irrespective of mechanical cycling, the type of abutment seems to influence not only the total microbial leakage through the interface, but also seems to significantly reflect differences considering individual target species.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11275855/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dentistry Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12070226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dentistry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12070226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的目的是通过基因组计数来评估微生物通过带有不同莫尔斯锥度基台的种植体与基台界面的渗漏情况。研究人员制备了 56 个样本,并将其分为四组:CMC TB(14 个圆柱形种植体-14 个钛基台)、CMX TB(14 个锥形种植体-14 个钛基台)、CMX PU(14 个锥形种植体-14 个通用基台)和 CMX U(14 个锥形种植体-14 个 UCLA 基台)。组件的界面浸没在唾液中作为污染物。对样品进行热机械循环(2×106 次机械循环,频率为 5 Hz,载荷为 120 N,同时进行 5-55 °C 的热循环)或热循环(5-55 °C)。循环结束后,收集组装体内部的内容物,并使用棋盘式 DNA-DNA 杂交技术进行分析。在热机械或热循环后,发现基因组总数存在显著差异:cmx u > cmx pu > cmx tb > cmc tb。各组的单个细菌数量也存在明显差异(p < 0.05)。无论机械循环如何,基台的类型似乎不仅会影响通过界面的微生物总渗漏量,而且似乎也会显著反映个别目标物种的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Microbial Leakage through Three Different Implant-Abutment Interfaces on Morse Taper Implants In Vitro.

The objective of this study was to evaluate microbial leakage by means of genome counts, through the implant-abutment interface in dental implants with different Morse taper abutments. Fifty-six samples were prepared and divided in four groups: CMC TB (14 Cylindrical Implants-14 TiBase Abutments), CMX TB (14 Conical Implants-14 TiBase Abutments), CMX PU (14 Conical Implants-14 Universal Abutment) and CMX U (14 Tapered Implants-14 UCLA Abutments). Assemblies had their interface submerged in saliva as the contaminant. Samples were subjected either to thermomechanical cycling (2 × 106 mechanical cycles with frequency of 5 Hz and load of 120 N simultaneously with thermal cycles of 5-55 °C) or thermal cycling (5-55 °C). After cycling, the contents from the inner parts of assemblies were collected and analyzed using the Checkerboard DNA-DNA hybridization technique. Significant differences in the total genome counts were found after both thermomechanical or thermal cycling: CMX U > CMX PU > CMX TB > CMC TB. There were also significant differences in individual bacterial counts in each of the groups (p < 0.05). Irrespective of mechanical cycling, the type of abutment seems to influence not only the total microbial leakage through the interface, but also seems to significantly reflect differences considering individual target species.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dentistry Journal
Dentistry Journal Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
213
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Home Biofilm Management in Orthodontic Aligners: A Systematic Review. In Vitro Research Methods Used to Evaluate Shaping Ability of Rotary Endodontic Files-A Literature Review. Accuracy and Efficiency of the Surgical-Guide-Assisted Fiber Post Removal Technique for Anterior Teeth: An Ex Vivo Study. Correlation between Periodontitis and Onset of Alzheimer's Disease: A Literature Review. The Harmful Effects of Welding Fumes on Human Dental Enamel-A Microhardness Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1