长期 COVID-19 对早期语言发展的影响:纵向研究

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Early human development Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106081
Jovana Pejovic, Cátia Severino, Marina Vigário, Sónia Frota
{"title":"长期 COVID-19 对早期语言发展的影响:纵向研究","authors":"Jovana Pejovic,&nbsp;Cátia Severino,&nbsp;Marina Vigário,&nbsp;Sónia Frota","doi":"10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is growing evidence that COVID-19 brought changes that immediately affected early language development. Little is known for how long these COVID-19 related changes shaped development. The current study systematically and longitudinally addressed this issue, following up children's language development throughout the first 2.5 years.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The present study follows up on the sample from Frota et al. (2022), which demonstrated that 7–9-month-old infants born and raised during the pandemic do not segment words unlike pre-pandemic peers. Four studies were conducted: (1) word segmentation task at 12 months of age (N<sub>pandemic</sub> = 15); (2) word learning task at 20 months of age (N<sub>pandemic</sub> = 20); (3) language and communication development up to 30 months of age, via CDI and CSBS parental reports (N<sub>pandemic</sub> ranged 25–74); (4) overall development at 30 months of age using the Griffiths Developmental Scales (N<sub>pandemic</sub> = 16).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The pandemic sample consistently underperformed in all four studies in comparison to pre-pandemic data. There was no evidence of developed word segmentation abilities at 12 months of age, and no successful word learning at 20 months of age. Lexical development between 12 and 24 months of age was lower than in the pre-pandemic sample, while social communication did not seem to be affected. At 30 months of age, the pandemic sample showed lower scores and lower mental age on the Language and Communication Griffiths' subscale, in comparison to the pre-pandemic data.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Infants born and raised during the pandemic have a poorer language development, that persists at least until 30 months of age.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11435,"journal":{"name":"Early human development","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 106081"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378224001506/pdfft?md5=380499cb3d967e9e89d651eda870e356&pid=1-s2.0-S0378378224001506-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prolonged COVID-19 related effects on early language development: A longitudinal study\",\"authors\":\"Jovana Pejovic,&nbsp;Cátia Severino,&nbsp;Marina Vigário,&nbsp;Sónia Frota\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2024.106081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>There is growing evidence that COVID-19 brought changes that immediately affected early language development. Little is known for how long these COVID-19 related changes shaped development. The current study systematically and longitudinally addressed this issue, following up children's language development throughout the first 2.5 years.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The present study follows up on the sample from Frota et al. (2022), which demonstrated that 7–9-month-old infants born and raised during the pandemic do not segment words unlike pre-pandemic peers. Four studies were conducted: (1) word segmentation task at 12 months of age (N<sub>pandemic</sub> = 15); (2) word learning task at 20 months of age (N<sub>pandemic</sub> = 20); (3) language and communication development up to 30 months of age, via CDI and CSBS parental reports (N<sub>pandemic</sub> ranged 25–74); (4) overall development at 30 months of age using the Griffiths Developmental Scales (N<sub>pandemic</sub> = 16).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The pandemic sample consistently underperformed in all four studies in comparison to pre-pandemic data. There was no evidence of developed word segmentation abilities at 12 months of age, and no successful word learning at 20 months of age. Lexical development between 12 and 24 months of age was lower than in the pre-pandemic sample, while social communication did not seem to be affected. At 30 months of age, the pandemic sample showed lower scores and lower mental age on the Language and Communication Griffiths' subscale, in comparison to the pre-pandemic data.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Infants born and raised during the pandemic have a poorer language development, that persists at least until 30 months of age.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11435,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early human development\",\"volume\":\"195 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106081\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378224001506/pdfft?md5=380499cb3d967e9e89d651eda870e356&pid=1-s2.0-S0378378224001506-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early human development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378224001506\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early human development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378378224001506","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:越来越多的证据表明,COVID-19 带来的变化立即影响了早期语言的发展。但这些与 COVID-19 相关的变化会在多长时间内影响儿童的语言发展却鲜为人知。本研究对这一问题进行了系统性的纵向研究,对儿童最初 2.5 年的语言发展情况进行了跟踪:本研究是对 Frota 等人(2022 年)研究样本的后续研究,该研究表明,在大流行期间出生和长大的 7-9 个月大婴儿与大流行前的同龄人不同,不会对单词进行分段。该研究共进行了四项研究:(1)12 个月大时的单词分段任务(Npandemic = 15);(2)20 个月大时的单词学习任务(Npandemic = 20);(3)通过 CDI 和 CSBS 父母报告(Npandemic 范围为 25-74)了解 30 个月大时的语言和沟通发展情况;(4)使用格里菲斯发展量表(Griffiths Developmental Scales)了解 30 个月大时的整体发展情况(Npandemic = 16):与大流行前的数据相比,大流行样本在所有四项研究中的表现一直较差。在 12 个月大时,没有证据表明他们的分词能力有所发展,在 20 个月大时,也没有成功的单词学习。12 个月至 24 个月期间的词汇能力发展低于大流行前的样本,而社会交流能力似乎没有受到影响。与大流行前的数据相比,在 30 个月大时,大流行样本的语言和沟通格里菲斯分量表得分较低,心智年龄也较低:结论:大流行期间出生和成长的婴儿语言发育较差,这种情况至少持续到 30 个月大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prolonged COVID-19 related effects on early language development: A longitudinal study

Background

There is growing evidence that COVID-19 brought changes that immediately affected early language development. Little is known for how long these COVID-19 related changes shaped development. The current study systematically and longitudinally addressed this issue, following up children's language development throughout the first 2.5 years.

Method

The present study follows up on the sample from Frota et al. (2022), which demonstrated that 7–9-month-old infants born and raised during the pandemic do not segment words unlike pre-pandemic peers. Four studies were conducted: (1) word segmentation task at 12 months of age (Npandemic = 15); (2) word learning task at 20 months of age (Npandemic = 20); (3) language and communication development up to 30 months of age, via CDI and CSBS parental reports (Npandemic ranged 25–74); (4) overall development at 30 months of age using the Griffiths Developmental Scales (Npandemic = 16).

Results

The pandemic sample consistently underperformed in all four studies in comparison to pre-pandemic data. There was no evidence of developed word segmentation abilities at 12 months of age, and no successful word learning at 20 months of age. Lexical development between 12 and 24 months of age was lower than in the pre-pandemic sample, while social communication did not seem to be affected. At 30 months of age, the pandemic sample showed lower scores and lower mental age on the Language and Communication Griffiths' subscale, in comparison to the pre-pandemic data.

Conclusions

Infants born and raised during the pandemic have a poorer language development, that persists at least until 30 months of age.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Early human development
Early human development 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Established as an authoritative, highly cited voice on early human development, Early Human Development provides a unique opportunity for researchers and clinicians to bridge the communication gap between disciplines. Creating a forum for the productive exchange of ideas concerning early human growth and development, the journal publishes original research and clinical papers with particular emphasis on the continuum between fetal life and the perinatal period; aspects of postnatal growth influenced by early events; and the safeguarding of the quality of human survival. The first comprehensive and interdisciplinary journal in this area of growing importance, Early Human Development offers pertinent contributions to the following subject areas: Fetology; perinatology; pediatrics; growth and development; obstetrics; reproduction and fertility; epidemiology; behavioural sciences; nutrition and metabolism; teratology; neurology; brain biology; developmental psychology and screening.
期刊最新文献
Early pain findings in infants with brachial plexus birth injury: Relationship with function and comorbidities, and cut-off point for fractures Cardiac autonomic regulation as a proxy of early neurodevelopment: A systematic review Implementation of nutritional care bundle is associated with improved growth in preterm infants born before 32 gestational weeks Evaluation of normal and abnormal fetal renal microvascular flow characteristics of three-dimensional MV-flow imaging Validity and use of the Neonatal Infant Stressor Scale: An integrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1