经导管主动脉瓣置换术中预防中风的脑栓塞保护。

IF 1.8 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-02 DOI:10.1080/14779072.2024.2385989
Jawad Basit, Mushood Ahmed, George Kidess, Zaofashan Zaheer, Laveeza Fatima, Hamza Naveed, Mohammad Hamza, Maurish Fatima, Aman Goyal, Pranav Loyalka, Mahboob Alam, M Chadi Alraies
{"title":"经导管主动脉瓣置换术中预防中风的脑栓塞保护。","authors":"Jawad Basit, Mushood Ahmed, George Kidess, Zaofashan Zaheer, Laveeza Fatima, Hamza Naveed, Mohammad Hamza, Maurish Fatima, Aman Goyal, Pranav Loyalka, Mahboob Alam, M Chadi Alraies","doi":"10.1080/14779072.2024.2385989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cerebral Embolic Protection Device (CEPD) captures emboli during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). With recently published pivotal trials and multiple cohort studies reporting new data, there is a need to re-calibrate available statistical evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted across databases from inception till February 2023. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled using Odds Ratio (OR), while continuous outcomes were pooled using Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) along with 95% corresponding intervals (95% CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data was included from 17 studies (7 RCTs, 10 cohorts, <i>n</i> = 155,829). Use of CEPD was associated with significantly reduced odds of stroke (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.43-0.85, <i>p</i> = 0.003). There was no significant difference in disabling stroke (<i>p</i> = 0.25), non-disabling stroke (<i>p</i> = 0.72), and 30-day mortality (<i>p</i> = 0.10) between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups for Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI) findings, acute kidney injury, risk of pacemaker implantation life-threatening bleed, major bleed, minor bleed, worsening National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and vascular complications (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of CEPD during TAVR reduced the incidence of all-stroke (<i>p</i> = 0.003); however, there were no significant differences in any of the other pooled outcomes (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The protocol of this meta-analysis was registered with the Open Science framework [https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7W564] before data acquisition was started.</p>","PeriodicalId":12098,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cerebral embolic protection for stroke prevention during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.\",\"authors\":\"Jawad Basit, Mushood Ahmed, George Kidess, Zaofashan Zaheer, Laveeza Fatima, Hamza Naveed, Mohammad Hamza, Maurish Fatima, Aman Goyal, Pranav Loyalka, Mahboob Alam, M Chadi Alraies\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14779072.2024.2385989\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cerebral Embolic Protection Device (CEPD) captures emboli during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). With recently published pivotal trials and multiple cohort studies reporting new data, there is a need to re-calibrate available statistical evidence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted across databases from inception till February 2023. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled using Odds Ratio (OR), while continuous outcomes were pooled using Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) along with 95% corresponding intervals (95% CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data was included from 17 studies (7 RCTs, 10 cohorts, <i>n</i> = 155,829). Use of CEPD was associated with significantly reduced odds of stroke (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.43-0.85, <i>p</i> = 0.003). There was no significant difference in disabling stroke (<i>p</i> = 0.25), non-disabling stroke (<i>p</i> = 0.72), and 30-day mortality (<i>p</i> = 0.10) between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups for Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI) findings, acute kidney injury, risk of pacemaker implantation life-threatening bleed, major bleed, minor bleed, worsening National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and vascular complications (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of CEPD during TAVR reduced the incidence of all-stroke (<i>p</i> = 0.003); however, there were no significant differences in any of the other pooled outcomes (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The protocol of this meta-analysis was registered with the Open Science framework [https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7W564] before data acquisition was started.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12098,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2024.2385989\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14779072.2024.2385989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:脑栓塞保护装置(CEPD)可捕捉经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中的栓子。最近发表的关键试验和多项队列研究报告了新数据,因此有必要重新校准现有的统计证据:方法:对从开始到 2023 年 2 月的数据库进行了系统性文献检索。结果:共纳入了 17 项研究的数据(其中 7 项为临床研究):17项研究(7项RCT,10项队列,n=155,829)纳入了数据。使用 CEPD 可显著降低中风几率(OR = 0.60,95% CI = 0.43-0.85,p = 0.003)。两组患者在致残性中风(p = 0.25)、非致残性中风(p = 0.72)和 30 天死亡率(p = 0.10)方面无明显差异。两组在弥散加权磁共振成像(DW-MRI)结果、急性肾损伤、起搏器植入风险、危及生命的出血、大出血、小出血、美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)恶化、改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)和血管并发症方面无明显差异(P > 0.05):结论:在TAVR期间使用CEPD可降低全部卒中的发生率(p = 0.003);然而,其他汇总结果无显著差异(p > 0.05):这项荟萃分析的方案在数据采集开始前已在开放科学框架[https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7W564]注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cerebral embolic protection for stroke prevention during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Introduction: Cerebral Embolic Protection Device (CEPD) captures emboli during Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). With recently published pivotal trials and multiple cohort studies reporting new data, there is a need to re-calibrate available statistical evidence.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted across databases from inception till February 2023. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled using Odds Ratio (OR), while continuous outcomes were pooled using Standardized Mean Difference (SMD) along with 95% corresponding intervals (95% CIs).

Results: Data was included from 17 studies (7 RCTs, 10 cohorts, n = 155,829). Use of CEPD was associated with significantly reduced odds of stroke (OR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.43-0.85, p = 0.003). There was no significant difference in disabling stroke (p = 0.25), non-disabling stroke (p = 0.72), and 30-day mortality (p = 0.10) between the two groups. There were no significant differences between the two groups for Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI) findings, acute kidney injury, risk of pacemaker implantation life-threatening bleed, major bleed, minor bleed, worsening National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and vascular complications (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The use of CEPD during TAVR reduced the incidence of all-stroke (p = 0.003); however, there were no significant differences in any of the other pooled outcomes (p > 0.05).

Registration: The protocol of this meta-analysis was registered with the Open Science framework [https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7W564] before data acquisition was started.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy (ISSN 1477-9072) provides expert reviews on the clinical applications of new medicines, therapeutic agents and diagnostics in cardiovascular disease. Coverage includes drug therapy, heart disease, vascular disorders, hypertension, cholesterol in cardiovascular disease, heart disease, stroke, heart failure and cardiovascular surgery. The Expert Review format is unique. Each review provides a complete overview of current thinking in a key area of research or clinical practice.
期刊最新文献
Short-term and long-term outcomes of cardiac arrhythmias in patients with cardiogenic shock. Nattokinase as an adjuvant therapeutic strategy for non-communicable diseases: a review of fibrinolytic, antithrombotic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant effects. The role of eprosartan in the management of essential hypertension: literature review and expert opinion. What are the early warning signs of myocarditis during the pathway of care? Managing elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and multimorbidity: call for a systematic approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1