提高内窥镜检查室的效率:整合团队工作流程可提高生产率并最大限度地降低成本。

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2024.07.008
Zoë Post MD , Prabakar Theivaraaj MS-IE , Christopher G. Chapman MD , Ajaypal Singh MD , Irving Waxman MD , Maham Lodhi MD , Neal A. Mehta MD
{"title":"提高内窥镜检查室的效率:整合团队工作流程可提高生产率并最大限度地降低成本。","authors":"Zoë Post MD ,&nbsp;Prabakar Theivaraaj MS-IE ,&nbsp;Christopher G. Chapman MD ,&nbsp;Ajaypal Singh MD ,&nbsp;Irving Waxman MD ,&nbsp;Maham Lodhi MD ,&nbsp;Neal A. Mehta MD","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Inefficiencies in the endoscopy suite cause frustration for physicians, hospital administrators, staff, and patients. Turnover time (TOT), the time between one case ending and another beginning, is subjectively disproportionate between various team members. We aimed to define perceptions of TOT and target steps within the process to improve efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a prospective cohort study at a tertiary center outpatient endoscopy unit. Phase I aimed to identify the TOT process components based on time stamps in the electronic medical record (N = 686). We defined gastroenterologist perceived TOT (pTOT), anesthesia pTOT, and standard TOT (sTOT). TOT length was calculated for each subgroup. Patient transport was identified as an intervenable target. In Phase II, the task of patient transport moved from the anesthesiology team to endoscopy nurses. Mean TOT and proportion of cases with sTOT &lt;15 minutes’ preintervention (n = 2192) and postintervention (n = 292) were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven key TOT components were identified that explain variations in pTOT. Average anesthesia pTOT was 15 minutes, whereas average gastroenterologist pTOT was 34 minutes (25.9% vs 57.2% of case length; <em>P</em> = .0007). In Phase II, mean sTOT improved from 18.51 to 14.25 minutes (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001), and proportion of sTOT within 15 minutes improved from 41.79% to 58.90% (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001). This intervention saved 45 minutes per room per day, allowing for a revenue potential of more than $300,000 per year per procedure room.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study defines variations in TOT and shows that finding imbalances and sharing the workload significantly cuts costs and improves the overall efficiency of the different subgroups in the turnover process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":"101 2","pages":"Pages 358-364"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boosting efficiency in the endoscopy suite: integrating team workflows improves productivity and minimizes cost\",\"authors\":\"Zoë Post MD ,&nbsp;Prabakar Theivaraaj MS-IE ,&nbsp;Christopher G. Chapman MD ,&nbsp;Ajaypal Singh MD ,&nbsp;Irving Waxman MD ,&nbsp;Maham Lodhi MD ,&nbsp;Neal A. Mehta MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gie.2024.07.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and Aims</h3><div>Inefficiencies in the endoscopy suite cause frustration for physicians, hospital administrators, staff, and patients. Turnover time (TOT), the time between one case ending and another beginning, is subjectively disproportionate between various team members. We aimed to define perceptions of TOT and target steps within the process to improve efficiency.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a prospective cohort study at a tertiary center outpatient endoscopy unit. Phase I aimed to identify the TOT process components based on time stamps in the electronic medical record (N = 686). We defined gastroenterologist perceived TOT (pTOT), anesthesia pTOT, and standard TOT (sTOT). TOT length was calculated for each subgroup. Patient transport was identified as an intervenable target. In Phase II, the task of patient transport moved from the anesthesiology team to endoscopy nurses. Mean TOT and proportion of cases with sTOT &lt;15 minutes’ preintervention (n = 2192) and postintervention (n = 292) were compared.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Seven key TOT components were identified that explain variations in pTOT. Average anesthesia pTOT was 15 minutes, whereas average gastroenterologist pTOT was 34 minutes (25.9% vs 57.2% of case length; <em>P</em> = .0007). In Phase II, mean sTOT improved from 18.51 to 14.25 minutes (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001), and proportion of sTOT within 15 minutes improved from 41.79% to 58.90% (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001). This intervention saved 45 minutes per room per day, allowing for a revenue potential of more than $300,000 per year per procedure room.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study defines variations in TOT and shows that finding imbalances and sharing the workload significantly cuts costs and improves the overall efficiency of the different subgroups in the turnover process.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"volume\":\"101 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 358-364\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gastrointestinal endoscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510724033546\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016510724033546","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:内窥镜检查室的效率低下令医生、医院管理人员、员工和患者感到沮丧。周转时间(TOT)是指一个病例结束和另一个病例开始之间的时间,不同团队成员之间的周转时间主观上不成比例。我们的目的是确定对 TOT 的看法,并确定流程中的目标步骤,以提高效率:这是一项前瞻性队列研究,研究对象是一家三级医院的门诊内镜室。第一阶段旨在根据电子病历(n=686)中的时间戳确定 TOT 流程的组成部分。我们定义了胃肠病学家(GI)认为的 TOT(PTOT)、麻醉学 PTOT 和标准 TOT(sTOT)。我们计算了每个分组的 TOT 时长。患者转运被确定为可干预目标。在第二阶段,转运病人的任务从麻醉科团队转移到了内窥镜检查护士。平均 TOT 和 sTOT 病例比例 结果:我们确定了解释 PTOT 变化的 7 个关键 TOT 要素。平均麻醉 PTOT 为 15 分钟,而平均消化道 PTOT 为 34 分钟(占病例长度的 25.9% 对 57.2%,P=0.0007)。在第二阶段,平均 sTOT 从 18.51 分钟缩短至 14.25 分钟(p 结论:本研究界定了 TOT 的差异,并证明找到不平衡点并分担工作量可显著降低成本,提高周转过程中不同分组的整体效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Boosting efficiency in the endoscopy suite: integrating team workflows improves productivity and minimizes cost

Background and Aims

Inefficiencies in the endoscopy suite cause frustration for physicians, hospital administrators, staff, and patients. Turnover time (TOT), the time between one case ending and another beginning, is subjectively disproportionate between various team members. We aimed to define perceptions of TOT and target steps within the process to improve efficiency.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study at a tertiary center outpatient endoscopy unit. Phase I aimed to identify the TOT process components based on time stamps in the electronic medical record (N = 686). We defined gastroenterologist perceived TOT (pTOT), anesthesia pTOT, and standard TOT (sTOT). TOT length was calculated for each subgroup. Patient transport was identified as an intervenable target. In Phase II, the task of patient transport moved from the anesthesiology team to endoscopy nurses. Mean TOT and proportion of cases with sTOT <15 minutes’ preintervention (n = 2192) and postintervention (n = 292) were compared.

Results

Seven key TOT components were identified that explain variations in pTOT. Average anesthesia pTOT was 15 minutes, whereas average gastroenterologist pTOT was 34 minutes (25.9% vs 57.2% of case length; P = .0007). In Phase II, mean sTOT improved from 18.51 to 14.25 minutes (P < .0001), and proportion of sTOT within 15 minutes improved from 41.79% to 58.90% (P < .0001). This intervention saved 45 minutes per room per day, allowing for a revenue potential of more than $300,000 per year per procedure room.

Conclusions

This study defines variations in TOT and shows that finding imbalances and sharing the workload significantly cuts costs and improves the overall efficiency of the different subgroups in the turnover process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Erratum Contents Prospective randomized controlled trial of water exchange plus cap versus water exchange colonoscopy in unsedated veterans Boosting efficiency in the endoscopy suite: integrating team workflows improves productivity and minimizes cost Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and capsule endoscopy in patients with diabetes: a matched cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1