胸腔积液中细菌聚集的临床影响

IF 3.4 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES Infectious Disease Reports Pub Date : 2024-07-18 DOI:10.3390/idr16040046
James B Doub, Nicole Putnam
{"title":"胸腔积液中细菌聚集的临床影响","authors":"James B Doub, Nicole Putnam","doi":"10.3390/idr16040046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Bacterial aggregation has been well described to occur in synovial fluid, but it is unknown if bacteria form aggregates in body fluids beyond the synovial fluid. Consequently, this translational study evaluated the ability to form bacterial aggregates in different pleural fluids. <i>Methods:</i> Four of the most common causes of thoracic empyema-<i>Streptococcus mitis</i>, <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i>, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>-were used here. The different pleural fluids included one transudative and two exudative pleural fluids. Twenty-four-well microwell plates were used to form the aggregates with the aid of an incubating shaker at different dynamic conditions (120 RPM, 30 RPM, and static). The aggregates were then visualized with SEM and evaluated for antibiotic resistance and the ability of tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) to dissolve the aggregates. Statistical comparisons were made between the different groups. <i>Results:</i> Bacterial aggregates formed at high shaking speeds in all pleural fluid types, but no aggregates were seen in TSB. When a low shaking speed (30 RPM) was used, only exudative pleural fluid with a high protein content formed aggregates. No aggregates formed under static conditions. Furthermore, there was a statistical difference in the CFU/mL of bacteria present after antibiotics were administered compared to bacteria with no antibiotics (<i>p</i> < 0.005) and when TPA plus antibiotics were administered compared to antibiotics alone (<i>p</i> < 0.005). <i>Conclusions:</i> This study shows that bacteria can form aggregates in pleural fluid and at dynamic conditions similar to those seen in vivo with thoracic empyema. Importantly, this study provides a pathophysiological underpinning for the reason why antibiotics alone have a limited utility in treating empyema.</p>","PeriodicalId":13579,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Disease Reports","volume":"16 4","pages":"608-614"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270245/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Ramifications of Bacterial Aggregation in Pleural Fluid.\",\"authors\":\"James B Doub, Nicole Putnam\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/idr16040046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Bacterial aggregation has been well described to occur in synovial fluid, but it is unknown if bacteria form aggregates in body fluids beyond the synovial fluid. Consequently, this translational study evaluated the ability to form bacterial aggregates in different pleural fluids. <i>Methods:</i> Four of the most common causes of thoracic empyema-<i>Streptococcus mitis</i>, <i>Streptococcus pneumoniae</i>, <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i>-were used here. The different pleural fluids included one transudative and two exudative pleural fluids. Twenty-four-well microwell plates were used to form the aggregates with the aid of an incubating shaker at different dynamic conditions (120 RPM, 30 RPM, and static). The aggregates were then visualized with SEM and evaluated for antibiotic resistance and the ability of tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) to dissolve the aggregates. Statistical comparisons were made between the different groups. <i>Results:</i> Bacterial aggregates formed at high shaking speeds in all pleural fluid types, but no aggregates were seen in TSB. When a low shaking speed (30 RPM) was used, only exudative pleural fluid with a high protein content formed aggregates. No aggregates formed under static conditions. Furthermore, there was a statistical difference in the CFU/mL of bacteria present after antibiotics were administered compared to bacteria with no antibiotics (<i>p</i> < 0.005) and when TPA plus antibiotics were administered compared to antibiotics alone (<i>p</i> < 0.005). <i>Conclusions:</i> This study shows that bacteria can form aggregates in pleural fluid and at dynamic conditions similar to those seen in vivo with thoracic empyema. Importantly, this study provides a pathophysiological underpinning for the reason why antibiotics alone have a limited utility in treating empyema.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infectious Disease Reports\",\"volume\":\"16 4\",\"pages\":\"608-614\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11270245/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infectious Disease Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/idr16040046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Disease Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/idr16040046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:细菌在滑膜液中聚集的情况已被详细描述,但细菌是否会在滑膜液以外的体液中形成聚集还不得而知。因此,本转化研究评估了细菌在不同胸腔积液中形成聚集的能力。研究方法本研究使用了胸腔积液最常见的四种病因--肝炎链球菌、肺炎链球菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和绿脓杆菌。不同的胸腔积液包括一种渗出性胸腔积液和两种渗出性胸腔积液。使用二十四孔微孔板在不同的动态条件(120 转/分钟、30 转/分钟和静态)下借助培养摇床形成聚集体。然后用扫描电镜观察聚集体,评估抗生素耐药性和组织纤溶酶原激活剂(TPA)溶解聚集体的能力。对不同组别进行统计比较。结果所有类型的胸腔积液在高速振荡时都会形成细菌聚集体,但在 TSB 中未发现聚集体。使用低速振荡(30 转/分钟)时,只有蛋白质含量高的渗出性胸腔积液才会形成聚集体。在静态条件下没有聚集体形成。此外,与未使用抗生素的细菌相比,使用抗生素后细菌的 CFU/毫升数存在统计学差异(p < 0.005);与单独使用抗生素相比,使用 TPA 加抗生素后细菌的 CFU/毫升数也存在统计学差异(p < 0.005)。结论:本研究表明,细菌可在胸腔积液中形成聚集体,其动态条件与胸腔积液的动态条件相似。重要的是,这项研究提供了一个病理生理学基础,说明为什么单纯使用抗生素治疗肺水肿的效果有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Ramifications of Bacterial Aggregation in Pleural Fluid.

Background: Bacterial aggregation has been well described to occur in synovial fluid, but it is unknown if bacteria form aggregates in body fluids beyond the synovial fluid. Consequently, this translational study evaluated the ability to form bacterial aggregates in different pleural fluids. Methods: Four of the most common causes of thoracic empyema-Streptococcus mitis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa-were used here. The different pleural fluids included one transudative and two exudative pleural fluids. Twenty-four-well microwell plates were used to form the aggregates with the aid of an incubating shaker at different dynamic conditions (120 RPM, 30 RPM, and static). The aggregates were then visualized with SEM and evaluated for antibiotic resistance and the ability of tissue plasminogen activator (TPA) to dissolve the aggregates. Statistical comparisons were made between the different groups. Results: Bacterial aggregates formed at high shaking speeds in all pleural fluid types, but no aggregates were seen in TSB. When a low shaking speed (30 RPM) was used, only exudative pleural fluid with a high protein content formed aggregates. No aggregates formed under static conditions. Furthermore, there was a statistical difference in the CFU/mL of bacteria present after antibiotics were administered compared to bacteria with no antibiotics (p < 0.005) and when TPA plus antibiotics were administered compared to antibiotics alone (p < 0.005). Conclusions: This study shows that bacteria can form aggregates in pleural fluid and at dynamic conditions similar to those seen in vivo with thoracic empyema. Importantly, this study provides a pathophysiological underpinning for the reason why antibiotics alone have a limited utility in treating empyema.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Infectious Disease Reports
Infectious Disease Reports INFECTIOUS DISEASES-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Safety and Efficacy of a 48-Month Efinaconazole 10% Solution Treatment/Maintenance Regimen: 24-Month Daily Use Followed by 24-Month Intermittent Use. Early Use of Liraglutide for the Treatment of Acute COVID-19 Infection: An Open-Label Single-Center Phase II Safety Study with Biomarker Profiling. Etiological Insights and the Role of Individual Factors in Infectious Spondylodiscitis. Treatment of Onychomycosis and the Drug-Drug Interactions in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Foot Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Addressing Vaccine Hesitancy: Validating the PACV Survey for Croatian Parents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1